New innovations and educational process in undergraduate neurology education in blended learning

References

• Jozefowicz RF. Neurophobia: the fear of neurology among medical students. Arch Neurol. 1994 Apr;51(4):328–329. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540160018003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonough A, Chishimba L, Chomba M, et al. Neurophobia in Africa: survey responses from fifteen African countries. J Neurolog Sci. 2022 Mar 15;434:120161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Zambrano D, Sandrone S, Meza-Venegas J, et al. Exploring the key factors behind neurophobia: A systematic review of the English. Brain Disord. 2021;2:100011. doi: 10.1016/j.dscb.2021.100011
   Google Scholar
• Brich J, Jost M, Brüstle P, et al. Teaching neurology to medical students with a simplified version of team-based learning. Neurology. 2017 Aug 8;89(6):616–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008 Jun;30(5):455–473. doi: 10.1080/01421590802108331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D D, Tseng DC, T Colorado-Resa JJCT. Fast assessments with digital tools using multiple-choice questions. Coll Teach. 2017;65(3):145–147. doi: 10.1080/87567555.2017.1291489
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA Cook DA JCm. Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med. 2007;7(1):37. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-1-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty I, Sharma N, Harbutt D. Contemporary and future eLearning trends in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37(1):1–3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.947925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, et al. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Vaughan ND. Blended learning in higher education: framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. 2008. doi: 10.1002/9781118269558
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel EJJJ. The inevitable reimagining of medical education. JAMA. 2020;323(12):1127–1128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll M-L. Blended learning: let’s get beyond the hype. IBM Global Services. 2002;1(4):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hege I, Tolks D, Adler M, et al. Blended learning: ten tips on how to implement it into a curriculum in healthcare education. GMS J Med Educ. 2020;37(5):Doc45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkamm K, Koch C, Dietterle J, et al. Teaching the neurologic examination: a prospective controlled study to compare a blended learning approach with face-to-face instruction. Neurology. 2021;97(20):e2032–e2038. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutcheon K, O’Halloran P, Lohan M. Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;82:30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano-Lozano M, Fernández-Lao C, Cantarero-Villanueva I, et al. A blended learning system to improve motivation, mood state, and satisfaction in undergraduate students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e17101. doi: 10.2196/17101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton CE, Saleh SN, Smith SF, et al. Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e216–e221. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan R, Learning D. Blended learning and sense of community: a comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2004;5(2):53–62. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
   Google Scholar
• Sandrone S, Schneider LDJN. Active and distance learning in neuroscience education. Neuron. 2020;106(6):895–898. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau PJPCB, Ouellette F. Establishing a computational biology flipped classroom. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(5):e1006764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulieux LE, McCracken WM, Catrambone RJERR. A taxonomy to define courses that mix face-to-face and online learning. Educ Res Rev. 2016;19:104–118. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Border S, Woodward C, Kurn O, et al. Working in creative partnership with students to co‐produce neuroanatomy e‐learning resources in a new era of blended learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(4):417–425. doi: 10.1002/ase.2090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micieli G, Cavallini A, Santalucia P, et al. Simulation in neurology. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(10):1967–1971. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2228-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manford MJPN. Undergraduate neurology in the 21st Century and the bedside tradition. Pract Neurol. 2014;14(2):72–73. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2013-000731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehta NB, Hull AL, Young JB, et al. Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1418–1423. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36a07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• More VR, Singh G, Patwardhan K, et al. Introducing hybrid problem-based learning modules in ayurveda education: results of an exploratory study. J Altern Complementary Med. 2020;26(2):130–137. doi: 10.1089/acm.2019.0293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng HL, Chen DX, Li Q, et al. Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Teach. 2020;42(12):1343–1349. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1805100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen AJN. Ways to give an effective seminar about your research project. Nature. 2019;571(7766). doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01574-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricio J, Montt J, Orsini C, et al. Student experiences of two small group learning-teaching formats: seminar and fishbowl. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 May;23(2):151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeni K, Tülek Z, Çavuşoğlu A, et al. The effect of a seminar on medical students’ information acquisition of and attitudes toward epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior: E&B. 2021 Mar;116:107720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester RA, de Kleijn RA, van Rijen HV. Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 9;16(1):200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville AJ, Norman GR. PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. Acad Med. 2007 Apr;82(4):370–374. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318033385d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JM, Gheith RH, Lowery RP, et al. Non-traditional immersive seminar enhances learning by promoting greater physiological and psychological engagement compared to a traditional lecture format. Physiol Behav. 2021 Sep 1;238:113461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DJ, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Ed. 2009 Oct;2(5):227–233. doi: 10.1002/ase.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):546–552. doi: 10.1080/01421590701583816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Moust JH. What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Acad Med. 1995 Aug;70(8):708–714. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199508000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, et al. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall S, Stephens J, Andrade T, et al. Perceptions of junior doctors and undergraduate medical students as anatomy teachers: Investigating distance along the near-peer teaching spectrum. Anat Sci Educ. 2014 May;7(3):242–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield S. The efficacy of Near-Peer Teaching in paramedicine education: a literature review. Med Sci Educator. 2021 Apr;31(2):963–968. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01192-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonagara VJ, Santhirakumaran S, Kalkat HS. The value of near-peer teaching in the medical curriculum. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:63–64. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S153240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keser Z, Rodriguez YA, Tremont J, et al. The role of residents in medical students’ neurology education: current status and future perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister W, Curtis C, Brown A, et al. Neuroscience Near-Peer-led flipped classroom improves student confidence with clinical application of content and test-taking skills. MedEdportal: J Teach Learn. 2021 Mar 25;17:11131.
   Google Scholar
• Caratelli LA, Bostwick JR, Templin T, et al. Development and evaluation of an interprofessional seminar pilot course to enhance collaboration between health professions at a student-run clinic for underserved populations. J Interprof Care. 2020 May;34(3):422–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bligh JJBMJ. Problem based, small group learning. BMJ. 1995;311(7001):342–343. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans D, Michaelsen L, et al. Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds! Med Teach. 2015;37(4):354–359. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.948828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stentoft DH. Problem-based projects in medical education: extending PBL practices and broadening learning perspectives. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2019;24(5):959–969. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09917-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Wang W, Li Z, et al. Problem-based or lecture-based learning, old topic in the new field: a meta-analysis on the effects of PBL teaching method in Chinese standardized residency training. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03254-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LWT. Assessment in the context of problem-based learning. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2019;24(5):903–914. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09909-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Phillips WR, Pinsky L, et al. A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ. 2006;40(9):867–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02544.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi-Fini I, Hajibagheri A, Adib-Hajbaghery MJN, et al. Critical thinking skills in nursing students: a comparison between freshmen and senior students. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2015;4(1). doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal25721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgess A, Matar E, Roberts C, et al. Scaffolding medical student knowledge and skills: team-based learning (TBL) and case-based learning (CBL). BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02638-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean SF. McLean SFJJome, development c. Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: a review of worldwide literature. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016;3:JMECD. S20377. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S20377
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh V, Samuel MA, Wassermann J, et al. Pharmacy educators’ views on graduate attributes and case-based learning in an undergraduate degree. 2020;12(7):893–900. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.02.013
   Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Ayton T, Mellis C. Implementation of team-based learning in year 1 of a PBL based medical program: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0550-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Rajalingam P, et al. A psychological foundation for team-based learning: knowledge reconsolidation. Acad Med. 2019;94(12):1878–1883. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Kalman E, Haq I, et al. Interprofessional team-based learning (TBL): how do students engage? BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02024-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Bleasel J, Haq I, et al. Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL? BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar K, Shaikh AA, Sajid MR, et al. Tackling student neurophobia in neurosciences block with team-based learning. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):28461. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiels L, Majmundar P, Zywot A, et al. Medical student attitudes and educational interventions to prevent neurophobia: a longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1055-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin C, Ball L, Desbrow B, et al. Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. 2012;28(7). doi: 10.14742/ajet.798
   Google Scholar
• Tubaishat A. Student nurses’ perceptions of Facebook™ as an interactive learning platform in nursing education. Contemp Nurse. 2018;54(4–5):456–471. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2018.1530944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby H, Schofield S, Mann K, et al. Education research: an exploration of case-based learning in neuroscience grand rounds using the Delphi technique. Neurology. 2012;79(3):e19–e26. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825fdfa2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Yao Y, Xie Y, et al. The process of 3D printed skull models for anatomy education. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2019;24(sup1):121–130. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1560101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmitt B, Wacker C, Ikemoto L, et al. A transparent oversight policy for human anatomical specimen management: the university of California. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):410–414. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000135
   Google Scholar
• Panesar SS, Magnetta M, Mukherjee D, et al. Patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed models for neurosurgical planning and education. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;47(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolosi F, Spena GJWN. Three-dimensional Virtual Intraoperative Reconstruction (3D VIR): a novel method to explore a virtual neurosurgical field. World Neurosurg. 2020;137:e189–e193. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SJ A, B JMV, C RWJ, et al. Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment - ScienceDirect. Comput Educ. 2017;106:150–165. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurul R, Ögün MN, Neriman Narin A, et al. An alternative method for anatomy training: immersive virtual reality. Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Sep;13(5):648–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon M, MatthieuMartin JL, Sharp L. Daniel %J advances in experimental medicine, biology. Using Interact 3D Visualisations Neuropsychiatr Educ. 2019;1138:17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Arantes M, Arantes J, Ferreira MA. Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 3;18(1):94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovitz MA, Lu S, Viswanadhan NA. Role of 3D printing and modeling to aid in neuroradiology education for medical trainees. Fed Pract: Health Care Professionals Of The VA, DoD, And PHS. 2021 Jun;38(6):256–260. doi: 10.12788/fp.0134
   Google Scholar
• Bairamian D, Liu S, Eftekhar B. Virtual reality angiogram vs 3-dimensional printed angiogram as an educational tool—A comparative study. Neurosurg. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):E343–e349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang P, Sun AX, An J, et al. 3D neural tissue models: from spheroids to bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2018 Feb;154:113–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay RH, Lesage AJC. Education. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Comput Educ. 2009;53(3):819–827. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toothaker TR. Millennial’s perspective of clicker technology in a nursing classroom: a mixed methods research study. 2018;62:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt T, Gazou A, Rieß A, et al. The impact of an audience response system on a summative assessment, a controlled field study. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberger CS. Interactive learning environment: engaging students using clickers. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2012 Mar;33(2):121–124. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruisoto P, Juanes JA. Fostering student’s engagement and active learning in neuroscience education. J Med Syst. 2019 Feb 7;43(3):66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang H, Kim KJJBME. Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):56–56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt A, Zbek EA, Ylmazel S, et al. Trends in distance education research: a content analysis of journals 2009-2013. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2015;16(1):330–363. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Shofiqul Islam M, Glinsky JV, et al. A massive open online course (MOOC) can be used to teach physiotherapy students about spinal cord injuries: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2015 Jan;61(1):21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong PGM, Pickering JD, Hendriks RA, et al. Twelve tips for integrating massive open online course content into classroom teaching. Med Teach. 2020 Apr;42(4):393–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnerton BJ, Morris NP, Hotchkiss S, et al. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jan;10(1):53–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis LO, Ikari O, Taha-Neto KA, et al. Delivery of a urology online course using moodle versus didactic lectures methods. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg S, Magnuson M. A comparison of student and faculty attitudes on the use of zoom, a video conferencing platform: A mixed-methods study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jul;54:103138. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortagy M, Abdelhameed A, Sexton P, et al. Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students’ usage and perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe RC, Scuric Z, Eshkol E, et al. Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Wu H, Cheng H, et al. Twelve tips for teaching medical students online under COVID-19. Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1854066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandrone S, Berthaud JV, Chuquilin M, et al. Neurologic and neuroscience education: mitigating neurophobia to mentor health care providers. Neurology. 2019 Jan 22;92(4):174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran R, Mukhopadhyay S, Manivannan S, et al. The effectiveness of online virtual teaching for improving neurophobia in pre-clinical medical students. Br J Neurosurg. 2022;1(36):158.
   Google Scholar
• Naciri A, Radid M, Kharbach A, et al. E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias da Silva MA, Pereira AC, Walmsley AD. The availability of open-access videos offered by dental schools. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Nov;23(4):522–526. doi: 10.1111/eje.12461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L. Assessment in neurologic education. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(4):471–478. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, et al. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013 Sep 11;13(1):123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milestones NJJGME. The neurology milestone project. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1s1):105–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, et al. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE guide No. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):e1437–e1446. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003 Sep;37(9):830–837. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boursicot KA. Structured assessments of clinical competence. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2010 Jun;71(6):342–344. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2010.71.6.48450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Gu J, Li F, et al. The effect of flipped classroom in multiple clinical skills training for clinical interns on objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE). Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2013405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckmann JG, Knossalla F, Gollwitzer S, et al. OSCE in the neurology clerkship. Experiences at the neurological department of the university hospital Erlangen. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009 Jan;77(1):32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, et al. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Internal Med. 2003 Mar 18;138(6):476–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, et al. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Internal Med. 1995 Nov 15;123(10):795–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipen E, Flynn E, Woodward-Kron R. Self-regulated learning lens on trainee perceptions of the mini-CEX: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e026796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Mooser B, et al. Influences on the implementation of Mini-CEX and DOPS for postgraduate medical trainees’ learning: A grounded theory study. Med Teach. 2019 Apr;41(4):448–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee V, Brain K, Martin J. Factors influencing Mini-CEX rater judgments and their practical implications: a systematic literature review. Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):880–887. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhoyo Y, Schönrock-Adema J, Rahayu GR, et al. Meeting international standards: a cultural approach in implementing the mini-CEX effectively in Indonesian clerkships. Med Teach. 2014 Oct;36(10):894–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amila A, Hasibuan EK, Sinurat LI. The effectiviness of Mini-Cex towards clinical competency achievement in neurological examination of clinical practice nursing students. Indones Nurs J Educa Clin (Injec). 2018;2(2):208. doi: 10.24990/injec.v2i2.159
   Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Huot S, Chung J, et al. Construct validity of the miniclinical evaluation exercise (miniCEX). J Acad Med. 2003;78(8):826–830. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebalzamani M, Farahani H, Pouryani A. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) for nursing student. J Japplenvironbiol. 2013;77(9):900–904.
   Google Scholar
• Nagendran M. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Reviews) || virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Piromchai P, Avery A, Laopaiboon M, et al. Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat. J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9(9):CD010198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010198.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fertleman C, Aubugeau-Williams P, Sher C, et al. A discussion of virtual reality as a new tool for training healthcare professionals. Front Public Health. 2018;6:44. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SG, Kim YD, Kong TY, et al. Virtual reality-based neurological examination teaching tool(VRNET) versus standardized patient in teaching neurological examinations for the medical students: a randomized, single-blind study. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 15;21(1):493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering JD, Roberts DJH. Flipped classroom or an active lecture? Clin Anat (New York, NY). 2018 Jan;31(1):118–121. doi: 10.1002/ca.22983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahyan SE. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals/Benjamin S. Bloom … [et al.]. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell J, Jhun P, Fung CC, et al. Does the flipped classroom improve learning in graduate medical education? J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Aug;9(4):491–496.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mullins ME. Curriculum Development For Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. J Acad Radiol. 2010;17(8):1070. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.017
   Google Scholar
• Lopez E. McKeachie’s teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. J Rev High Educ. 2004;27(2):283–284. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2003.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazanova D, Safdieh J. Continuing medical education in neurology. J Semin Neurol. 2018;38(4):479–485. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar