Legal issues in managing breast disease

References

• National Institutes of Health. Survey finds U.S. women knowledgeable about breast cancer. JAMA 1981: 245(9): 918
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures. New York: American Cancer Society, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Henderson IC, Danner D. Legal pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1989: 3(4): 823–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner RJ. Medicolegal aspects of screening mammography. AJR 1989: 153(1): 53–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darios RJ. Biopsy of occult breast lesions and professional liability. (Letter) JAMA 1990: 264(15): 1948
   Google Scholar
• Cohn SD. Delay in diagnosis of breast cancer: a professional liability risk. J Nurse Midwifery 1991: 36(1): 74–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris JE. Defensive medicine: it costs, bur does it work’ (Editorial) JAMA 1987: 257(20): 2801–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye DJ, Gifford DG, Webb BL, et al. The causes of the medical malpractice crisis: an analysis of claims data and insurance company finances. Georgetown Law J 1988: 76(4): 1495–561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avoiding suit over failure to diagnose breast cancer. Fam Pract News 1991: 21(14): 3, 33
   Google Scholar
• Cancer-related claims: high in frequency, higher in cost. Focus 1990: 2: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Mittelmann M, Scholhamer CF. What are the chances when malignancy leads to a malpractice suit. Leg Aspects Med Pract 1980 Feb: 42–7
   Google Scholar
• Breast cancer study. Pennington, NJ: Physicians Insurers Assn of America, 1990 Mar
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson PD. Medical malpractice and the tort system. JAMA 1989: 262(23): 3320–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeton W, Dobbs D, Keeton R, et al. Drosser & Keeton on the law of torts. 5th ed. St Paul: West Publ, 1984
   Google Scholar
• Hirshfeld EB. Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation? JAMA 1991: 266(20): 2886–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshfeld EB. Practice parameters and the malpractice liability of physicians. JAMA 1990: 263(11): 1556, 1559–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig RA. The loss of a chance theory in medical malpractice cases: an overview. Am J Trial Advocacy 1990: 13(3): 1183–5
   Google Scholar
• Shoenberger AE. Medical malpractice injury: causation and valuation of the loss of a chance to survive. J Leg Med 1985: 6(1): 51–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parver CD. Defense of delayed diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Med Trial Technique Q 1983: 30(1): 34–63
   Google Scholar
• Plotkin D, Blankenberg F. Breast cancer: biology and malpractice. Am J Clin Oncol 1991: 14(3): 254–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love N. Why patients delay seeking care for cancer symptoms: what you can do about it. Postgrad Med 1991: 89(4): 151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron R. Faulty reasoning guides doubling-time defense. Med Malpract Law Strategy 1991: 9(1): 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Spratt JS, Spratt SW. Medical and legal implications of screening and follow-up procedures for breast cancer. Cancer 1990: 66 (6 Suppl): 1351–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson GS, Edgerton F, Wallace HJ Jr, et al. Delay, stage of disease and survival from breast cancer. J Chronic Dis 1979: 32(5): 365–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher ER, Redmond C, Fisher B. A perspective concerning the relation of duration of symptoms to treatment failure in patients with breast cancer. Cancer 1977: 40(6): 3160–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis CR, Gardner B, Lim B. Analysis of survival and recurrence vs patient and doctor delay in treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 1975: 35(3): 714–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleatman MA, Cardona RR. Detection of breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1990: 17(4): 729–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd GD. American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer: an overview. CA 1992: 42(3): 177–80
   Google Scholar
• Selinger HA, Goldfarb NI, Perkel RL, et al. Physician compliance with mammography guidelines: a retrospective chart review. Fam Med 1989: 21(1): 56–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boisaubin EV. Practice standards: implications for the internist. Am J Med Sci 1990: 300(3): 173–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Better v McCarthy, 173 A.2d 967 (NY 1991)
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur C, Smith A. Delay in breast cancer and the nature of presenting symptoms. Lancet 1981: 1(8220 Pt 1): 601–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelland A, Graham MD, Trott PA, et al. Diagnosing breast carcinoma in young women. BMJ 1991: 302(6777): 618–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brenner RJ, Sickles EA. Acceptability of periodic follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign. Radiology 1989: 171(3): 645–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller N, Dorr FA. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer: January 1985 through May 1990. Current bibliographies in medicine No. 90–6. Bethesda: US Dept of Health and Human Services, 1990
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth MG. Evaluation of mental competency. Am Fam Physician 1989: 39(6): 182–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulz MM. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest. Yale Law J 1985: 95(2): 219–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canterbury v Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (DC Cir 1972)
   Google Scholar
• Truman v Thomas, 611 p.2d 902 (Cal 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Demos MP. The ABCs of risk management for today's practicing physician. J Fla Med Assoc 1990: 77(1): 35–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doherty v Hellman, 547 N.E.2d 931 (Mass 1989)
   Google Scholar
• Green v Hussey, 262 N.E.2d 156 (Ill 1970)
   Google Scholar
• Rheinstein PH, Hoffman FA. Update on breast implants. Am Fam Physician 1991: 44(6): 2227–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce J. Breast implants: a doctor liability concern. Med Malpract Law Strategy 1991: 8(12): 3
   Google Scholar
• Nicholsen L. To sue or not to sue doctors in implant cases. Med Malpract Law Strategy 1992: 9: 3
   Google Scholar
• Wickline v California, 228 Cal Rptr 661 (Cal Ct App 1986)
   Google Scholar