116
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical features - Original Research

Nomogram to predict survival outcome of patients with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after refractory cardiogenic shock

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 37-46 | Received 24 Feb 2021, Accepted 30 Apr 2021, Published online: 20 May 2021

References

  • Schmidt M, Burrell A, Roberts L, et al. Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score. Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 1;36(33):2246–2256.
  • Fux T, Holm M, Corbascio M, et al. VA-ECMO support in nonsurgical patients with refractory cardiogenic shock: pre-implant outcome predictors. Artif Organs. 2019 Feb;43(2):132–141.
  • Schiller P, Hellgren L, Vikholm P. Survival after refractory cardiogenic shock is comparable in patients with impella and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation when adjusted for SAVE score. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):329–337.
  • Ouweneel DM, Schotborgh JV, Limpens J, et al. Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1922–1934.
  • Lee SY, Jeon KH, Lee HJ, et al. Complications of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Int J Artif Organs. 2020 Jan;43(1):37–44.
  • Napp LC, Kuhn C, Bauersachs J. ECMO in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. Herz. 2017 Feb;42(1):27–44.
  • Sun T, Guy A, Sidhu A, et al. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for emergency cardiac support. J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:31–38.
  • Muller G, Flecher E, Lebreton G, et al. The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):370–378.
  • Wang L, Yang F, Wang X, et al. Predicting mortality in patients undergoing VA-ECMO after coronary artery bypass grafting: the REMEMBER score. Crit Care. 2019 Jan 11;23(1):11.
  • Wengenmayer T, Duerschmied D, Graf E, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model for survival in patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the PREDICT VA-ECMO score. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;1:2048872618789052.
  • Zhang M, Yang H, Mou X, et al. An interactive nomogram to predict healthcare-associated infections in ICU patients: a multicenter study in GuiZhou Province, China. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;14(7):e0219456.
  • Wang B, Li M, Ma H, et al. Computed tomography-based predictive nomogram for differentiating primary progressive pulmonary tuberculosis from community-acquired pneumonia in children.  BMC Medical Imaging. 2019;19:63.
  • Luo W, Huang Q, Huang X, et al. Predicting Breast Cancer in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5 lesions: a nomogram combining radiomics and BI-RADS. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;9:11921.
  • Jiang W, Guo Q, Wang C, et al. A nomogram based on 9-lncRNAs signature for improving prognostic prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell International. 2019;19:208.
  • DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.Biometrics. 1988 [1988-Sep];44(3):837–845.
  • Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565–574.
  • Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users’ guides to the medical literature. Jama. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377–1384.
  • Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1–73.
  • Lew CCH, Wong GJY, Cheung KP, et al. When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Oct 22;8(1):98.
  • Rahman A, Hasan RM, Agarwala R, et al. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool. Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;35(1):158–162.
  • Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Jiang X, et al. Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R268.
  • De Vries MC, Koekkoek WK, Opdam MH, et al. Nutritional assessment of critically ill patients: validation of the modified NUTRIC score. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Mar;72(3):428–435.
  • Na SJ, Chung CR, Cho YH, et al. Vasoactive inotropic score as a predictor of mortality in adult patients with cardiogenic shock: medical therapy versus ECMO. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;72(1):40–47.
  • Koponen T, Karttunen J, Musialowicz T, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score and the prediction of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):428–436.
  • Ares GJ, Buonpane C, Helenowski I, et al. Outcomes and associated ethical considerations of long-run pediatric ECMO at a single center institution. Pediatric Surgery International. 2019 Mar;35(3):321–328.
  • Koerner MM, Harper MD, Gordon CK, et al. Adult cardiac veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECMO): prevention and management of acute complications. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan;8(1):66–75.
  • Distelmaier K, Schrutka L, Binder C, et al. Cardiac arrest does not affect survival in post-operative cardiovascular surgery patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Resuscitation. 2016 Jul;104:24–27.
  • Kerr KF, Brown MD, Zhu K, et al. Assessing the clinical impact of risk prediction models with decision curves: guidance for correct interpretation and appropriate use. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 20;34(21):2534–2540.
  • Bryant RJ, Sjoberg DD, Vickers AJ, et al. Predicting high-grade cancer at ten-core prostate biopsy using four kallikrein markers measured in blood in the protecT study. Jnci-Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015 Jul;107(7). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv095

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.