Literature Cited
- Alix-Garcia, J., and H. K. Gibbs. 2017. Forest conservation effects of Brazil’s zero deforestation cattle agreements undermined by leakage. Global Environmental Change 47:201–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.009.
- Angelsen, A., C. Martius, V. de Sy, A. E. Duchelle, A. M. Larson, and T. T. Pham, eds. 2018. Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
- Baccini, A., W. Walker, L. Carvalho, M. Farina, D. Sulla-Menashe, and R. A. Houghton. 2017. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358 (6360):230–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5962.
- Badgley, G., J. Freeman, J. J. Hamman, B. Haya, A. T. Trugman, W. R. L. Anderegg, and D. Cullenward. 2021. Systematic over-crediting in California’s forest carbon offsets program. Preprint. https://doi.org/http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.04.28.441870
- Bastin, J.-F., Y. Finegold, C. Garcia, D. Mollicone, M. Rezende, D. Routh, C. M. Zohner, and T. W. Crowther. 2019. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365 (6448):76–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848.
- Bayrak, M., and L. Marafa. 2016. Ten years of REDD+: A critical review of the impact of REDD + on forest-dependent communities. Sustainability 8 (7):620. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070620.
- Beymer-Farris, B. A., and T. J. Bassett. 2012. The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22 (2):332–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.006.
- Carillo Pindea, A., A. Chang, and P. Faria. 2020. Foundations for science-based net-zero target setting in the corporate sector. Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/files/foundations-for-net-zero-full-paper.pdf.
- Cavanagh, C., and T. A. Benjaminsen. 2014. Virtual nature, violent accumulation: The “spectacular failure” of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan national park. Geoforum 56:55–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.013.
- Cooke, P. 2020. The problem with big oil’s “forest fever.” Desmog, July 6. https://www.desmog.co.uk/2020/07/06/big-oil-forest-fever.
- De Haldevang, M. 2021. How Mexico’s vast tree-planting program ended up encouraging deforestation. Bloomberg Green, March 8. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-03-08/a-tree-planting-program-in-mexico-may-encourage-deforestation.
- Delabre, I., E. Boyd, M. Brockhaus, W. Carton, T. Krause, P. Newell, G. Y. Wong, and F. Zelli. 2020. Unearthing the myths of global sustainable Forest governance. Global Sustainability 3 (online). doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.11.
- Dooley, K., J. Gupta, and A. Patwardhan. 2018. INEA editorial: Achieving 1.5 °C and climate justice. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 18 (1):1-9.
- Dooley, K., and D. Stabinsky. 2018. Missing pathways to 1.5 °C: The role of the land sector in ambitious climate action. https://www.climatelandambitionrightsalliance.org/report.
- Duguma, L., L. Carvalho, P. Minang, E. Aynekulu, S. Carsan, J. Nzyoka, A. Bah, and R. Jamnadass. 2020. From tree planting to tree growing: Rethinking ecosystem restoration through trees. Working Paper No 304. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
- Ecosystem Marketplace. 2020. Voluntary carbon and the post-pandemic recovery: Forest trends. https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/carbon-markets.
- Elgin, B. 2020. These trees are not what they seem. Bloomberg Green, December 9. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-nature-conservancy-carbon-offsets-trees/.
- Ellfeldt, A. 2021. America’s biggest banks promised net zero: Will it help? Climate Wire, E&E News, March 9. https://www.eenews.net/climatewire/stories/1063726927.
- Ellis, E. C., M. Maslin, and S. Lewis. 2020. Planting trees won’t save the world. New York Times, February 12. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/opinion/trump-climate-change-trees.html.
- Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit and Oxford Net Zero. 2021. Taking stock: A global assessment of net zero targets. https://eciu.net/analysis/reports/2021/taking-stock-assessment-net-zero-targets.
- Environmental Defense Fund. n.d. Deforestation: Solved via carbon markets? Accessed August 15, 2020. https://www.edf.org/climate/deforestation-solved-carbon-markets.
- Espejo, A. B., M. C. Becerra-Leal, and N. Aguilar-Amuchastegui. 2020. Comparing the environmental integrity of emission reductions from REDD programs with renewable energy projects. Forests 11 (12):1360. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121360.
- ETH Zurich. 2019. How trees could save the climate. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190704191350.htm.
- Fagan, M. E., J. L. Reid, M. B. Holland, J. G. Drew, and R. A. Zahawi. 2020. How feasible are global Forest restoration commitments? Conservation Letters 13 (3):e12700 (online). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12700.
- Fleischman, F., S. Basant, A. Chhatre, E. A. Coleman, H. W. Fischer, D. Gupta, B. Güneralp, P. Kashwan, D. Khatri, R. Muscarella, et al. 2020. Pitfalls of tree planting show why we need people-centered natural climate solutions. BioScience, September:biaa094. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa094.
- Fleischman, F., S. Basant, H. Fischer, D. Gupta, G. Garcia Lopez, P. Kashwan, J. S. Powers, V. Ramprasad, P. Rana, A. Rastogi, et al. 2021. How politics shapes the outcomes of forest carbon finance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 51:7–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.01.007.
- Forest Trends. 2021. Is net zero investing the next frontier? Resilience Dispatch, February 9.
- Friedlingstein, P., M. Allen, J. G. Canadell, G. P. Peters, and S. I. Seneviratne. 2019. Comment on “the global tree restoration potential.” Science 366 (6463):eaay8060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8060.
- Friedman, L. 2020. A trillion trees: How one idea triumphed over Trump’s climate denialism. New York Times, February 12.
- Garson, B. 2021. Shell outlines net zero emissions plans involving ramped up offset, CCS use. Carbon Pulse, February 11. https://carbon-pulse.com/121353/.
- Goodell, J. 2020. Why planting trees won’t save us. Rolling Stone, June 25. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/tree-planting-wont-stop-climate-crisis-1020500/.
- Griscom, B. W., J. Adams, P. W. Ellis, R. A. Houghton, G. Lomax, D. A. Miteva, W. H. Schlesinger, D. Shoch, J. V. Siikamäki, P. Smith, et al. 2017. Natural climate solutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (44):11645–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114.
- Haya, B. 2019. The California Air Resources Board’s US forest offset protocol underestimates leakage. Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley. https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research/working-paper-series/policy-brief-arbas-us-forest-projects-offset-protocol-underestimates-leaka.
- Haya, B., D. Cullenward, A. L. Strong, E. Grubert, R. Heilmayr, D. A. Sivas, and M. Wara. 2020. Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: Insights from California’s standardized approach. Climate Policy 20 (9): 1112–26. 1–15.
- Heilmayr, R., C. Echeverría, and E. F. Lambin. 2020. Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity. Nature Sustainability 3 (9):701–09. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0547-0.
- Hoang, C., P. Satyal, and E. Corbera. 2019. “This is my garden”: Justice claims and struggles over forests in Vietnam’s REDD+. Climate Policy 19 (Suppl. 1):S23–S35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1527202.
- Holl, K. D., and P. H. S. Brancalion. 2020. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science 368 (6491):580–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8232.
- Howson, P. 2018. Slippery violence in the REDD + forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Conservation and Society 16 (2):136. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_150.
- Hubau, W., S. L. Lewis, O. L. Phillips, K. Affum-Baffoe, H. Beeckman, A. Cuní-Sanchez, A. K. Daniels, C. E. N. Ewango, S. Fauset, J. M. Mukinzi, et al. 2020. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579 (7797):80–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0.
- Ingalls, M. L., P. Meyfroidt, P. X. To, M. Kenney-Lazar, and M. Epprecht. 2018. The transboundary displacement of deforestation under REDD+: Problematic intersections between the trade of forest-risk commodities and land grabbing in the Mekong Region. Global Environmental Change 50:255–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.003.
- Kansanga, M. M., and I. Luginaah. 2019. Agrarian livelihoods under siege: Carbon forestry, tenure constraints and the rise of capitalist Forest enclosures in Ghana. World Development 113:131–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.002.
- Kill, J., and L. Schalatek. 2019. Funding the paradigm shift or another lost decade for forests and the climate? Heinrich Böll Stiftung North America. https://us.boell.org/en/2019/03/21/green-climate-fund-and-redd-funding-paradigm-shift-or-another-lost-decade-forests-and.
- Kuznetz, N. 2020. Exxon touts carbon capture as a climate fix, but uses it to maximize profit and keep oil flowing. Inside Climate News, September 27.
- Kyte, R. 2021. Don’t be fooled by “net zero” pledges. Washington Post, March 22.
- Larkin, A., J. Kuriakose, M. Sharmina, and K. Anderson. 2018. What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations. Climate Policy 18 (6):690–714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1346498.
- Lewis, S. L., E. T. A. Mitchard, C. Prentice, M. Maslin, and B. Poulter. 2019. Comment on “the global tree restoration potential.” Science 366 (6463):eaaz0388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz0388.
- Lipper, L., P. Thornton, B. M. Campbell, T. Baedeker, A. Braimoh, M. Bwalya, P. Caron, A. Cattaneo, D. Garrity, K. Henry, et al. 2014. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change 4 (12):1068–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2437.
- Long, H. 2020. Davos elite want to plant 1 trillion trees to help the planet, but many still fight a carbon tax. Washington Post, January 21. https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/heather-long/?utm_term=.873551ebb5ec.
- Luoma, J. 2012. China’s reforestation programs: Big success or just an illusion? Yale Environment 360. Accessed July 7, 2020. https://e360.yale.edu/features/chinas_reforestation_programs_big_success_or_just_an_illusion.
- McAfee, K. 2012. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Development and Change 43 (1):105–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01745.x.
- McAfee, K. 2021. Offsets are slowing California’s climate progress. CalMatters, March 1. https://calmatters.org/commentary/my-turn/2021/03/cap-and-trade-offsets-at-a-crossroads-in-californias-climate-policy/.
- McGraw, D. 2021. California offset investigations sat in limbo after ARB discovered violations, documents show. Carbon Pulse, March 23.
- McLaren, D. P., D. P. Tyfield, R. Willis, B. Szerszynski, and N. O. Markusson. 2019. Beyond “net-zero”: A case for separate targets for emissions reduction and negative emissions. Frontiers in Climate 1:4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2019.00004.
- Mertz, O., K. Grogan, D. Pflugmacher, G. Lestrelin, J.-C. Castella, T. Vongvisouk, C. Hett, R. Fensholt, Z. Sun, N. Berry, et al. 2018. Uncertainty in establishing forest reference levels and predicting future forest-based carbon stocks for REDD+. Journal of Land Use Science 13 (1–2):1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2017.1410242.
- Milne, S., S. Mahanty, P. To, W. Dressler, P. Kanowski, and M. Thavat. 2019. Learning from “actually existing” REDD+: A synthesis of ethnographic findings. Conservation and Society 17 (1):84. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_13.
- Moomaw, W. R., S. A. Masino, and E. K. Faison. 2019. Intact forests in the United States: Proforestation mitigates climate change and serves the greatest good. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2(June):27. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00027.
- Oliveira, G., and S. Hecht. 2016. Sacred groves, sacrifice zones and soy production: Globalization, intensification and neo-nature in South America. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (2):251–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1146705.
- Rogelj, J., O. Geden, A. Cowie, and A. Reisinger. 2021. Three ways to improve net-zero emissions targets. Nature 591 (7850):365–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3.
- Ruseva, T., J. Hedrick, G. Marland, H. Tovar, C. Sabou, and E. Besombes. 2020. Rethinking standards of permanence for terrestrial and coastal carbon: Implications for governance and sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 45:69–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.009.
- Sarmiento Barletti, J. P., and A. M. Larson. 2017. Rights abuse allegations in the context of REDD + readiness and implementation: A preliminary review and proposal for moving forward. CIFOR Infobrief No. 190. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
- Seddon, N., S. Sengupta, M. García-Espinosa, I. Hauler, D. Herr, and A. R. Rizvi. 2019. Nature-based solutions in nationally determined contributions. Gland: IUCN; Oxford: University of Oxford. https://www.naturebasedsolutionsinitiative.org/policy-briefs/.
- Seddon, N., A. Smith, P. Smith, I. Key, A. Chausson, C. Girardin, J. House, S. Srivastava, and B. Turner. 2021. Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Global Change Biology 27 (8):1518–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15513.
- Sekera, J., and A. Lichtenberger. 2020. Assessing carbon capture: Public policy, science, and societal need: A review of the literature on industrial carbon removal. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability 5 (3):14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-020-00080-5.
- Sengupta, S. 2019. Restoring forests could help put a brake on global warming, study finds. New York Times, July 5. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/05/climate/trees-forests-climate-change.html.
- Seymour, F., and P. Langer. 2021. Consideration of nature-based solutions as offsets in corporate climate change mitigation strategies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institution. https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/consideration-nature-based-solutions-offsets-corporate-climate-change-mitigation-strategies.pdf.
- Shankleman, J., and A. Rathi. 2021. Mark Carneyʼs Brookfield net-zero claim confounds climate experts. Bloomberg, February 25. New York: Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-25/mark-carney-s…c7516a2f43bdd3db050661f4bee4db&esrc=&utm_term=TNY_ClimateCrisis.
- Song, L. 2019. Why carbon credits for forest preservation may be worse than nothing. ProPublica, May 22. https://features.propublica.org/brazil-carbon-offsets/inconvenient-truth-carbon-credits-dont-work-deforestation-redd-acre-cambodia/.
- Stabinsky, D. 2021. Chasing carbon unicorns: The deceptions of carbon markets and “net zero.” Amsterdam: Friends of The Earth International. https://www.foei.org/resources/publications/chasing-carbon-unicorns-carbon-markets-net-zero-report.
- Task Force on Scaling the Voluntary Carbon Market. 2020. Task Force on Scaling the Voluntary Carbon Market. https://www.iif.com/Portals/1/Files/TSVCM_Consultation_Document.pdf.
- Terrer, C., R. P. Phillips, B. A. Hungate, J. Rosende, J. Pett-Ridge, M. E. Craig, K. J. van Groenigen, T. F. Keenan, B. N. Sulman, B. D. Stocker, et al. 2021. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2. Nature 591 (7851):599–603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03306-8.
- Thamo, T., and D. J. Pannell. 2016. Challenges in developing effective policy for soil carbon sequestration: Perspectives on additionality, leakage, and permanence. Climate Policy 16 (8):973–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075372.
- Trexxler, M. 2020. Expanding offset markets: Great idea or willful blindness? GHG Management Institute. Accessed August 2, 2021. https://ghginstitute.org/2020/12/10/expanding-offset-markets-great-idea-or-willful-blindness/
- Vander Velde, B., Veldman, J. W., J. C. Aleman, S. T. Alvarado, T. M. Anderson, S. Archibald, W. J. Bond, T. W. Boutton, N. Buchmann, E. Buisson, J. G. Canadell, et al. 2019. Comment on “the global tree restoration potential.” Science 366 (6463):eaay7976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay7976.
- Wara, M. 2018. Measuring the clean development mechanism’s performance and potential. UCLA Law Review 55:1760–1803.
- Waring, B., M. Neumann, I. C. Prentice, M. Adams, P. Smith, and M. Siegert. 2020. Forest and decarbonization—Roles of natural and planted forests. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3:58. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00058.
- Wear, D. N., and B. C. Murray. 2004. Federal timber restrictions, interregional spillovers, and the impact on US softwood markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (2):307–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00081-0.
- West, T. A. P., J. Börner, E. O. Sills, and A. Kontoleon. 2020. Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD + projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (39):24188–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004334117.
- World Bank. 2020. State and trends of carbon pricing 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33809.
- Zwick, S. 2021. Decades-old disagreements to dominate final months of Carney-led offset taskforce. Carbon Pulse, March 31. https://carbon-pulse.com/125343.