What’s so troubling about ‘voluntary’ family planning anyway? A feminist perspective

References

• Basu, A. M. 1997. The ‘politicization’ of fertility to achieve non-demographic objectives, Population Studies 51: 5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellows, N. M., Askew, I., and Bellows, B. 2015. Review of performance-based incentives in community-based family planning programmes. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 41(2), 146–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100883
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, D., E. E. Foley, A. Hendrixson, and S. Schultz. 2020. Targets and technologies: Sayana Press and Jadelle in contemporary population policies, Gender, Place and Culture 27: 351–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendix, D., and S. Schultz. 2018. The political economy of family planning: Population dynamics and contraceptive markets, Development and Change 49: 259–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, J., K. Andersen, D. Brahmi, J. Healy, A. Mark, A. Ajode, and R. Griffin. 2018. What contraception do women use after abortion? An analysis of 319,385 cases from eight countries, Global Public Health 13: 35–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1174280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, R., J. S. Sasser, D. Ojeda, A. Hendrixson, S. Nadimpally, and E. E. Foley. 2020. A feminist exploration of ‘populationism’: Engaging contemporary forms of population control, Gender, Place & Culture 27: 333–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1553859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, J. 1994. Judith Blake on fertility control and the problem of voluntarism, Population and Development Review 20: 167–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2137635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J., and B. C. O’Neill. 2018. Global warming policy: Is population left out in the cold?, Science 361: 650–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J., and R. Sitruk-Ware. 2019. Climate change and contraception, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 45: 233–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandi, K., E. Woodhams, K. O. White, and P. K. Mehta. 2018. An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion, Contraception 97: 329–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. 1990. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: A simple framework, Studies in Family Planning 21: 61–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1966669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunson, J. 2016. Planning Families in Nepal: Global and Local Projects of Reproduction. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunson, J. 2020. Tool of economic development, metric of global health: Promoting planned families and economized life in Nepal, Social Science and Medicine 254: 112298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. M. 1998. Schools of thought: An analysis of interest groups influential in international population policy, Population and Environment 19(6): 487–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024660407333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassils, J. A. 2003. Overpopulation, sustainable development, and security: Developing an integrated strategy, Population and Environment 25: 171–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000032321.00906.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccia, R., and E. Lombardo. 2019. Care policies in practice: How discourse matters for policy implementation, Policy and Society 38(4): 537–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1702278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., S. Bernstein, A. Ezeh, A. Faundes, A. Glasier, and J. Innis. 2006. Family planning: The unfinished agenda, The Lancet 368: 1810–1827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. 2003. Population control is history: New perspectives on the international campaign to limit population growth, Comparative Studies in Society and History 45: 122–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham, J., A. Germain, and P. Hunt. 2012. Use of human rights to meet the unmet need for family planning, The Lancet 380(9837): 172–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60732-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Dehesa, R. 2019. Social medicine, feminism and the politics of population: From transnational knowledge networks to national social movements in Brazil and Mexico, Global Public Health 14: 803–816. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1443486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo, S. 2017. From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña, Global Public Health, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1293707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeny, P. 1994. Two proposals for the agenda at Cairo, International Family Planning Perspectives 20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2133335
   Google Scholar
• Drabo, S. 2020. Beyond ‘family planning’—Local realities on contraception and abortion in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, Social Sciences 9: 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110212
   Google Scholar
• Edmeades, J., S. M. Lee-Rife, and A. Malhotra. 2010. Women and reproductive control: The nexus between abortion and contraceptive use in Madhya Pradesh, India, Studies in Family Planning 41: 75–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00228.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmeades, J., C. Mejia, J. Parsons, and M. Sebany. 2018. A Conceptual Framework for Reproductive Empowerment: Empowering Individuals and Couples to Improve their Health (Background Paper). Available: Washington DC: International Centre for Reseach on Women.
   Google Scholar
• Farah, F. M. 2005. Changing population paradigms post ICPD: Policy and programme implications, Genus 61(3/4): 141–163. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29789272
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, J. L. 2011. Men bring condoms, women take pills, Gender & Society 25: 496–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211416113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderjohann, J., and C. Roberts. 2018. Missing men, missing infertility: The enactment of sex/gender in surveys in low- and middle-income countries, Population Horizons 15(2): 66–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/pophzn-2018-0003
   Google Scholar
• Foley, E. E. 2007. Overlaps and disconnects in reproductive health care: Global policies, national programs, and the micropolitics of reproduction in northern Senegal, Medical Anthropology 26(4): 323–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740701619830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FP2020. 2017. Family Planning 2020: Rights and Empowerment Principles for Family Planning. Available: http://www.familyplanning2020.org/sites/default/files/rights-based-fp/FP2020_Statement_of_Principles_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ganivet, E. 2020. Growth in human population and consumption both need to be addressed to reach an ecologically sustainable future, Environment, Development and Sustainability 22(6): 4979–4998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00446-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geronimus, A. T. 2003. Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States, Social Science & Medicine 57: 881–893. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00456-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geronimus, A. T. 2004. Teenage childbearing as cultural prism, British Medical Bulletin 69: 155–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldh019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. and R. Rapp. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasier, A., A. M. Gülmezoglu, G. P. Schmid, C. G. Moreno, and P. F. Van Look. 2006. Sexual and reproductive health: A matter of life and death, The Lancet 368: 1595–1607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69478-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goisis, A., and W. Sigle-Rushton. 2014. Childbearing postponement and child well-being: A complex and varied relationship?, Demography 51(5): 1821–1841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0335-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., L. Fuentes, and A. Allina. 2014. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46(3): 171–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 1990. Toward a political economy of fertility: Anthropological contributions, Population and Development Review 16(1): 85–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1972530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 1994. Controlling births and bodies in village China, American Ethnologist 21: 3–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.1.02a00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 1995. Anthropology theorizes reproduction: Integrating practice, political economic, and feminist perspectives, in S. Greenhalgh (eds), Situating Fertility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 2007. Globalization and population governance in China, in A. Ong and S. J. Collier (eds), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 354–372.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., E. S. Mann, S. Borrero, C. Dehlendorf, J. Fields, T. Geronimus, A. M. Gómez, et al. 2016. Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), American Journal of Public Health 106(1): 18–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillebaud, J. 2016. Voluntary family planning to minimise and mitigate climate change, BMJ (Online) 353: 5–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardee, K., S. Harris, M. Rodriguez, J. Kumar, L. Bakamjian, K. Newman, and W. Brown. 2014. Achieving the goal of the London Summit on Family Planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: What can we learn from past experiences with coercion?, International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40: 206–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/4020614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardee, K., J. Kumar, K. Newman, L. Bakamjian, S. Harris, M. Rodríguez, and W. Brown. 2014. Voluntary, human rights-based family planning: A conceptual framework, Studies in Family Planning 45(1): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00373.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B. 1995. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrixson, A. 2019a. Population control in the troubled present: The ‘120 by 20’ target and implant access program, Development and Change 50: 786–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrixson, A. 2019b. A renewed call for feminist resistance to population control, DifferenTakes 94. Available: https://sites.hampshire.edu/popdev/a-renewed-call-for-feminist-resistance-to-climate-change/
   Google Scholar
• Hendrixson, A., and B. Hartmann. 2019. Threats and burdens: Challenging scarcity-driven narratives of “overpopulation”, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 101: 250–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrixson, A., D. Ojeda, J. S. Sasser, S. Nadimpally, E. E. Foley, and R. Bhatia. 2020. Confronting populationism: Feminist challenges to population control in an era of climate change, Gender, Place and Culture 27: 307–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1639634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, M. 2014. Sustainable development, demography and sexual and reproductive health: Inseparable linkages and their policy implications, Reproductive Health Matters 22: 28–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43757-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. A. 2014. Celebration meets caution: LARC’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach, Contraception 89(4): 237–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J. 2000. Transforming family planning programmes: Towards a framework for advancing the reproductive rights agenda, Reproductive Health Matters 8(15): 21–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(00)90003-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A. 1995. Implementing the ICPD’s message, Studies in Family Planning 26(5), 296. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2138015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, A., and K. Hardee. 2018. Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the context of rights-based family planning, Studies in Family Planning 49: 171–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, P., and R. Jeffery. 2002. A population out of control? Myths about Muslim fertility in contemporary India, World Development 30: 1805–1822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00066-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. T., and M. D. Creinin. 2020. Family planning, population growth, and the environment, Contraception 101: 145–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalwij, A. 2010. The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in Western Europe, Demography 47: 503–519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, E. L., and S. De Zordo. 2012. Introduction. Ethnography and biopolitics: Tracing ‘rationalities’ of reproduction across the north–south divide, Anthropology & Medicine 19: 137–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2012.675050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, N., and D. Spears. 2018. Optimal population and exhaustible resource constraints, Journal of Population Economics 31: 295–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0665-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg, S. 2005. Foucault’s population geographies: Classifications, biopolitics and governmental spaces, Population, Space and Place 11: 137–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loll, D., P. J. Fleming, R. Stephenson, E. J. King, E. Morhe, A. Manu, and K. S. Hall. 2020. Factors associated with reproductive autonomy in Ghana, Culture, Health and Sexuality 23: 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1710567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maternowska, M. C. 2006. Reproducing Inequities: Poverty and the Politics of Population in Haiti. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, L. 2010. Introduction. In Mazur, L. (ed.) A pivotal moment. Population, justice, and the environmental challenge. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal, J. 2019. Reproductive governance and the (re)definition of human rights in Poland, Medical Anthropology 38: 182–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1472090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M. 2019. Reproductive governance, redux, Medical Anthropology 38: 113–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1555829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M., and E. F. S. Roberts. 2012. Reproductive governance in Latin America, Anthropology and Medicine 19: 241–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2012.675046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumtaz, Z., and S. Salway. 2009. Understanding gendered influences on women’s reproductive health in Pakistan: Moving beyond the autonomy paradigm, Social Science & Medicine 68: 1349–1356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2017. The Economization of Life. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nandagiri, R., E. Coast, and J. Strong. 2020. COVID-19 and abortion: Making structural violence visible, International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46(Suppl. 1): 83–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, K., S. Fisher, S. Mayhew, and J. Stephenson. 2014. Population, sexual and reproductive health, rights and sustainable development: Forging a common agenda, Reproductive Health Matters 22: 53–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43770-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, B. 2000. Cairo and climate change: A win–win opportunity, Global Environmental Change 10(2): 93–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00013-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouedraogo, R., L. Senderowicz, and C. Ngbichi. 2020. “I wasn’t ready”: Abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, International Journal of Public Health 65: 477–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01359-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchesky, R. 1980. Reproductive freedom: Beyond "a woman's right to choose", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5: 661–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/493757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchesky, R. 1995. From population control to reproductive rights: Feminist faultlines, Reproductive Health Matters 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-8080(95)90172-8
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. 2017. Quality of care in the context of rights-based family planning. Available: https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017RH_QoCRightsBasedFP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. E., A. J. Stevenson, K. Coleman-Minahan, K. Hopkins, K. White, S. E. Baum, and D. Grossman. 2019. Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy, Contraception: 4–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, M. 2014. Getting family planning and population back on track, Global Health: Science and Practice 2(2): 145–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prata, N., A. Fraser, M. J. Huchko, J. D. Gipson, M. Withers, S. Lewis, E. J. Ciaraldi, et al. 2017. Women’s empowerment and family planning: A review of literature, Journal of Biosocial Science 1: 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presser, H. 1997. Demography, feminism, and the science–policy nexus, Population and Development Review 23: 295–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2137547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. 2012. Women’s autonomy and unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant women in Bangladesh, Maternal and Child Health Journal 16: 1206–1214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0897-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey, L. A. 2004. Construction, control and family planning in Tanzania: Some bodies the same and some bodies different, Feminist Review 78: 56–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripple, W. J., C. Wolf, T. M. Newsome, P. Barnard, and W. R. Moomaw. 2019. World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency, BioScience 70: 8–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. J. 2017. Reproductive justice as intersectional feminist activism, Souls 19: 286–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2017.1389634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasser, J. 2018. On Infertile Ground: Population Control and Women’s Rights in the era of Climate Change. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satia, J., and K. Chauhan. 2018. Improving Quality of Care in Family Planning. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, S. R., E. Rottach, and P. Mukiri. 2011. Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: A qualitative study, Journal of Public Health in Africa 2: 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2011.e25
   Google Scholar
• Sen, G. 1999. Southern feminist perspectives on population and reproductive rights: Continuing challenges, Development 42(1): 25–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110005
   Google Scholar
• Sen, G. 2010. Integrating family planning with sexual and reproductive health and rights: The past as prologue?, Studies in Family Planning 41: 143–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00237.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, G., A. Iyer, S. Chattopadhyay, and R. Khosla. 2020. When accountability meets power: Realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights, International Journal for Equity in Health 19: 111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01221-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz, L. 2019. “I was obligated to accept”: A qualitative exploration of contraceptive coercion, Social Science & Medicine 239: 112531. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz, L. 2020. Contraceptive autonomy: Conceptions and measurement of a novel family planning indicator, Studies in Family Planning. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz, L., and J. Higgins. 2020. Reproductive autonomy is nonnegotiable, even in the time of covid-19, International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46: 147–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1363/intsexrephea.46.2020.0147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senderowicz, L., E. Pearson, K. Hackett, S. Huber-Krum, J. M. Francis, N. Ulenga, and T. Bärnighausen. 2021. ‘I haven’t heard much about other methods’: Quality of care and person-centredness in a programme to promote the postpartum intrauterine device in Tanzania, BMJ Global Health 6(6), e005775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinding, S. 2007. Overview and perspective, in W. C. Robinson and J. A. Ross (eds), The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. Vol. 21. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H. D. 2020. Numbering others: Religious demography, identity, and fertility management experiences in contemporary India, Social Science and Medicine 254: 112534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Oka, V. 2009. Unintended consequences: Exploring the tensions between development programs and indigenous women in Mexico in the context of reproductive health, Social Science & Medicine 68: 2069–2077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, I. 1996. Gender analysis of family planning: Beyond the feminist vs. population control debate, Feminist Economics 2: 63–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13545709610001707656
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., K. Newman, and S. Mayhew. 2010. Population dynamics and climate change: What are the links?, Journal of Public Health 32: 150–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. 2021. Sexual and reproductive health and rights: Where is the progress since Beijing?, Agenda, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2021.1918008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFPA, and Centre for Reproductive Rights. 2013. ICPD and Human Rights: 20 Years of Advancing Reproductive Rights Through UN Treaty Bodies and Legal Reform. Available: https://www.unfpa.org/publications/icpd-and-human-rights
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2019. World Population Prospects 2019 (9789211483161). https://population.un.org/wpp/
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, U. D., P. Y. Danza, T. B. Neilands, J. D. Gipson, C. D. Brindis, M. J. Hindin, D. Greene Foster, et al. 2021. Development and validation of the sexual and reproductive empowerment scale for adolescents and young adults, Journal of Adolescent Health 68(1): 86–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, U. D., S. L. Dworkin, T. A. Weitz, and D. G. Foster. 2014. Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale, Studies in Family Planning 45(1): 19–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00374.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. J. 2016. Population growth and its implications for global security, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 75: 980–1004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegs, C., A. A. Creanga, C. Galavotti, and E. Wamalwa. 2016. Community dialogue to shift social norms and enable family planning: An evaluation of the Family Planning Results Initiative in Kenya, PLoS ONE 11(4): e0153907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigl-Jäger, C. 2016. Islam and contraception in urban North India—Muslim women’s reproductive health behavior and decision-making, Interdisziplinäre Zeitshrift für Südasienforschung 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.11588/izsa.2016.1.845
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2015. Towards a radical re-appropriation: Gender, development and neoliberal feminism, Development and Change 46: 803–832. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2017a. In the name of reproductive rights: Race, neoliberalism and the embodied violence of population policies, New Formations 91: 50–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF:91.03.2017
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2017b. Re-centring ‘race’ in development: Population policies and global capital accumulation in the era of the SDGs, Globalizations 14: 432–449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1275402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2018. For reproductive justice in an era of Gates and Modi: The violence of India’s population policies, Feminist Review 119: 89–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0112-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin, A. E. 2019. Power, politics and knowledge claims: Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the SDG era, Global Policy 10: 52–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 1996. Women and the biological reproduction of “the nation”, Women’s Studies International Forum 19: 17–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(95)00075-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccala, E., and R. Horton. 2018. Addressing the unfinished agenda on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the SDG era, The Lancet 391: 2581–2583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30890-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar