A Critique of Operations for Peptic Ulcer

REFERENCES

• WÖlfler, A.: Gastroenterostomie. Zentralbl. Chir. 45:705, 1881.
   Google Scholar
• Von Eiselsberg, A.: Zur Ausschaltung Inoperablen Pylorusstenosen. Arch. klin. Chir. 50:919–939, 1895.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H. and Leven, N. L.: Gastric resection for esophagitis and stricture of acid-peptic origin. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 88:560–570, 1949.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLean, L. D. and Wangensteen, O. H.: Surgical treatment of esophageal strictures. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 103:5–14, 1956.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: The passing of gastrojejunostomy as a standard operation for ulcer. Journal-Lancet 62:415, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, L. J., Varco, R. L., Code, C. F. and Wangensteen. O. H.: The experimental production of gastric and duodenal ulcers in laboratory animals. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 75:170–182, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, W. D., Hallgrimson, S., Egdahl, R. H. and Wangensteen, O. H.: Evaluation of tubular gastric resection combined with transverse gastroplasty as a suitable operation for peptic ulcer. IN: Surgical Forum, Clinical Coogress of the American College of Surgeons. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Company, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Segmental gastric resection—an acceptable operation for peptic ulcer; tubular resection unacceptable. Surgery 41:686–690 (April) 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidt, H.: Experimentelle Studien am nach Pawlow isolierten kleinen Magen über die sekretorische Arbeit der Magendrüsen nach den Resektionen Billroth I und II, sowie nach der Pylorusausschaltung nach v. Eiselsberg. Arch. klin. Chir. 125:26–85, 1923.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt, H.: Uber Magensektionen und Magenchemismus. Arch. klin. Chir. 130:307–322, 1924.
   Google Scholar
• Portis, S. A. and Portis, B.: Effects of subtotal gastrectomy on gastric secretion; experimental studies by aid of a Pavlov pouch in dogs. J.A.M.A. 86:836–839, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Thal, A. P., Perry, J. F., Jr. and Wangensteen, O. H.: The physiologic effects of various types of gastrectomy on gastric acid production with special reference to the function of the denervated gastric antrum. Surgery 41:576–588, 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H., Sanchez, H. and Sako, Y.: Sensitivity of the esophagus to the acid-pepsin action. Am. J. Physiol. 105:476 (September) 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. F., Jr., Salmon, P. A., Imamoglu, K., Yonehiro, E. G. and Wangensteen, O. H.: Digestive action of gastric juice following various types of gastric resection for duodenal ulcer. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 95:722 (October) 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. A. and Perry, J. F., Jr.: Unpublished observations, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, F. S., Ferguson, D. J. and Wangensteen, O. H.: Evaluation of segmental gastric resection for peptic ulcer. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 77:689, 1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holle, F. and Heinrick, G.: Subdiaphragmatic fundusectomy in gastric surgery. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 101:385 (October) 1955.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gueullette, R.: Chirurgie de L'Estomac. Paris, Masson et Cie, 1956, p. 432.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: A physiological operation for megaesophagus (dystonia, cardiospasm, achalasia). Ann. Surg. 134:301, 1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Megaesophagus (esophageal dystonia) and esophagitis. Tr. Am. Acad. Ophth. (July-August) 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Technique of achieving an adequate extramucosal myotomy in megaesophagus (achalasia, cardiospasm, dystonia). Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 105:339 (September) 1957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly, W. D., MacLean, L. D., Perry, J. F., Jr. and Wangensteen, O. H.: A study of patients following total and near-total gastrectomy. Surgery 35:964, 1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean, L. D. and Sundberg, R. D.: Incidence of megaloblastic anemia after total gastrectomy. New England J. Med. 254:885–893 (May) 1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, W. C.: Sixty years of vagotomy; a review of some 200 articles. Gastroenterology 10:413, 1948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragstedt, L. R. and Owens, F. M., Jr.: Supra-diaphragmatic section of the vagus nerves in treatment of duodenal ulcer. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 53:152–154, 1913.
   Google Scholar
• O'Berhelman, H. A. and Dragstedt, L. R.: New physiologic concepts related to the surgical treatment of duodenal ulcer by vagotomy and gastrojejunostomy. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 101:194, 1955.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoerr, S. O.: Evaluation of vagotomy with gastroenterostomy performed for chronic duodenal ulcer. Surgery 38:144–157, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Smithwick, R. H.: Conservative gastric resection combined with vagotomy. Surgery 41:344, 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. W. and Herrington, J. L., Jr.: Efficacy of 40 per cent gastrectomy combined with vagotomy for duodenal ulcer. Surgery 41:346, 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallis, L. F.: Personal communication, October 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Aseptic gastric resection. I. A method of aseptic anastomosis adaptable to any segment of the alimentary canal (esophagus, stomach, small or large intestine); II. including preliminary description of subtotal excision of the acid-secreting area for ulcer. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 70:58–70, 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H., Varco, R. L., Hay, L. J., Walpole, S. and Trach, B.: Gastric acidity before and after operative procedure with special reference to the role of the pylorus and antrum. Ann. Surg. 112:626–670, 1940.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mears, F. B.: The effect of atropine on gastric secretion during the night. Surgery 13:214, 1943.
   Google Scholar
• Lillehei, C. W., Lewis, F. J. and Wangensteen, O. H.: The limitations of a gastric drainage operation upon the effectiveness of vagotomy. Gastroenterology 15:487–497, 1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Causes of failure after gastric resection for ulcer. Wisconsin M. J. 44:878–888 (September) 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Colp, R.: Subtotal gastrectomy with and without vagotomy for duodenal and gastrojejunal ulcer, present status. J.A.M.A. 162: 1599–1602, 1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordahl, N. B., Ross, R. P. and Baker, D. V., Jr.: The failure of partial gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Surgery 38:158, 1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goligher, J. C., Moir, P. J. and Rigley, J. H.: Billroth I and Polya operations for duodenal ulcer—a comparison. Lancet 2:220–222, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Wallensten, S.: Gastric resection for peptic ulcer; Billroth I versus Billroth II. Surgery 41:341, 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Haberer, H.: Meine Korrekturoperationen bei vorafgegangenen Eingriffen am Magen und Duodenum mit Ausschlusz des Carcinoma. Arch. klin. Chir. 196:304, 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Von Haberer, H.: Zur Radical Operationen des Ulcus Pepticum jejuni post-operativum. Verhandl. deutsch. Gesellsch. Chir. 42:68–95, 1913.
   Google Scholar
• Von Haberer, H.: Die Bedeutung des Pylorus für das Zustandekommen des Postoperative Jejunal Ulcus. Arch. klin. Chir. 117:50–67, 1921.
   Google Scholar
• Yonehiro, E. G.: Unpublished observations, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Enderlen, E. and Zukschwerdt, L.: Die Erregung der Magensaftsekretion nach Resektion des Antrum; Pylorusanteils des Magens. Deutsche Ztschr. Chir. 232:290, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Worobjein, A. M. and Volborth, G. B.: Uber die Bedeutung des Pylorus für die Tätigkeit der Fundaldrüsen. J. Physiol. U.S.S.R. 17:1291, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Brackney, E. G., Thal, A. P. and Wangensteen, O. H.: The role of the duodenum in the control of gastric secretion. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 88:302–306, 1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, W. J.: Anemic spot on the duodenum which may be mistaken for ulcer. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 6:600, 1908.
   Google Scholar
• Finsterer, H.: Local Anaesthesia Methods and Results in Abdominal Surgery. (Translated by J. Burke.) New York, Rebman Company, 1923.
   Google Scholar
• Finsterer, H.: Ausgedehnte Magenresektion bei ulcus duodeni statt der cinfachen Duodenalresektion—beim Pylorusausschaltung. Zentralbl. Chir. 45:434, 1918.
   Google Scholar
• Finsterer, H.: Resektion zur Ausschaltung oder Gastro-enterostomie beim nicht resezierbaren Ulcus duodeni. Zentralbl. Chir. 61:28, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, G. J., Holman, C. and Cooper, W. A.: The Treatment of Peptic Ulcer. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Company, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Segmental gastric resection for peptic ulcer; method permitting restoration of anatomic continuity. J.A.M.A. 149:18–23 (May) 1952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: Non-operative treatment of localized perforations of the duodenum. Minnesota Med. 18:477; 480, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. D., Cosgriff, J. H. and Gray, J. G.: Experiences with the treatment of acute massively bleeding peptic ulcer by blood replacement and gastric resection. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 103:409–415, 1956.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enquist, I. F., Karlson, K. E., Tanaka, A. M., Dennis, C., Fierst, S. L. and Young, L. A.: Statistically controlled evaluation of three methods of management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A progress report. Gastroenterology 32:619–627, 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: The ulcer problem. I. Etiology with special reference to interrelationship between the vascular and the acid-peptic digestive factors. II. Characterization of a satisfactory operation which will protect against recurrent ulcer. (Seventh Listerian oration.) Canad. M.A.J. 53:309, 1945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangensteen, O. H.: An assessment of etiologic aspects of peptic ulcer and surgical therapy (including obscure, massive, acid-peptic linked hemorrhage, esophagitis and cardiospasm and their surgical relief). (Alvarenga lecture IX.) Tr. & Stud. Coll. Physicians Philadelphia 18: 1–16, 1950.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spencer, F. C. and Maloney, J. V.: The examination of the gastric mucosa through a large gastrotomy in the diagnosis of intestinal hemorrhage of obscure origin. Surgery 40:904, 1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. F., Jr., Yonehiro, E. G., Ya, P. M., Root, H. D. and Wangensteen, O. H.: Digestive action of human gastric juicc. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 92:237–240, 1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merendino, K. A. and Dillard, D. H.: The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction: With special reference to reflux esophagitis, cardiospasm, and esophageal varices. Ann. Surg. 142:486–506, 1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, N. C.: Surgery of peptic ulceration and its complications. Postgrad. M. J. 30:448; 523; 577, 1954.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blakemore, A.: The role of the Patek dietary regimen in the preparation of the cirrhosis patients for portacaval shunting. Halsted Surgical Society meeting, September 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuque, T. J., Mulligan, L. V. and Neville, E. C.: Gastric secretion and peptic ulceration in dogs with portal obstruction and portacaval anastomoses. S. Forum (October) 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Phemister, D. B. and Humphreys, E. M.: Gastro-esophageal resection and total gastrectomy in the treatment of bleeding varicose veins in Banti's syndrome. Ann. Surg. 126:397, 1947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubiran, J. M., Kark, A. E., Montalbetti, A. J., Morel, C. J. L. and Dragstedt, L. R.: Peptic ulcer and the adrenal stress syndrome. A.M.A. Arch. Surg. 65:809–815, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S. J., Ramsey, C., Reifenstein, R. W. and Benson, J. A., Jr.: The significance of hormonal factors in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer. Gastroenterology 25:156–172, 1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillehei, C. W. and Wangensteen, O. H.: Effect of celiac ganglionectomy upon experimental peptic ulcer formation. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. 68:369, 1948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, T. R.: Some results of excision of the adrenal glands. J. Physiol. 49:38, 1914–1915.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann, F. C.: A study of the gastric ulcer following removal of the adrenals. J. Exper. Med. 23:203, 1916.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Root, H. D., Imamoglu, K., Crisp, N. W. and Jensen, C. B.: Unpublished observations, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Willmanns, R.: Resectio Praepylorica bei Ulcus Duodeni. Zentralbl. Chir. 53:1874, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, R. E.: An evaluation of gastric resection for peptic ulcer. Surgery 32:638–653 (October) 1952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, W. R. and Bartlett, M. K.: Antral exclusion with vagotomy for duodenal ulcer. I. Acid secretory studies on 50 patients. Ann. Surg. 146:3–11 (July) 1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvage, L. R., Schmitz, E. J., Storer, E. H., Kanar, E. A., Smith, F. R. and Harkins, H. N.: Relation between physiologic stimulatory mechanisms of gastric secretion and incidence of peptic ulceration; experimental study employing new preparations. Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 96:127, 1953.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly, W. D., Cross, F. S. and Wangensteen, O. H.: The importance of the spatial relationship of the gastric antrum in the development of gastrojejunal ulcer in the dog. S. Forum 4:339, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, E. R., Lyon, E. S., Landor, J. and Dragstedt, L. R.: The physiology of the gastric antrum. Gastroenterology 27:766, 1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar