Exploring the Intraurban Digital Divide Using Online Restaurant Reviews: A Case Study in Franklin County, Ohio

Literature Cited

• Abbate, J. 1999. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. 2009. Free: The future of a radical price. New York: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. 2004. Setting the menu. Retail Traffic February 1. http://retailtrafficmag.com/mag/retail_setting_menu/ (last accessed 16 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Badger, E. 2011. The rise of the sharing economy. The Atlantic Cities. . http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2011/12/rise-sharing-economy/769/ (last accessed 18 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., A. Hudson-Smith, R. Milton, and A. Crooks. 2010. Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution. Annals of GIS 16 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, G., and B.C. Reisdorf. 2012. The participatory web: A user perspective on Web 2.0. Information, Communication & Society 15 (4): 537–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, A., R. Gomez, and P. Willman. 2010. Online social networking and trade union membership: What the Facebook phenomenon truly means for labor organizers. Labor History 51 (1): 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister, T. 2000. Media literacy: On-ramp to the literacy of the 21st century or cul-de-sac on the information superhighway. Advances in Reading /Language Research 7:403–20.
   Google Scholar
• Connect Ohio. 2011. Consumer technology assessment for Franklin County. . http://connectohio.org/_documents/Technology_Assessment_Franklin_County_2011.pdf (last accessed 18 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cormode, G., and B. Krishnamurthy. 2008. Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday 13 (6). . http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125
   Google Scholar
• Crutcher, M., and M. Zook. 2009. Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum 40:523–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, L., and F. Wang. 2009. Mapping the digital divide in neighborhoods: Wi-Fi access in Baton Rouge, Lousiana. Annals of GIS 15 (1): 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., M. Goodchild, and D. Sui. 2012. Researching volunteered geographic information (VGI): Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esri. 2010. Business analyst dataset. . Redlands, CA: Esri.
   Google Scholar
• Esri. 2012. ArcGIS desktop: Release 10.1. . Redlands, CA: Esri.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A., and M. Metzger. 2008. The credibility of VGI. GeoJournal 72:137–48.
   Google Scholar
• Flew, T. 2003. New media. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Genovese, E., and S. Roche. 2010. Potential of VGI as a resource for SDIs in the north/south context. Geomatica 64 (4): 439–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. 2003. Digital divides in New South Wales: A research note on socio-spatial inequality using 2001 census data on computer and Internet technology. Australian Geographer 34 (2): 239–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardin, F., J. Blat, F. Calabrese, F. Dal Fiore, and C. Ratti. 2008. Digital footprinting: Uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7 (4): 36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. 2007. Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 2:24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. 2009. NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of Location Based Services 3 (2): 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. 2011. Time machines and virtual portals: The spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies 11 (3): 211–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 1999. Global grids of glass: On global cities, telecommunications and planetary urban networks. Urban Studies 36 (5–6): 929–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2001. Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities, and the urban condition. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K.N., L.S. Goulet, L. Rainie, and K. Purcell. 2011. Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. 2011. Web 2.0. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. 2011. The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy 35:715–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holohan, A., and A. Garg. 2005. Collaboration online: The example of distributed computing. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications 10 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrigan, J.B. 2008. Home broadband adoption 2008: Adoption stalls for low-income Americans even as many broadband users opt for premium services that give them more speed. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Horrigan, J.B. 2009. Obama's online opportunities II: If you build it, will they log on? Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, N., P. Pavlou, and J. Zhang. 2006. Can online word-of-mouth communication reveal true product quality? Experimental insights, econometric results, and analytical modeling. Information Systems Research 22 (2): 117–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B., B. Spigel, and E.J. Malecki. 2009. Blog links as pipelines to buzz elsewhere: The case of New York theater blogs. Environment and Planning B 37 (1): 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B.-K. 2005. Internationalizing the Internet. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. 2011. Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science 331:719–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. 2010. The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, C., and S. Winter. 2008. Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology 20 (3): 106–16.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., and J. Bernoff. 2008. Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. 2002. The economic geography of the Internet's infrastructure. Economic Geography 78 (4): 399–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, S. 2010. Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13 (4): 357–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. 2010. The data avalanche is here: Shouldn't we be digging? Journal of Regional Science 50 (1): 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummidi, L., and J. Krumm. 2008. Discovering points of interest from users’ map annotations. GeoJournal 72:215–27.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2010. Understanding the changing planet: Strategic objectives for the geographical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Negroponte, N. 1995. Being digital. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L.J. 2012. Yelp cracks down on businesses that pay for good reviews. Los Angeles Times . 19 October. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/oct/19/business/la-fi-yelp-alert-20121019 (last accessed 22 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• OpenStreetMap.2012. . http://www.openstreetmap.com (last accessed 15 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. 2005. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. . http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (last accessed 18 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. 2006. Web 2.0 compact definition: Trying again. O’Reilly Radar . 10 December. http://radar.oreilly.com/2006/12/web-20-compact-definition-tryi.html (last accessed 18 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R., and E. Neumayer. 2011. Is the Internet really new after all? The determinants of telecommunications diffusion in historical perspective. The Professional Geographer 63 (1): 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G., and N. Jurgenson. 2010. Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer.” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, K., H. Han, and T.-H. Kim. 2008. The relationships among quick-casual restaurant image, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management 27 (3): 459–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Short North. 2012. . http://theshortnorth.com/ (last accessed 17 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2010. Mobile access 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2011. Why Americans use social media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2012. Many rural AT&T customers still lack high-speed Internet despite merger promise. The Huffington Post. . http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/18/rural-att-customers-merger-lnternet_n_1914508.html (last accessed 12 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D., and D. DeLyser. 2012. Crossing the qualitative–quantitative chasm I: Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography 36 (1): 111–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and S. Wyatt. 1999. Shaping cyberspace—Interpreting and transforming the Internet. Research Policy 28 (7): 681–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warf, B. 2001. Segueways into cyberspace: Multiple geographies of the digital divide. Environment and Planning B 28:3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warf, B. 2010. The digital divide in the U.S. in the 21st century. In Overcoming digital divides: Constructing an equitable and competitive information society, ed. E. Ferro, Y. Dwivedi, J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, and M. Williams, 112–30. New York: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Weinmann, K., and A. Groth. 2011. New fast food products get tested first in Columbus. Business Insider. . http://www.businessinsider.com/how-columbus-ohio-became-the-test-market-capital-of-the-us-2011-11?op=1 (last accessed 18 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Whitacre, B., and B. Mills. 2007. Infrastructure and the rural–urban divide in high-speed resi­dential Internet access. International Regional Science Review 30 (3): 249–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. 2012. User-generated content. . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_generated_content (last accessed 15 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, I. 2010. Hello, Columbus. New York Times . 14 March. http://travel.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/travel/14headsup.html (last accessed 18 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Zook, M., M. Graham, T. Shelton, and S. Gorman. 2010. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical and Health Policy 2 (2): 7–33.
   Google Scholar