89
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Features - Original Research

Reliability analysis of Cobb measurement in degenerative lumbar scoliosis using endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks

, , , &
Pages 762-767 | Received 01 May 2017, Accepted 14 Jun 2017, Published online: 21 Jun 2017

References

  • Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, et al. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2360–2371.
  • Morrison DG, Chan A, Hill D, et al. Correlation between Cobb angle, spinous process angle (SPA) and apical vertebrae rotation (AVR) on posteroanterior radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Eur Spine J. 2015;24:306–312.
  • Lechner R, Putzer D, Dammerer D, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Int Orthop. 2017;41:957–962.
  • Will RE, Stokes IA, Qiu X, et al. Cobb angle progression in adolescent scoliosis begins at the intervertebral disc. Spine. 2009;34:2782–2786.
  • Zhang J, Lou E, Shi X, et al. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:383–387.
  • Negrini S, Negrini F, Fusco C, et al. Idiopathic scoliosis patients with curves more than 45 Cobb degrees refusing surgery can be effectively treated through bracing with curve improvements. Spine J. 2011;11:369–380.
  • Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, et al. Centroid method: an alternative method of determining coronal curvature in scoliosis. A comparative study versus Cobb method in the degenerative spine. Spine J. 2013;13:421–427.
  • Shi B, Mao S, Xu L, et al. Accurate prediction of height loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Cobb angle alone is insufficient. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:3341–3346.
  • Tauchi R, Tsuji T, Cahill PJ, et al. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26:53–57.
  • Dang NR, Moreau MJ, Hill DL, et al. Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group’s AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:1064–1069.
  • Allam Y, El-Fiky T, Farghally MY, et al. Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:444–449.
  • Loder RT, Urquhart A, Steen H, et al. Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:768–770.
  • Loder RT, Spiegel D, Gutknecht S, et al. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age. Spine. 2004;29:2548–2553.
  • Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:320–327.
  • Mehta SS, Modi HN, Srinivasalu S, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:749–754. Epub 2010/01/28.
  • Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:142S–58S.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  • Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. 2010;10:769–774.
  • Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, et al. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31:1240–1246.
  • Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1587–1592.
  • Qiao J, Liu Z, Xu L, et al. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25:E88–92. Epub 2012/01/13.
  • Wu W, Liang J, Du Y, et al. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:33.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.