Interactions of polymeric components in a POM-based binder system for titanium metal injection moulding feedstocks

References

• Ismail MH, Muhamad N, Jumahat A, et al. Study on stability of a novel binder system based on palm stearin in metal injection moulding application. Sci Res J. 2007;4(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Min LY, Quan LX, Hua LF, et al. Effects of surfactant on properties of MIM feedstock. T Nonferr Metal Soc China. 2007;17(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat MD, Wen G, Li T, et al. Compatibility improvement of Ti-MIM feedstock using liquid surfactant. J Mater Process Technol. 2015;224:33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German RM. Powder metallurgy and particulate materials processing: the processes, materials, products, properties and applications. Sci Sinter. 2005;38(1):95–95.
   Google Scholar
• Enneti RK, Onbattuvelli VP, Gulsoy O, et al. Powder-binder formulation and compound manufacture in metal injection molding (MIM). In Handbook of metal injection molding. 2019;4:57–88.
   Google Scholar
• Subuki I, Jai J, Ismail MH, et al. Interaction between binder and powder in injection moulding of 316L stainless steel. In: R Ibrahim, MH Saleh, K Norsal, MZA Malek, MA Sulaiman, MA Baharom, editors. Advanced materials research. Malaysia: Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2014. Vol. 879, p. 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hausnerova B, Bleyan D, Kasparkova V, et al. Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools. Ceram Int. 2016;42(1):460–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghan-Manshadi A, Bermingham MJ, Dargusch MS, et al. Metal injection moulding of titanium and titanium alloys: challenges and recent development. Powder Technol. 2017;319:289–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German RM. Powder Injection Molding;.Metal Powder Industries Federation; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Cao P, Hayat MD. Feedstock technology for reactive metal injection molding: process, design, and application. Cambridge (US): Elsevier; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Patti A, Lecocq H, Serghei A, et al. The universal usefulness of stearic acid as surface modifier: applications to the polymer formulations and composite processing. J Ind Eng Chem. 2021;96:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou YH, Liu SJ, Lin ST. Superplastic behaviour of a zirconia powder-binder blend. Ceram Int. 1996;22(3):211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongpanit P, Khanthsri S, Puengboonsri S, et al. Effects of acrylic acid-grafted HDPE in HDPE-based binder on properties after injection and debinding in metal injection molding. Mater Chem Phys. 2014;147: 238–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Cano S, Momeni V, et al. Effect of increased powder–binder adhesion by backbone grafting on the properties of feedstocks for ceramic injection molding. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(17):3653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat MD, Jadhav PP, Zhang H, et al. Improving titanium injection moulding feedstock based on PEG/PPC based binder system. Powder Technol. 2018;330: 304–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye S, Mo W, Lv Y, et al. The technological design of geometrically complex Ti-6Al-4 V parts by metal injection molding. Appl Sci. 2019;997:1339–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Li D, Lu R, et al. Study of hyperbranched polymer on POM-based binder in metal injection molding. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(12);125377–125392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleyan D, Hausnerova B, Svoboda P. The development of powder injection moulding binders: a quantification of individual components’ interactions. Powder Technol. 2015;286: 84–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Cheng H, Wu J, et al. Blends of poly (propylene) and polyacetal compatibilized by ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;89(6):1471–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacharawichanant S, Siripattanasak T. Mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene/polyoxymethylene blends. Adv Chem Eng Sci. 2013;3(3): 202–205.
   Google Scholar
• Lin XD, Cheung WL. Effect of single screw extrusion through a round die on the morphology of POM/PP blends. J Mater Process Technol. 1997;63(1–3):476–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969;13(8): 1741–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabel W. Wetting theory and its application to the study and use of the surface properties of polymers. Farbe und Lack. 1971;77:997–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Kaelble DH. Dispersion-Polar surface tension properties of organic solids. J Adhes. 1970;2(2):66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford R, Sa TCKF, Banerjee S. Using a helium pycnometer as a quality tool in powder metal injection molding; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tadmor Z, Gogos CG. Principles of polymer processing. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Weir FE. Moldability of plastics based on melt rheology. Part 1—theoretical development. Polym Eng Sci. 1963;3(1):32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Park SJ, Wu Y, Heaney DF, et al. Rheological and thermal debinding behaviors in titanium powder injection molding. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2009;40:215–222.
   Google Scholar
• Lin ST, German RM. Interaction between binder and powder in injection moulding of alumina. J Mater Sci. 1994;29:5207–5212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Wang XL, Li J, et al. Polyoxymethylene/ethylene butylacrylate copolymer/ethylene-methyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate ternary blends. Polym Eng Sci. 2018;58(7):1127–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Hou A, Qu JP. Phase morphology and performance of supertough PLA/EMA-GMA/ZrP nanocomposites prepared through reactive melt-blending. ACS Omega. 2019;4(21):19046–19053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydz J, Wolna-Stypka K, Adamus G, et al. Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. part 1 - degradation studies of polylactide blends with atactic poly[(R,S)-3-hydroxybutyrate] in paraffin. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2015;29(2): 247–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann JS, Müller-Buschbaum P, Schubert DW, et al. Influence of the blend compatibility on the morphology of thin polymer blend films. J Macromol Sci Phys. 1999;38(5–6):563–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat MD, Zhang H, Karumbaiah KM, et al. A novel PEG/PMMA based binder composition for void-free metal injection moulding of Ti components. Powder Technol. 2021;382:431–440:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafrin EG, Zisman WA. Constitutive relations in the wetting of low energy surfaces and the theory of the retraction method of preparing monolayers. J Phys Chem. 1960;64(5): 519–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausnerova B. Binder systems for powder injection molding: a review. Adv Mater Proc. 2021;2(12):761–768.
   Google Scholar
• Ani SM, Muchtar A, Muhamad N, et al. Effects of injection temperature and pressure on green part density for ceramic injection molding. Adv Mat Res. 2013;622:429–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Qu X, Huang B, et al. Rheological properties of metal injection molding binder and feedstock. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China. 1997;7(3):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilovol VV, Kowalski L, Duszczyk J, et al. The effect of constitutive description of PIM feedstock viscosity in numerical analysis of the powder injection moulding process. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;178(1–3): 194–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Pan Y, Sun J, et al. A net-shape forming process of Ti–6Al–4 V sphere joints. Powder Metall. 2021;64(5):404–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar