Advanced search
Publication Cover
Postgraduate Medicine Volume 135, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
164
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Features - Original Research

Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective study

Chao Jia Department of obstetrics, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, ChinaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6384-863XView further author information
ORCID Icon,
Meng Chena Department of obstetrics, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, ChinaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-9772View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Yichen Qinb Department of gynecology, The Third People’s Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-5433View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 38-42 | Received 23 May 2022, Accepted 19 Aug 2022, Published online: 28 Sep 2022

References

  • Corso E, Hind D, Beever D, et al. Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):91.
  • Dimassi K, Ami O, Fauck D, et al. French ambulatory cesarean: mother and newborn safety. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;148(2):198–204.
  • Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P, et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209(4):331–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.057.Epub 2013 May 30.
  • Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, Al RA. Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(4):657–663.
  • Dimassi K, Halouani A, Kammoun A, et al. The extraperitoneal French AmbUlatory cesarean section technique leads to improved pain scores and a faster maternal autonomy compared with the intraperitoneal Misgav Ladach technique: a prospective randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0245645.
  • Wallace RL, Eglinton GS, Yonekura ML. Wallace TM.Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a surgical form of infection prophylaxis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(2):172–177.
  • Zabransky F, Grossmannova H. Extraperitoneal cesarean section–an alternative or routine? Ceska gynekologie. 2001;66(3):187–189.
  • Sharma PP, Gond S, Ansari K, et al. Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective analysis. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstetrics Gynecology. 2020;9(3):1089–1091.
  • Perkins RP. Role of extraperitoneal cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(2):583–599.
  • Xia G, Huijuan G, Junying D. Clinical observation of simple extraperitoneal cesarean section in secondary cesarean section. Chin J Family Plann & Gynecotokology. 2019;11:38–40.
  • Mohr-Sasson A, Castel E, Lurie I, et al. Uterine exteriorization versus insperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(3):433–438.
  • Bates GW, Shomento S. Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):19–24.
  • Sikirica V, Broder MS, Chang E, et al. Clinical and economic impact of adhesiolysis during repeat cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(6):719–725.
  • Souza P, Braga A, Meira C, et al. Implementation of a guideline for physical therapy in the postoperative period of upper abdominal surgery reduces the incidence of atelectasis and length of hospital stay. Rev Port Pneumol. 2014;20(2):69–77.
  • Gao Y. Extraperitoneal cesarean section versus transabdominal caesarean section for pain situation of puerperas. J Pract Clin Med in Practice. 2018;22:76–78.
  • Senturk MB, Kilicci C, Doğan O, et al. Comparison of extra-peritoneal and intra-peritoneal cesarean technique: a prospective randomised trial. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2018;45(5):756–761.
  • Babita P, Vaswani A, Gopal S. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section a retrospective analysis. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;9(2):567–569.
  • Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ. Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2010(1):CD003516.
  • Polkowski M, Kuehnle E, Schippert C, et al. Neonatal and maternal short-term outcome parameters in instrument-assisted vaginal delivery compared to second stage cesarean section in labour: a retrospective 11-year analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(1):90–98.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.