Are residents receiving the training needed within their residency programs to optimally manage patients with diabetes?

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Casagrande SS, Linder B, Cowie CC. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and subsequent Type 2 diabetes among U.S. women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;141:200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;161:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peabody MR, O’Neill TR, Stelter KL, et al. Frequency and criticality of diagnoses in family medicine practices: from the national ambulatory medical care survey (NAMCS). J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(1):126–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahla L, Vasudev R, Chitturi C, et al. Diabetes mellitus treatment-Related medical knowledge among health care providers. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017;11(1):69–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisson SD, Bertram A. Changes in knowledge of diabetes guidelines during internal medicine residency training. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010;4(3):193–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. 2018 physician specialty data report. Secondary 2018 physician specialty data report. [cited 2020 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-largest-specialties-2017.
   Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Supplement 1):S207–S12.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar V, Wolf A, Brown A, et al. Challenges in diabetes care: can digital health help address them? Clin Diabetes. 2016;34(3):133–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerr D, King F, Klonoff DC. Digital health interventions for diabetes: everything to gain and nothing to lose. Diabetes Spectr. 2019;323:226–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei W, Zhao S, Fu SL, et al. The association of hypoglycemia assessed by continuous glucose monitoring with cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 7. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Technology: standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S77–s88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 9. American Diabetes Association. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S98–s110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Riddlesworth TD, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi C, Liu S, Yu HF, et al. Glycemic variability and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes receiving hemodialysis: A prospective cohort study. J Diabetes Complications. 2020;34(4):107549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau M, Campbell H, Tang T, et al. Impact of patient use of an online patient portal on diabetes outcomes. Can J Diabetes. 2014;38(1):17–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, et al. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LT, Koepsell TD, Haneuse SJ, et al. Glycemic control associated with secure patient-provider messaging within a shared electronic medical record: a longitudinal analysis. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2726–2733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz I, Huang J, Muelly ER, et al. Association of mobile patient portal access with diabetes medication adherence and glycemic levels among adults with diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1921429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada SL, Allison JJ, Rosen AK, et al. Sustained use of patient portal features and improvements in diabetes physiological measures. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(7):e179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota B, Salas J, Sayavong S, et al. Use of an online patient portal and glucose control in primary care patients with diabetes. Popul Health Manag. 2016;19(2):125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmittdiel JA, Adams SR, Segal J, et al. Novel use and utility of integrated electronic health records to assess rates of prediabetes recognition and treatment: brief report from an integrated electronic health records pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(2):565–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly DJ, Bowen JM, Sebaldt RJ, et al. Evaluation of a chronic disease management system for the treatment and management of diabetes in primary health care practices in Ontario: an observational study. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014;14(3):1–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Residency Directory: American Academy of Family Physicians. Secondary residency directory: American Academy of Family Physicians; 2019. [cited 2019 Sep 19]. Available from: https://nf.aafp.org/Directories/Residency/Search.
   Google Scholar
• Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. List of Programs by Specialty: ACGME. Secondary List of Programs by Specialty: ACGME; 2018. [cited 2019 Sep 19]. Available from: https://apps.acgme.org/ads/Public/Reports/Report/1.
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Association. FREIDA: American Medical Association Residency Program Listing. Secondary FREIDA: American Medical Association Residency Program Listing; 2019. Available from: https://freida.ama-assn.org/Freida/#/programs?program=residencies&specialtiesToSearch=140
   Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care.2019;42(Supplement 1):S90–S102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, et al. Consensus Statement By The American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College Of Endocrinology On The Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm - 2020 Executive Summary. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(1):107–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker M. Old habits die hard: newer diabetes drugs slow to be adopted; 2017. [cited 2020 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/888727.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Ghani M, DeFronzo RA. Is it time to change the type 2 diabetes treatment paradigm? Yes! GLP-1 RAs should replace Metformin in the Type 2 diabetes algorithm. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(8):1121–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah VN, Garg SK. Managing diabetes in the digital age. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;1(1):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawton J, Blackburn M, Allen J, et al. Patients’ and caregivers’ experiences of using continuous glucose monitoring to support diabetes self-management: qualitative study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018;18(1):12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickup JC, Ford Holloway M, Samsi K. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a qualitative framework analysis of patient narratives. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):544–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperl-Hillen J, O’Connor PJ, Ekstrom HL, et al. Educating resident physicians using virtual case-based simulation improves diabetes management: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2014;89(12):1664–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin DJ, McDonnell ME. Effect of a diabetes curriculum on internal medicine resident knowledge. Endocr Pract. 2010;16(3):408–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis SE, Schwarz M, Curran DR. North Carolina family medicine residency programs’ diabetes learning collaborative. Fam Med. 2006;38(3):190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar