References
- Simmons RL. Peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscesses: principles governing treatment. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Co. 1981: 3–10
- Stone HH, Kolb LD, Geheber CE. Incidence and significance of intraperitoneal anaerobic bacteria. Ann Surg 1975: 181(5): 705–15
- Nichols RL. Infections following gastrointestinal surgery: intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Clin North Am 1980: 60(1): 197–212
- Lally KP, Nichols RL. Various intraperitoneal irrigation solutions in treating experimental fecal peritonitis. South Med J 1981: 74(7): 789–98
- Fry DE, Garrison RN, Polk HC Jr. Clinical implications in Bacteroides bacteremia Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979: 149(2): 189–92
- Weinstein WM, Onderdonk AB, Bartlett JG, et al. Antimicrobial therapy of experimental intraabdominal sepsis. J Infect Dis 1975: 132(3): 282–6
- Bartlett JG, Louie TJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of 29 antimicrobial regimens in experimental intraabdominal sepsis. Rev infect Dis 1981: 3(3): 535–42
- Thadepalli H, Gorbach SL, Broido PW, et al. Abdominal trauma, anaerobes, and antibiotics. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973: 137(Aug): 270–6
- diZerega G, Yonekura L, Roy S, et al. A comparison of clindamycin-gentamicin and penicilin-gentamicin in the treatment of post-cesarean section endomyometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979: 134(3): 238–42
- Smith JA, Skidmore AG, Forward AD, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of metronidazole and tobramycin with clindamycin and tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis. Ann Surg 1960: 192(2): 213–20
- Harding GK, Buckwold FJ, Ronald AR, et al. Prospective, randomized comparative study of clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and ticarcilin, each in combination with gentamicin, in therapy for intraabdominal and female genital tract sepsis. J Infect Dis 1980: 142(3): 384–93
- Stone HH, Geheber CE, Kolb LD, et al. Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and similar polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis. Clin Ther 1981: 4(Suppl A): 67–80
- Tally FP, McGowan K, Kellum JM, et al. A randomized comparison of cefoxitin with or without amikacin and clindamycin plus amikacin in surgical sepsis. Ann Surg 1981: 193(3): 318–23
- Drusano GL, Warren JW, Saah AJ, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of cefoxitin versus clindamycin-aminoglycoside in mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982: 154(5): 715–20
- Schentag JJ, Wels PB, Reitberg DP, et al. A randomized clinical trial of moxalactam alone versus tobramycin plus clindamycin in abdominal sepsis. Ann Surg 1983: 198(1): 35–41
- Berne TV, Yellin AW, Appleman MD, et al. Antibiotic management of surgically treated gangrenous or perforated appendicitis: comparison of gentamicin and clindamycin versus cefamandole versus cefoperazone. Am J Surg 1982: 144(1): 8–13
- Smith CR, Lipsky JJ, Laskin OL, et al. Double-blind comparison of the nephrotoxicity and auditory toxicity of gentamicin and tobramycin. N Engl J Med 1980: 302(20): 1106–9
- Bubrick MP, Howard RJ, Pancorbo S, et al. A comparative study of netilmicin-cefoxitin and gentamicin-cefoxitin in surgical patients with serious systemic infections. Clin Ther 1983: 5(5): 515–24
- Lerner AM, Reyes MP, Cone LA, et al. Randomised. controlled trial of the comparative efficacy, auditory toxicity, and nephrotoxicity of tobramycin and netilmicin. Lancet 1983: 1(8334): 1123–7
- Dougherty SH, Flohr AB, Simmons RL. “Breakthrough” enterococcal septicemia in surgical patients: 19 cases and a review of the literature. Arch Surg 1983: 118(2): 232–8