The relationship between life-course accumulated income and childbearing of Swedish men and women born 1940–70

References

• Andersson, G. 2000. The impact of labour-force participation on childbearing behaviour: Pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s, European Journal of Population 16(4): 293–333. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006454909642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, G. and K. Scott. 2008. Childbearing dynamics of couples in a universalistic welfare state: The role of labor-market status, country of origin, and gender, Demographic Research 17(30): 897–938. https://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, G. and M. Kolk. 2016. Trends in childbearing, marriage and divorce in Sweden: An update with data up to 2012, Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 50: 21–30. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.52483
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1960. An economic analysis of fertility, in George B. Roberts (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Cambridge, MA: Columbia University Press, pp. 209–240.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. and H. G. Lewis. 1974. Interaction between quantity and quality of children, in T. W. Schultz (ed.), Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, T., C. Campbell, and J. Z. Lee. 2003. Life Under Pressure: Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asia, 1700-1900. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. M. 1972. Fertility and economic status – Some recent findings on differentials in Sweden, Population Studies 26(2): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/2173576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuller, M., M. Mogstad, and K. G. Salvanes. 2011. Life-cycle bias and the returns to schooling in current and lifetime earnings, IZA DP No. 5788. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1872736
   Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, A. 1993. A comparison between actual distributions of annual and lifetime income: Sweden 1951–89, Review of Income and Wealth 39(4): 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1993.tb00468.x
   Google Scholar
• Blake, J. 1968. Are babies consumer durables? A critique of the economic theory of reproductive motivation, Population Studies 22(1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2173350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A. and M. J. Lindquist. 2006. Life-cycle variations in the association between current and lifetime income: Replication and extension for Sweden, Journal of Labor Economics 24(4): 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/506489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., J. L. Glanville, and G. Stecklov. 2007. Socio-economic status, permanent income, and fertility: A latent-variable approach, Population Studies 61(1): 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720601103866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, M. O. M. 1989. The income-fertility relationship: Effect of the net price of a child, Demography 26(2): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budig, M. J. and P. England. 2001. The wage penalty for motherhood, American Sociological Review 66: 204–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., R. Dehejia, and D. Romanov. 2013. Financial incentives and fertility, Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Croix, D. and M. Doepke. 2003. Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters, American Economic Review 93(4): 1091–1113. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M. and M. Stanfors. 2010. Family life in power couples. Continued childbearing and union stability among the educational elite in Sweden, 1991–2005, Demographic Research 23: 847–878. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M., M. Oris, and L. Pozzi. 2014. Socioeconomic status and fertility before, during, and after the demographic transition: An introduction, Demographic Research 31(7): 161–182. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M. and C. D. Smith. 2021. Social class and fertility: A long-run analysis of Southern Sweden, 1922–2015, Population Studies 75(3): 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1810746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvander, A. Z. and G. Andersson. 2003. När har vi råd att skaffa fler barn? En studie om hur inkomst påverkar fortsatt barnafödande [When can we afford more children? A study on how income affects continued childbearing], RFV analyserar 8.
   Google Scholar
• Duvander, A.-Z. and M. Johansson. 2012. What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use?, Journal of European Social Policy 22(3): 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R. 1969. Toward a socio-economic theory of fertility, in S. J. Behrman, L. Corsa, and R. Freedman (eds), Fertility and Family Planning: A World View. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press, pp. 127–156.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K. A. and E. P. Hutchinson. 1935. Studies of Differential Fertility in Sweden. Stockholm: PS King & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Ewer, P. A. and E. Crimmins-Gardner. 1978. Income in the income and fertility relationship, Journal of Marriage and the Family 40(2): 291–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/350760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., S. Klüsener, and M. Myrskylä. 2019. Is a positive relationship between fertility and economic development emerging at the sub-national regional level? Theoretical considerations and evidence from Europe, European Journal of Population 35(3): 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9485-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. S. and A. Thornton. 1982. Income and fertility: The elusive relationship, Demography 19(1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, P. R. 1988. Basic patterns in annual variations in fertility, nuptiality, mortality, and prices in pre-industrial Europe, Population Studies 42(2): 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000143366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grätz, M. and M. Kolk. 2022. Sibling similarity in income: A life course perspective, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 78: 100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2022.100688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoem, J. 1993. Public policy as the fuel of fertility: Effects of a policy reform on the pace of childbearing in Sweden in the 1980s, Acta Sociologica 36(1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939303600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalovaara, M. and A. Miettinen. 2013. Does his paycheck also matter?: The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland, Demographic Research 28: 881–916. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalovaara, M., G. Neyer, G. Andersson, J. Dahlberg, L. Dommermuth, P. Fallesen, and T. Lappegård. 2019. Education, gender, and cohort fertility in the Nordic countries, European Journal of Population 35: 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. E. and M. Tertilt. 2008. An economic history of fertility in the US: 1826-1960, in P. Rupert (ed.), Frontiers of Family Economics. Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp. 165–230.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. E., A. Schoonbroodt, and M. Tertilt. 2010. Fertility theories: Can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?, in J. B. Shoven (ed.), Demography and the Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 43–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, J. D., J. O. G. Billy, and K. West. 1986. Status Enhancement and Fertility. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, M. and K. Barclay. 2019. Cognitive ability and fertility among Swedish men born 1951–1967: Evidence from military conscription registers, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286: 20190359. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, M. 2021. Government transfers to parents and population policy in a global perspective: An economic demographic perspective, The Journal of Development Studies 57(9): 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1915480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, M. and K. Barclay. 2021. Do income and marriage mediate the relationship between cognitive ability and fertility? Data from Swedish taxation and conscriptions registers for men born 1951–1967, Intelligence 84: 101514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, D. 1986. The dynamics of population-growth, differential fertility, and inequality, American Economic Review 76(5): 1103–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. 1987. Population dynamics of humans and other animals, Demography 24(4): 443–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. and M. Anderson. 2002. Malthus in state space: Macro economic-demographic relations in English history, 1540 to 1870, Journal of Population Economics 15(2): 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. and R. Hingson. 1974. Diffusion of family planning innovations: Theoretical and practical issues, Studies in Family Planning 5(6): 189–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/1965369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livi-Bacci, M. 1986. Social-group forerunners of fertility control in Europe, in A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins (eds), The Decline of Fertility in Europe: The Revised Proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 182–200.
   Google Scholar
• Malthus, T. R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population, as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society. With Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J. Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Mare, R. D. 2011. A multigenerational view of inequality, Demography 48(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0014-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLanahan, S. 2004. Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition, Demography 41(4): 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, K. 2005. Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility, Review of Economics and Statistics 87(3): 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653054638382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler, and F. C. Billari. 2009. Advances in development reverse fertility declines, Nature 460(7256): 741–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notestein, F. W. 1936. Class differences in fertility, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 188(1): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271623618800104
   Google Scholar
• Preston, S. H. and C. S. Hartnett. 2010. The future of American fertility, in J. B. Shoven (ed.), Demography and the Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, G. 2011. Socio-economic determinants of divorce in early twentieth-century Sweden, The History of the Family 16(3): 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, G. and E. Marklund. 2019. A prelude to the dual provider family – The changing role of female labor force participation and occupational field on fertility outcomes during the baby boom in Sweden 1900–60, The History of the Family 24(1): 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2018.1556721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, J. 2016. Booms, busts, and fertility: Testing the Becker model using gender-specific labor demand, Journal of Human Resources 51(1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigle-Rushton, W. and J. Waldfogel. 2007. Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries, Feminist Economics 13(2): 55–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700601184849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. 2014. Essays on Income and Fertility: Sweden 1968-2009. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. L. 1975. The mixed effects of income upon successive births may explain the convergence phenomenon, Population Studies 29(1): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1975.10410188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skirbekk, V. 2008. Fertility trends by social status, Demographic Research 18(5): 145–180. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T., V. Skirbekk, and D. Philipov. 2011. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world, Population and Development Review 37(2): 267–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfors, M. and F. Goldscheider. 2017. The forest and the trees: Industrialization, demographic change, and the ongoing gender revolution in Sweden and the United States, 1870-2010, Demographic Research 36: 173–226. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2014. Utrikes föddas barnafödande – före och efter invandring [Childbearing of the foreign-born – Before and after migration], Demografiska rapporter 2014: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. R. and L. Toulemon. 2006. Family formation in France: Individual preferences and subsequent outcomes, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006(4): 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2006s41
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. 2005. Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar