Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography

Literature Cited

• Ahern, J., R. Mc Ardle, K. E. Till, L. K. C. Manzo, and Z. A. Meletis. 2019. Supporting Women in Geography (SWIG) Ireland: Confronting the role of gender and asserting the importance of the female voice. Irish Geography 52 (1):101–22.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Geographers. 2018. Geographers by gender summary report. Accessed May 15, 2020. http://www.aag.org/galleries/disciplinary-data/Geographers_by_Gender_summary_report_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Geographers. 2019. Handbook of the American Association of Geographers. Accessed May 23, 2020. http://www.aag.org/galleries/disciplinary-data/Handbook_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L. D. 2002. “Gender equity as boundary object”: Or the same old sex and power in geography all over again? (Focus: Equity for women in geography). The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 46 (3):248–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00746.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K. 2015. The experiences of black and minority ethnic academics: A comparative study of the unequal academy. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonds, A. 2013. Racing economic geography: The place of race in economic geography. Geography Compass 7 (6):398–411. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12049.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, A. 2017. Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics 145:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brower, A., and A. James. 2020. Research performance and age explain less than half of the gender pay gap in New Zealand universities. PLoS ONE 15 (1):e0226392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., P. Hanna, J. Higham, D. Hopkins, and C. Orchiston. 2020. Gender discourses in academic mobility. Gender, Work & Organization 27 (2):149–65. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 140:139–67.
   Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., and X. Liu. 2016. How international is the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers? A social network analysis perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (2):309–29. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15611892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., and M. van Meeteren. 2019. Engaging with “urban science.” Urban Geography 40 (4):555–64. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1585138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, C., B. Falola, J. Henderson, and R. M. Torres. 2019. A long way to go: Collective paths to racial justice in geography. The Professional Geographer 71 (2):364–76. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2018.1547977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazackerley, A. 2020. Women’s research plummets during lockdown—but articles from men increase. The Guardian, May 12. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/may/12/womens-research-plummets-during-lockdown-but-articles-from-men-increase.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ramon, M. D. 2003. Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography 27 (1):1–5. doi: 10.1191/0309132503ph409xx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. 2019. Social geography I: Intersectionality. Progress in Human Geography 43 (5):937–47. doi: 10.1177/0309132517743677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., R. Harris, K. Jones, D. Manley, W. W. Wang, and L. Wolf. 2019a. Quantitative methods I: The world we have lost—Or where we started from. Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):1133–42. doi: 10.1177/0309132518774967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., R. Harris, K. Jones, D. Manley, W. W. Wang, and L. Wolf. 2019b. Quantitative methods II: How we moved on—Decades of change in philosophy, focus and methods. Progress in Human Geography 44 (5):959–71. doi: 10.1177/0309132519869451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöns, H. 2011. Transnational academic mobility and gender. Globalisation, Societies and Education 9 (2):183–209. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2011.577199.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. H., and J. E. Mapes. 2016. Where are the women? accounting for discrepancies in female doctorates in U.S. geography. The Professional Geographer 68 (3):427–35. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2015.1102030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2005. Commentary: Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography. Social & Cultural Geography 6 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1080/1464936052000335937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A. 2006. Why women of colour in geography? Gender, Place & Culture 13 (1):33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. 2002. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4):645–61. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. 2004. Beyond difference: From canonical geography to hybrid geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (4):756–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundine, J., I. L. Bourgeault, K. Glonti, E. Hutchinson, and D. Balabanova. 2019. “I don’t see gender”: Conceptualizing a gendered system of academic publishing. Social Science & Medicine 235:112388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, L. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (3):1771–800. doi: 10.1086/426800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L., and L. Peake. 1990. Women in British geography revisited: Or the same old story. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 14 (1):19–30. doi: 10.1080/03098269008709094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, M., T. Dietz, and C. Vandermotten. 2016. A perspective on problems and prospects for academic publishing in geography. Geo: Geography and Environment 3 (1):e00016. doi: 10.1002/geo2.16.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, J. 2004. Women, gender, and the histories of American geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, J., and S. Hanson. 1982. On not excluding half of the human in human geography. The Professional Geographer 34 (1):11–23. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1982.00011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake, L. J. 2016. Women in geography. In International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. A. Marston, 1–9. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Studies Association. 2019. Gender bias in peer review—Opening up the black box. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.regionalstudies.org/news/gender-bias-in-peer-review-opening-up-the-black-box/.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2004. On English as a vehicle to preserve geographical diversity. Progress in Human Geography 28 (1):1–4. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph467xx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1993. Feminism & geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarsons, H. 2017. Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. American Economic Review 107 (5):141–45. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20171126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savigny, H. 2014. Women, know your limits: Cultural sexism in academia. Gender and Education 26 (7):794–809. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.970977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr, C., M. Müller, and N. Imhof. 2020. Who makes geographical knowledge? The gender of geography’s gatekeepers. The Professional Geographer 72 (3):317–31. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1744169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. R., A. Boniche, Y. Kim, and P. L. Li. 2001. Cultural globalization, global English, and geography journals. The Professional Geographer 53 (1):1–11. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storme, T., J. R. Faulconbridge, J. V. Beaverstock, B. Derudder, and F. Witlox. 2017. Mobility and professional networks in academia: An exploration of the obligations of presence. Mobilities 12 (3):405–24. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2015.1116884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teele, D. L., and K. Thelen. 2017. Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2):433–47. doi: 10.1017/S1049096516002985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, G. 2020. Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here’s what the data say. Nature News 581 (7809):365–66. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01294-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, K. L., and M. G. Canché. 2015. Not equal for all: Gender and race differences in salary for doctoral degree recipients. Research in Higher Education 56 (7):645–72. doi: 10.1007/s11162-015-9369-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, A. H. 2019. Gender bias in rumors among professionals: An identity-based interpretation. Review of Economics and Statistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar