Uncertain steps into adulthood: Does economic precariousness hinder entry into the first co-residential partnership in the UK?

References

• Allison, P. D. 1982. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories, Sociological Methodology 13: 61–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/270718
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, J.-C. 2002. A survey of the use of the term précarité in French economics and sociology, Paris: Centre d' Étude de Emploi. Working Paper 19 (available at http://ceet.cnam.fr/medias/fichier/19-precarite-france_1508414679138-pdf?ID_FICHE=1050492&INLINE=FALSE).
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, J.-C. 2011. “Employment precariousness” in a European cross-national perspective. A sociological review of thirty years of research. Paris: Centre d' Économie de la Sorbonne. Working paper 78 (available at https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00654370/en/).
   Google Scholar
• Beaujouan, É. and M. Ní Bhrolcháin. 2011. Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s, Population Trends 145(1): 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/pt.2011.16
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. N. F. and D. G. Blanchflower. 2010. UK unemployment in the Great Recession, National Institute Economic Review 214(1): R3–R25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950110389755
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., J. Huinink, and R. A. Settersten. 2019. The life course cube: A tool for studying lives, Advances in Life Course Research 41: 100-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T. C., and M. Bagnoli. 1993. Courtship as a waiting game. Journal of Political Economy 101(1): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1086/261871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T., and R. F. Schoeni. 1996. Income prospects and age at marriage. Journal of Population Economics 9(2): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, A. and I. Diamond. 2000. Marriage or cohabitation: A competing risks analysis of first-partnership formation among the 1958 British birth cohort, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 163(2): 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, A., B. Perelli-Harris, and P. Trevena. 2015. Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage, Demographic Research 33: 327–362. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington, A. and J. Stone. 2014. Young adults’ transitions to residential independence in the UK: The role of social and housing policy, in L. Antonucci, M. Hamilton, and S. Roberts (eds), Young People and Social Policy in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 210–235.
   Google Scholar
• Bivand, P. 2012. Generation Lost Youth Unemployment and the Youth Labour Market. London: Trade Union Congress (TUC) (available at https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/generation_lost_touchstone_extras_2012.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, H.-P. 2009. Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective, Annual Review of Sociology 35: 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, H.-P. and J. Huinink. 1991. Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation, American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/229743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, H.-P. and A. Timm. 2003. (eds), Who Marries Whom?: Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Dordrecht: Springer.Series: European Studies of Population (Vol. 12).
   Google Scholar
• Bolano, D., and D. Vignoli. 2021. Union formation under conditions of uncertainty: The objective and subjective sides of employment uncertainty, Demographic Research 45: 141–186. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., A. Darbel, J.-P. Rivet and C. Seibel. 1963. Travail et travailleurs ein Algérie. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. [Adaptation in English: Bourdieu, P. 1979. The Disenchantment of the World.In R. Nice (Trans.), Algeria 1960: the disenchantment of the world, the sense of honour, the Kabyle house of the world reversed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., pp. 1–94]
   Google Scholar
• Busetta, A., D. Mendola, and D. Vignoli. 2019. Persistent joblessness and fertility intentions, Demographic Research 40: 185–218. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., T. K. Shackelford, L. A. Kirkpatrick, and R. J. Larsen. 2001. A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values, Journal of Marriage and Family 63(2): 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynner, J. 2005. Rethinking the youth phase of the life-course: The case for emerging adulthood?, Journal of Youth Studies 8(4): 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500431628
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, I. and R. Price. 2016. Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualisation, The Economic and Labour Relations Review 27(3): 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304616652074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. J., E. Cumberworth, S. P. Morgan, and C. Wimer. 2013. The effects of the Great Recession on family structure and fertility, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 650(1): 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213500643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choonara, J. 2019. Insecurity, Precarious Work and Labour Markets. Insecurity, Precarious Work and Labour Markets. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Choonara, J. 2020. The precarious concept of precarity, Review of Radical Political Economics 52(3): 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613420920427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciganda, D. 2015. Unstable work histories and fertility in France: An adaptation of sequence complexity measures to employment trajectories, Demographic Research 32: 843–876. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comolli, C. L. 2017. The fertility response to the Great Recession in Europe and the United States: Structural economic conditions and perceived economic uncertainty, Demographic Research 36: 1549–1600. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comolli, C. L. and D. Vignoli. 2019. Spread-ing uncertainty, shrinking birth rates, Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2019/08. Florence: Universita’ degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni ‘G. Parenti’.
   Google Scholar
• Corijn, M. and E. Klijzing (eds). 2001. Transitions to Adulthood in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer European Studies of Population (vol. 10).
   Google Scholar
• Datta, N., G. Giupponi, and S. Machin. 2019. Zero-hours contracts and labour market policy, Economic Policy 34(99): 369–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiz008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphin, T. 2012. Young People and Savings: A Route to Improved Financial Resilience. London: Institute for Public policy Research Report. (IPRR) (available at https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2012/11/young-people-savings_Nov2012_9849.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Ermisch, J. 2003. An Economic Analysis of the Family. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ermisch, J. and M. Francesconi. 2000. Cohabitation in Great Britain: Not for long, but here to stay, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 163(2): 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00163
   Google Scholar
• Esteve, A., C. Schwartz, J. Van Bavel, I. Permanyer, M. Klesment, and J. Garcia. 2016. The end of hypergamy: Global trends and implications, Population and Development Review 42(4): 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesconi, M. and K. Golsch. 2005. The process of globalization and transitions to adulthood in Britain, in H. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills and K. Kurz (eds), Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society: The Losers in a Globalizing World. London: Routledge, pp. 255–284.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, D., M. Hechter, and S. Kanazawa. 1994. A theory of the value of children, Demography 31(3): 375–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, A., J. Goodwin, H. O’Connor, S. Hadfield, S. Hall, K. Lowden, and R. Plugor. 2017. Young People in the Labour Market: Past, Present, Future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, D. (ed.). 2013. Economic Crisis, Quality of Work, and Social Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. and M. J. R. Healy. 1995. The graphical presentation of a collection of means, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 158(1): 175–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., D. D. Karaman Örsal, M. Kreyenfeld, and A. Jasilioniene. 2013. Fertility reactions to the "Great Recession" in Europe, Demographic Research 29: 85–104. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guetto, R., D. Vignoli, and G. Bazzani. 2021. Marriage and cohabitation under uncertainty: The role of narratives of the future during the COVID-19 pandemic, European Societies 23(S1): S674–S688. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Social and Economic Research. 2019. Understanding society: Waves 1–9, 2009–2018 and harmonised BHPS: Waves 1–18, 1991–2009. Special Licence Access. [data collection]. 12th ed. UK Data Service. SN: 6931. (Data downloaded in November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Jalovaara, M. 2012. Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969–81. Population Studies 66(1): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2011.641720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. 2002. The Youth Divide: Diverging Paths into Adulthood. New York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation (available at https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/1842630814.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. 2018. Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. 2011. The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing oppenheimer’s theory in Europe, European Journal of Population 27(3): 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-011-9238-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminska, O. and P. Lynn. 2019. Weighting and Sample Representation: Frequently Asked Questions (No. 2010-05). Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research. https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/general/weighting_faqs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, K. 2002. Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues, and implications, in A. Booth and C. Crowter (eds), Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation for Children, Families, and Social Policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Klesment, M. and J. Van Bavel. 2017. The reversal of the gender gap in education, motherhood, and women as main earners in Europe, European Sociological Review 33(3): 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, M. 2015. Economic uncertainty and fertility, KZfSS – Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie [Cologne Journal for Sociology and Social Psychology] 67(S1): 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-015-0325-6
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, P. and R. J. Wilde. 2019. Getting in and Getting on in the Youth Labour Market : Governing Young Peoples Employability in Regional Context. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsaganis, M., N. Rabemiafara, and T. Ward. 2013. Young People and Temporary Employment in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/comparative-information/young-people-and-temporary-employment-in-europe
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, A., K. Stewart, S. M. Himmelweit, and M. Palillo. 2016. Low Pay and in-Work Poverty: Preventative Measures and Preventative Approaches. Evidence Review Prepared for European Commission DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Luxemburg: Publications office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2767/43829
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M. and H.-P. Blossfeld. 2005. Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course. A theoretical framework, in H.-P. Blossfeld, M. Mills, E. Klijzing, and K. Kurz (eds), Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society. Routledge, pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and É. Beaujouan. 2013. Education and cohabitation in Britain: A return to traditional patterns?, Population and Development Review 39(3): 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00611.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). 2013. Women in the Labour Market. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/articles/womeninthelabourmarket/2013-09-25 (accessed: 22 May 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). 2018. How Well Are You Doing Compared With Other Young People? https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/articles/howwellareyoudoingcomparedwithotheryoungpeople/2018-10-04 (accessed: 12 February 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics (ONS). 2019. Families and Households in the UK. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/families/bulletins/familiesandhouseholds/2019 (accessed: 27 June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. 1988. A theory of marriage timing, American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1086/229030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. 2003. Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process, Demography 40(1): 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K., M. Kalmijn, and N. Lim. 1997. Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality, Demography 34(3): 311–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3038286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. and V. Lew. 1995. American marriage formation in the 1980s: How important was women's economic independence?, in K. Oppenheim Mason and A. M. Jensen (eds), Gender and Family Change in Industrialised Countries. New York: Clarendon Press, pp. 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, J., J. MacInnes, T. Nazio, and J. M. Roche. 2009. The United Kingdom: From flexible employment to vulnerable workers, in L. Vosko, M. MacDonald, and I. Campbell (eds), Gender and the Contours of Precarious Employment. London: Routledge, pp. 108–126.
   Google Scholar
• Pelikh, A. 2019. Transition to Adulthood in England and Wales: The Analysis of Life Trajectories of Young Adults. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
   Google Scholar
• Pitrou, A. 1978. La vie précaire des familles face à leurs difficultés [The precarious life of families in front of their difficulties]. Paris: Caisse Nationale Des Allocations Familiales. Études CNAF.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, L. and A. Nandi. 2020. Ethnic diversity in the UK: New opportunities and changing constraints, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1539229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raley, R. K. 2000. Recent trends and differentials in marriage and cohabitation: The United States, in M. Hindin, L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, E. Thomson, and A. Thornton (eds), The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan, P. 1999. Fertility behaviour under income uncertainty, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 15(1): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006106527618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. 2011. Beyond ‘NEET’ and ‘tidy’ pathways: Considering the ‘missing middle’ of youth transition studies, Journal of Youth Studies 14(1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2010.489604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubery, J. 1989. Precarious forms of work in the United Kingdom, in G. Rodgers and J. Rodgers (eds), Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Labour Organisation, pp. 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sassler, S., F. Addo, and E. Hartmann. 2010. The tempo of relationship progression among low-income couples, Social Science Research 39(5): 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassler, S. and A. J. Miller. 2017. Cohabitation Nation : Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. 2017. The effects of the Great Recession on American families, Sociology Compass 11(4): e12463. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C. R. 2013. Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences, Annual Review of Sociology 39(1): 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sealey, C. 2014. Social exclusion, risk and the UK youth labour market, in L. Antonucci, M. Hamilton, and S. Roberts (eds.) Young People and Social Policy in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D. and J. B. Willett. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sironi, M. and F. F. Furstenberg. 2012. Trends in the economic independence of young adults in the United States: 1973-2007, Population and Development Review 38(4): 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T., V. Skirbekk, and D. Philipov. 2011. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world, Population and Development Review 37(2): 267–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat : The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academics.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2014. A Precariat Charter : From Denizens to Citizens. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2019a. Stata 16 Base Reference Manual: Margins. College Station, TX: Stata Press. https://www.stata.com/manuals/rmarginsplot.pdf
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2019b. Stata 16 Base Reference Manual: Marginsplot. College Station, TX: Stata Press. https://www.stata.com/manuals/rmargins.pdf#rmargins
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2021. Stata Statistical software: release 17, College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, F. 2005. Event history analysis, NCRM Methods Review Paper (NCRM/004). Bristol: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods (available at https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4467/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-004.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J., A. Berrington, and J. Falkingham. 2011. The changing determinants of UK young adults’ living arrangements, Demographic Research 25: 629–666. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, J., A. Berrington, and J. Falkingham. 2014. Gender, turning points, and boomerangs: Returning home in young adulthood in Great Britain, Demography 51(1): 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0247-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, M. M. and M. Cancian. 2004. The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating, Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocchioni, V., A. Berrington, D. Vignoli, and A. Vitali. 2021. The changing association between homeownership and the transition to parenthood, Demography 58(5): 1843–1865. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9420322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKHLS Support Forum. 2013. Support #228: Wave 3 equivalent of b_indscbh_xw - Understanding Society User Support. https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/228 (accessed: 16 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Understanding Society. 2022. Interview and Fieldwork Process. https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/mainstage/user-guides/main-survey-user-guide/interview-and-fieldwork-process (accessed: 19 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. 2018. What do men want? The growing importance of men’s characteristics for fertility, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 1: 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s041
   Google Scholar
• Van De Kaa, D. J. 1987. Europe’s second demographic transition, Population Bulletin 42(1): 1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignoli, D., G. Bazzani, R. Guetto, A. Minello, and E. Pirani. 2020. Uncertainty and narratives of the future: A theoretical framework for contemporary fertility, in R. Schoen (ed.), Analyzing Contemporary Fertility. Cham: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis (Vol. 51), pp. 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, T. and S. McLanahan. 2011. Marriage meets the Joneses: Relative income, identity, and marital status, Source: The Journal of Human Resources 46(3): 482–517. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.3.482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar