483
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Competition, Integration, or Complementation? Exploring Dock-Based Bike-Sharing in New York City

Pages 65-75 | Received 06 Aug 2021, Accepted 17 Apr 2022, Published online: 28 Jul 2022

Literature Cited

  • Arthur, D., and S. Vassilvitskii. 2007. K-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Symposiumon Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 1027–35. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  • Ashraf, M. T., M. A. Hossen, K. Dey, S. El-Dabaja, M. Aljeri, and B. Naik. 2021. Impacts of bike sharing program on subway ridership in New York City. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2675 (9):924–34. doi: 10.1177/03611981211004980.
  • Campbell, K. B., and C. Brakewood. 2017. Sharing riders: How bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 100:264–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.017.
  • Chen, R. 2019. “Bike litter” and obligations of the platform operators: Lessons from China’s dockless sharing bikes. Computer Law & Security Review 35 (5):105317. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.011.
  • Chen, X., A. Zhang, H. Wang, A. Gallaher, and X. Zhu. 2021. Compliance and containment in social distancing: Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 across townships. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35 (3):446–65. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2021.1873999.
  • Chen, Y., Y. Zhang, D. M. Coffman, and Z. Mi. 2022. An environmental benefit analysis of bike sharing in New York City. Cities 121:103475. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103475.
  • Chen, Z., D. van Lierop, and D. Ettema. 2020. Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications? Transport Reviews 40 (3):333–53. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2019.1710306.
  • Cheng, P., J. Hu, Z. Yang, Y. Shu, and J. Chen. 2019. Utilization-aware trip advisor in bike-sharing systems based on user behavior analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 31 (9):1822–35. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2867197.
  • Chiariotti, F., C. Pielli, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi. 2018. A dynamic approach to rebalancing bike-sharing systems. Sensors 18 (2):512. doi: 10.3390/s18020512.
  • Citi Bike. 2018a. City Bike station map. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://member.citibikenyc.com/map.
  • Citi Bike. 2018b. City Bike system data. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.citibikenyc.com/system-data.
  • Citi Bike. 2020. About Citi Bike. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.citibikenyc.com/about.
  • Citi Bike. 2021. Community programs. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://ride.citibikenyc.com/community-programs.
  • Citi Bike. 2022. Pricing. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://citibikenyc.com/pricing.
  • City of New York. 2017. The ins and outs of NYC commuting. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/planning-level/housing-economy/nyc-ins-and-out-of-commuting.pdf.
  • D’Almeida, L., T. Rye, and F. Pomponi. 2021. Emissions assessment of bike sharing schemes: The case of Just Eat Cycles in Edinburgh. UK. Sustainable Cities and Society 71:103012. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103012.
  • DeMaio, P. 2009. Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation 12 (4):41–56. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., N. Eluru, A. M. El-Geneidy, M. Rabbat, and U. Haq. 2014. How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: Evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of Transport Geography 41:306–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.013.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., R. Hampshire, L. Marla, and N. Eluru. 2017. An empirical analysis of bike sharing usage and rebalancing: Evidence from Barcelona and Seville. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 97:177–91.
  • Feng, Y., R. C. Affonso, and M. Zolghadri. 2017. Analysis of bike sharing system by clustering: The Vélib’case. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50 (1):12422–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2430.
  • Fishman, E., S. Washington, N. Haworth, and A. Mazzei. 2014. Barriers to bikesharing: An analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane. Journal of Transport Geography 41:325–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.005.
  • García-Palomares, J. C., J. Gutiérrez, and M. Latorre. 2012. Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: A GIS approach. Applied Geography, 35 (1–2):235–46. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.002.
  • Ghosh, S., and P. Varakantham. 2017. Incentivizing the use of bike trailers for dynamic repositioning in bike sharing systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling 27 (1):373–81.
  • Graehler, M., R. A. Mucci, and G. D. Erhardt. 2019. Understanding the recent transit ridership decline in major US cities: Service cuts or emerging modes. Paper presented at the 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  • Guo, Y., J. Zhou, Y. Wu, and Z. Li. 2017. Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China. PLoS ONE 12 (9):e0185100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185100.
  • Habib, K. N., J. Mann, M. Mahmoud, and A. Weiss. 2014. Synopsis of bicycle demand in the city of Toronto: Investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 70:67–80.
  • Hochmair, H. H. 2015. Assessment of bicycle service areas around transit stations. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 9 (1):15–29. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2012.719998.
  • Kim, D., H. Shin, H. Im, and J. Park. 2012. Factors influencing travel behaviors in bikesharing. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 91st annual meeting, Washington, DC.
  • Kim, K. 2018. Investigation on the effects of weather and calendar events on bike-sharing according to the trip patterns of bike rentals of stations. Journal of Transport Geography 66:309–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.001.
  • Kong, H., S. T. Jin, and D. Z. Sui. 2020. Deciphering the relationship between bikesharing and public transit: Modal substitution, integration, and complementation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 85:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102392.
  • Lee, J., K. Choi, and Y. Leem. 2016. Bicycle-based transit-oriented development as an alternative to overcome the criticisms of the conventional transit-oriented development. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 10 (10):975–84. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2014.923547.
  • Lee, R. J., I. N. Sener, and S. N. Jones. 2017. Understanding the role of equity in active transportation planning in the United States. Transport Reviews 37 (2):211–26. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1239660.
  • Legros, B. 2019. Dynamic repositioning strategy in a bike-sharing system: How to prioritize and how to rebalance a bike station. European Journal of Operational Research 272 (2):740–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.051.
  • Li, A., K. Gao, P. Zhao, X. Qu, and K. W. Axhausen. 2021. High-resolution assessment of environmental benefits of dockless bike-sharing systems based on transaction data. Journal of Cleaner Production 296:126423. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126423.
  • Li, Y., Y. Zheng, H. Zhang, and L. Chen. 2015. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems 33 (1):1–10.
  • Lin, J.-R., T.-H. Yang, and Y.-C. Chang. 2013. A hub location inventory model for bicycle sharing system design: Formulation and solution. Computers & Industrial Engineering 65 (1):77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.006.
  • Liu, Z., X. Jia, and W. Cheng. 2012. Solving the last mile problem: Ensure the success of public bicycle system in Beijing. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 43:73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.079.
  • Lu, W., D. M. Scott, and R. Dalumpines. 2018. Understanding bike share cyclist route choice using GPS data: Comparing dominant routes and shortest paths. Journal of Transport Geography 71:172–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.012.
  • Luo, H. 2019. Environmental impact assessment and improved design of bike sharing system from the life cycle perspective. Master’sthesis, Purdue University.
  • Luo, H., F. Zhao, W.-Q. Chen, and H. Cai. 2020. Optimizing bike sharing systems from the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 117:102705. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102705.
  • Ma, T., C. Liu, and S. Erdoğan. 2015. Bicycle sharing and public transit: Does Capital Bikeshare affect Metrorail ridership in Washington, DC? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2534 (1):1–9. doi: 10.3141/2534-01.
  • Ma, X., R. Cao, and Y. Jin. 2019. Spatiotemporal clustering analysis of bicycle sharing system with data mining approach. Information 10 (5):163. doi: 10.3390/info10050163.
  • MacQueen, J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1 (14):281–97.
  • Martinez, L. M., L. Caetano, T. Eiró, and F. Cruz. 2012. An optimisation algorithm to establish the location of stations of a mixed fleet biking system: An application to the city of Lisbon. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 54:513–24. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.769.
  • Martinez, M. 2017. The impact weather has on NYC Citi Bike share company activity. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics at Colby 4 (1):12.
  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority. 2022. Fares. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://new.mta.info/fares.
  • Miranda-Moreno, L. F., and T. Nosal. 2011. Weather or not to cycle: Temporal trends and impact of weather on cycling in an urban environment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2247 (1):42–52. doi: 10.3141/2247-06.
  • Moorthy, A., R. De Kleine, G. Keoleian, J. Good, and G. Lewis. 2017. Shared autonomous vehicles as a sustainable solution to the last mile problem: A case study of Ann Arbor-Detroit area. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars: Electronic and Electrical Systems 10 (2):328–36. doi: 10.4271/2017-01-1276.
  • Nankervis, M. 1999. The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 (6):417–31. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00022-6.
  • New York City Department of Motor Vehicles. 2018. Vehicle registrations in force. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://dmv.ny.gov/statistic/2018reginforce-web.pdf.
  • New York City Department of Transportation. 2013. NYC bike share: Designed by New Yorkers. Accessed March 11, 2022. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/bike-share-outreach-report.pdf.
  • New York City Department of Transportation. 2018. New York City mobility report. Accessed March 11, 2022. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/mobility-report-2018-screen-optimized.pdf.
  • NYC OpenData. 2020. Traffic volume counts (2014–2019). Accessed March 11, 2022. https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Transportation/Traffic-Volume-Counts-2014-2019-/ertz-hr4r.
  • O’Mahony, E., and D. Shmoys. 2015. Data analysis and optimization for (citi) bike sharing. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 29 (1):687–94. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9245.
  • Pase, F., F. Chiariotti, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi. 2020. Bike sharing and urban mobility in a post-pandemic world. IEEE Access 8:187291–306. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030841.
  • Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, and V. Dubourg. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12:2825–30.
  • Pucher, J., J. Dill, and S. Handy. 2010. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine 50:S106–S125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028.
  • Rixey, R. A. 2013. Station-level forecasting of bikesharing ridership: Station network effects in three US systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2387 (1):46–55. doi: 10.3141/2387-06.
  • Saberi, M., M. Ghamami, Y. Gu, M. H. S. Shojaei, and E. Fishman. 2018. Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sharing mobility patterns: A case of tube strike in London. Journal of Transport Geography 66:154–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.018.
  • Scheiner, J. 2010. Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: Trends in Germany 1976–2002. Journal of Transport Geography 18 (1):75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.001.
  • Schneider, T. W. 2016. A tale of twenty-two million Citi bike rides: Analyzing the NYC bike share system. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://toddwschneider.com/posts/a-tale-of-twenty-two-million-citi-bikes-analyzing-the-nyc-bike-share-system/.
  • Schoner, J. E., and D. M. Levinson. 2014. The missing link: Bicycle infrastructure networks and ridership in 74 US cities. Transportation 41 (6):1187–1204. doi: 10.1007/s11116-014-9538-1.
  • Sears, J., B. S. Flynn, L. Aultman-Hall, and G. S. Dana. 2012. To bike or not to bike: Seasonal factors for bicycle commuting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2314 (1):105–11. doi: 10.3141/2314-14.
  • Shaheen, S., and N. Chan. 2016. Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment 42 (4):573–88. doi: 10.2148/benv.42.4.573.
  • Shaheen, S. A., S. Guzman, and H. Zhang. 2010. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2143 (1):159–67. doi: 10.3141/2143-20.
  • Singleton, P. A., and K. J. Clifton. 2014. Exploring synergy in bicycle and transit use: Empirical evidence at two scales. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2417 (1):92–102. doi: 10.3141/2417-10.
  • Taylor, D., and H. Mahmassani. 1996. Analysis of stated preferences for intermodal bicycle-transit interfaces. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1556 (1):86–95. doi: 10.1177/0361198196155600111.
  • Thorndike, R. L. 1953. Who belongs in the family? Psychometrika 18 (4):267–76. doi: 10.1007/BF02289263.
  • Ullman, E. L., and R. R. Boyce. 1980. Geography as spatial interaction. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Xu, H., J. Ying, F. Lin, and Y. Yuan. 2013. Station segmentation with an improved K-means algorithm for Hangzhou public bicycle system. Journal of Software 8 (9):2289–96. doi: 10.4304/jsw.8.9.2289-2296.
  • Zhang, Y., and Z. Mi. 2018. Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Applied Energy 220:296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101.
  • Zhang, Y., and Y. Zhang. 2018. Associations between public transit usage and bikesharing behaviors in the United States. Sustainability 10 (6):1868. doi: 10.3390/su10061868.
  • Zuo, T., H. Wei, and A. Rohne. 2018. Determining transit service coverage by non-motorized accessibility to transit: Case study of applying GPS data in Cincinnati metropolitan area. Journal of Transport Geography 67:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.