362
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Constructing (Im)Perfect Geographical Knowledge: Negotiating Positionality in Comparative Field Sites

Pages 776-786 | Received 20 Apr 2022, Accepted 27 Nov 2022, Published online: 27 Feb 2023

Literature Cited

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 1986. Veiled sentiments: Honor and poetry in a Bedouin society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Abu-Lughod, L. 2002. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist 104 (3):783–90. doi: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783.
  • Alcoff, L. 1991. The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique 20 (20):5–32. doi: 10.2307/1354221.
  • Anderson, K., and S. Smith. 2001. Editorial: Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (1):7–10. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00002.
  • Bennett, A. 2003. The use of insider knowledge in ethnographic research on contemporary youth music scenes. In Researching youth, ed. A. Bennett, M. Cieslik and S. Miles, 186–200. London: Palgrave.
  • Bondi, L. 2003. Empathy and identification: Conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2 (1):64–76.
  • Bondi, L. 2014. Understanding feelings: Engaging with unconscious communication and embodied knowledge. Emotion, Space and Society 10:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2013.03.009.
  • Brenner, N. 2004. New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, L., and F. K. Boardman. 2011. Accessing the field: Disability and the research process. Social Science & Medicine 72 (1):23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.050.
  • Cahill, C. 2007. The personal is political: Developing new subjectivities through participatory action research. Gender, Place and Culture 14 (3):267–92. doi: 10.1080/09663690701324904.
  • Caretta, M. A., and J. C. Jokinen. 2017. Conflating privilege and vulnerability: A reflexive analysis of emotions and positionality in postgraduate fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 69 (2):275–83. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1252268.
  • Carstensen-Egwuom, I. 2014. Connecting intersectionality and reflexivity: Methodological approaches to social positionalities. Erkunde 68:256–76.
  • Carter, C., J. L. Lapum, L. F. Lavallee, and M. L. Schindel. 2014. Explicating positionality: A journey of dialogical and reflexive storytelling. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 13 (1):362–76. doi: 10.1177/160940691401300118.
  • Chacko, E. 2004. Positionality and praxis: Fieldwork experiences in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 25 (1):51–63. doi: 10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x.
  • Chari, S. 2003. Marxism, sarcasm, ethnography: Geographical fieldnotes from South India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24 (2):169–83. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00150.
  • Chatterton, P., S. Hodkinson, and J. Pickerill. 2010. Beyond scholar activism: Making strategic interventions inside and outside the neoliberal university. Acme: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 9 (2):245–75.
  • Chaudhry, L. N. 1997. Researching “my people” researching myself: Fragments of a reflexive tale. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 10 (4):441–53. doi: 10.1080/095183997237025.
  • Chiener, C. 2002. Experience and fieldwork: A native researcher’s view. Ethnomusicology 46 (3):456–86. doi: 10.2307/852719.
  • Chiswell, H., and R. Wheeler. 2016. “As long as you’re easy on the eye”: Reflecting on issues of positionality and researcher safety during farmer interviews. Area 48 (2):229–35. doi: 10.1111/area.12257.
  • Christians, C. G. 2011. Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 61–81. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Clark, G. L. 1998. Stylized facts and close dialogue: Methodology in economic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (1):73–87. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00085.
  • Cloke, P., P. Cooke, J. Cursons, P. Milbourne, and R. Widdowfield. 2000. Ethics, reflexivity and research: Encounters with homeless people. Ethics, Place & Environment 3 (2):133–54. doi: 10.1080/713665889.
  • Cupples, J. 2002. The field as a landscape of desire: Sex and sexuality in geographical fieldwork. Area 34 (4):382–90. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00095.
  • Cupples, J., and S. Kindon. 2003. Far from being “home alone”: The dynamics of accompanied fieldwork. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24 (2):211–28. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00153.
  • Davidson, J., and C. Milligan. 2004. Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social and Cultural Geography 5 (4):521–32.
  • Davies, B., and P. Bansel. 2005. The time of their lives? Academic workers in neoliberal time(s). Health Sociology Review 14 (1):47–58. doi: 10.5172/hesr.14.1.47.
  • Davies, C. A. 2008. Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London and New York: Routledge.
  • De Feliciantonio, C. 2017. Queering communia: The politics of positionality when doing research on squatting in Rome. Gender, Place and Culture 24:426–37.
  • DeLuca, J. R., and C. B. Maddox. 2016. Tales from the ethnographic field navigating feelings of guilt and privilege in the research process. Field Methods 28 (3):284–99. doi: 10.1177/1525822X15611375.
  • DeLyser, D. 2001. Do you really live here? Thoughts on insider research. Geographical Review 19 (1–2):441–53.
  • Denzin, N. 1970. The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. London: Butterworths.
  • De Silva, M., and K. Gandhi. 2019. “Daughter” as a positionality and the gendered politics of taking parents into the field. Area 51 (4):662–69. doi: 10.1111/area.12525.
  • Dewsbury, J. D., and S. Naylor. 2002. Practising geographical knowledge: Fields, bodies and dissemination. Area 34 (3):253–60. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00079.
  • Dillard, C. B. 2006. When the music changes, so should the dance: Cultural and spiritual considerations in paradigm “proliferation.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19 (1):59–76. doi: 10.1080/09518390500450185.
  • Dutta, M. 2020. Turning productive failures into creative possibilities: Women workers shaping fieldwork methods in Tamil Nadu, India. Geographical Review 110 (1–2):145–59. doi: 10.1111/gere.12337.
  • Edwards, B. 2002. Deep insider research. Qualitative Research Journal 2 (1):71–84.
  • England, K. V. 1994. Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):80–89. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x.
  • Fisher, K. T. 2015. Positionality, subjectivity, and race in transnational and transcultural geographical research. Gender, Place and Culture 22:456–73.
  • Foley, D. E. 2002. Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 15 (4):469–90. doi: 10.1080/09518390210145534.
  • Frazier, E. 2020. When fieldwork “fails”: Participatory visual methods and fieldwork encounters with resettled refugees. Geographical Review 110 (1–2):133–44. doi: 10.1111/gere.12344.
  • Ganga, D., and S. Scott. 2006. Cultural “insiders” and the issue of positionality in qualitative migration research: Moving “across” and moving “along” researcher-participant divides. Qualitative Social Research 7:7. doi: 10.17169/fqs-7.3.134.
  • Gilbert, M. 1994. The politics of location: Doing feminist research at “home.” The Professional Geographer 46 (1):90–96. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00090.x.
  • Gill, R. 2009. Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections, ed. R. Flood and R. Gill, 228–44. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Glesne, C. 2007. Research as solidarity. In Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge, ed. N. K. Denzin and M. D. Giardina, 169–78. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Griffiths, M. 2017. From heterogeneous worlds: Western privilege, class and positionality in the South. Area 49 (1):2–8. doi: 10.1111/area.12277.
  • Hammersely, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Haniff, N. Z. 1985. Toward a native anthropology: Methodological notes on a study of successful Caribbean women by an insider. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly 10 (4):107–13. doi: 10.1525/ahu.1985.10.4.107.
  • Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
  • Harrowell, E., T. Davies, and T. Disney. 2018. Making space for failure in geographic research. The Professional Geographer 70 (2):230–38. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1347799.
  • Hart, G. 2002. Disabling globalization: Places of power in post-apartheid South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Herriott, R. E., and W. A. Firestone. 1983. Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher 12 (2):14–19. doi: 10.3102/0013189X012002014.
  • Hopkins, P. E. 2009. Women, men, positionalities and emotion: Doing feminist geographies of religion. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 8 (1):1–17.
  • Hsiung, P. 1996. Between bosses and workers: The dilemma of a keen observer and a vocal feminist. In Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork, ed. D. L. Wolf, 122–37. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Hyndman, J. 2001. The field as here and now, not there and then. Geographical Review 91 (1–2):262–72. doi: 10.2307/3250827.
  • Jemielniak, D., and M. Kostera. 2010. Narratives of irony and failure in ethnographic work. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de L’Administration 27 (4):335–47. doi: 10.1002/cjas.177.
  • Johnsen, S., and S. Fitzpatrick. 2022. Faith, values, and metaphysical positionality in qualitative research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (1):229–42. doi: 10.1111/tran.12487.
  • Jones, P. J., and J. Evans. 2011. Creativity and project management: A comic. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 10 (3):585–632.
  • Kaspar, H., and S. Landolt. 2016. Flirting in the field: Shifting positionalities and power relations in innocuous sexualisations of research encounters. Gender, Place and Culture 23 (1):107–19. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2014.991704.
  • Katz, C. 1994. Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):67–72. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x.
  • Kim, J. Y. 2011. Does spatial clustering of foreign direct investment foster global production networks? The case of Qingdao, China. European Planning Studies 19 (1):63–76. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.530392.
  • Kobayashi, A. 1994. Coloring the field: Gender, “race,” and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):73–80. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00073.x.
  • Kobayashi, A. 2003. GPC ten years on: Is self-reflexivity enough? Gender, Place and Culture 10 (4):345–49. doi: 10.1080/0966369032000153313.
  • Krieger, S. 1985. Beyond subjectivity: The use of the self in social science. Qualitative Sociology 8 (4):309–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00988842.
  • Kusek, W. A., and S. L. Smiley. 2014. Navigating the city: Gender and positionality in cultural geography research. Journal of Cultural Geography 31 (2):152–65. doi: 10.1080/08873631.2014.906852.
  • Lal, J. 1996. Situating locations: The politics of self, identity and “other” in living and writing the texts. In Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork, ed. D. Wolf, 185–214. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Lather, P. 2001. Postmodernism, post-structuralism and post (critical) ethnography: Of ruins, aporias and angels. In Handbook of ethnography, ed. P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, 477–92. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Madison, S. D. 2005. Critical ethnography: Method, ethnics and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Massey, D. 2007. World city. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • McDowell, L. 1999. Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • McFarlane, C. 2008. Governing the contaminated city: Sanitation in colonial and postcolonial Bombay. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2):415–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00793.x.
  • McFarlane, C. 2010. The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (4):725–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00917.x.
  • McFarlane, C., J. Silver, and Y. Truelove. 2017. Cities within cities: Intra-urban comparison of infrastructure in Mumbai, Delhi and Cape Town. Urban Geography 38 (9):1393–1417. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1243386.
  • McGarry, O. 2016. Repositioning the research encounter: Exploring power dynamics and positionality in youth research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 19 (3):339–54. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1011821.
  • Mellor, J., N. Ingram, J. Abrahams, and P. Beedell. 2014. Class matters in the interview setting? Positionality, situatedness and class. British Educational Research Journal 40 (1):135–49. doi: 10.1002/berj.3035.
  • Miled, N. 2019. Muslim researcher researching Muslim youth: Reflexive notes on critical ethnography, positionality and representation. Ethnography and Education 14 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1080/17457823.2017.1387063.
  • Moser, S. 2008. Personality: A new positionality? Area 40 (3):383–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00815.x.
  • Moss, P. 2002. Feminist geography in practice: Research and methods. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Moss, P. 2014. Some rhizomatic recollections of a feminist geographer: Working toward an affirmative politics. Gender, Place and Culture 21 (7):803–12. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2014.939159.
  • Muhammed, M., N. Wallerstein, A. L. Sussman, M. Avila, L. Belone, and B. Duran. 2015. Reflections on researcher identity and power: The impact of positionality on community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and outcomes. Critical Sociology 41:1048–63.
  • Mullings, B. 1999. Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30:337–50. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00025-1.
  • Nairn, K., J. Munro, and A. B. Smith. 2005. A counter-narrative of a “failed” interview. Qualitative Research 5 (2):221–44. doi: 10.1177/1468794105050836.
  • Nast, H. 1994. Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):54–66. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x.
  • Pickvance, C. 1995. Comparative analysis, causality and case studies in urban studies. In The urban context: Ethnicity, social networks and situational analysis, ed. A. Rogers and S. Vertovec, 35–54. Oxford, UK: Berg.
  • Robertson, J. 2002. Reflexivity redux: A pithy polemic on “positionality.” Anthropological Quarterly 75 (4):785–92. doi: 10.1353/anq.2002.0066.
  • Robinson, J. 2002. Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (3):531–54. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00397.
  • Robinson, J. 2016. Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography 40 (1):3–29. doi: 10.1177/0309132515598025.
  • Rose, G. 1997. Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3):305–20. doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122.
  • Rossman, G. B., and S. F. Rallis. 1998. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Roulston, K. 2014. Interactional problems in research interviews. Qualitative Research 14 (3):277–93. doi: 10.1177/1468794112473497.
  • Roy, A. 2009. The 21st-century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies 43 (6):819–30. doi: 10.1080/00343400701809665.
  • Ruwanpura, K. N. 2022. Garments without guilt? Global labour justice and ethical codes in Sri Lankan apparels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Segall, A. 2001. Critical ethnography and the invocation of voice: From the field/in the field—Single exposure, double standard? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 14 (4):579–92. doi: 10.1080/09518390110047084.
  • Sharp, J., K. Browne, and D. Thien. 2004. Geography and gender reconsidered. Royal Geographical Society, Institute of British Geographers, Women and Geography Study Group.
  • Sidaway, J. D. 1992. Other worlds: On the politics of research by “First World” geographers in the “Third World.” Area 24:403–08.
  • Sidaway, J. D. 2000. Recontextualising positionality: Geographical research and academic fields of power. Antipode 32 (3):260–70. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00134.
  • Simmons, M. 2007. Insider ethnography: Tinker, tailor, researcher or spy? Nurse Researcher 14 (4):7–17. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.07.14.4.7.c6039.
  • Skelton, T. 2001. Cross-cultural research: Issues of power, positionality and “race.” In Qualitative methods for geographers: Issues and debate, ed. C. Limb and M. Dwyer, 87–100. London: Arnold.
  • Sprague, J. 2005. Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  • Stacey, J. 1996. Can there be a feminist ethnography? In Feminism and social change: Bridging theory and practice, ed. H. Gottfried, 88–101. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  • Staeheli, L., and V. Lawson. 1994. A discussion of “women in the field”: The politics of feminist fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):96–102. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00096.x.
  • Stefan, M. 2010. A CV of failures. Nature 468 (7322):467. doi: 10.1038/nj7322-467a.
  • Sultana, F. 2007. Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 6 (3):374–85.
  • Tarrant, A. 2014. Negotiating multiple positionalities in the interview setting: Researching across gender and generational boundaries. The Professional Geographer 66 (3):493–500. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2013.805621.
  • Taylor, J. 2011. The intimate insider: Negotiating the ethics of friendship when doing insider research. Qualitative Research 11 (1):3–22. doi: 10.1177/1468794110384447.
  • Tembo, F. 2003. Multiple identities, representations and categorisations: Experiences in the study of people’s life-worlds in rural Malawi. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24 (2):229–41. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00154.
  • Till, K. E. 2001. Returning home and to the field. Geographical Review 91 (1–2):46–56. doi: 10.2307/3250804.
  • Tregaskis, C., and D. Goodley. 2005. Disability research by disabled and non-disabled people: Towards a relational methodology of research production. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (5):363–74. doi: 10.1080/13645570500402439.
  • Turgo, N. N. 2012. A “balikbayan” in the field: Scaling and (re)producing insider’s identity in a Philippine fishing community. Qualitative Research 12 (6):666–85. doi: 10.1177/1468794111433006.
  • Twyman, C., J. Morrison, and D. Sporton. 1999. The final fifth: Autobiography, reflexivity and interpretation in cross-cultural research. Area 31 (4):313–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.1999.tb00098.x.
  • Ward, K. 2008. Commentary: Toward a comparative (re)turn in urban studies? Some reflections. Urban Geography 29 (5):405–10. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.29.5.405.
  • Ward, K. 2010. Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography 34 (4):471–87. doi: 10.1177/0309132509350239.
  • Watson, E. E. 2004. “What a dolt one is”: Language learning and fieldwork in geography. Area 36 (1):59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00324.x.
  • Weinstein, D. 2000. Heavy metal: The music and its culture. London: Da Capo Press.
  • Whitson, R. 2017. Painting pictures of ourselves: Researcher subjectivity in the practice of feminist reflexivity. The Professional Geographer 69 (2):299–306. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208510.
  • Wiederhold, A. 2015. Conducting fieldwork at and away from home: Shifting researcher positionality with mobile interviewing methods. Qualitative Research 15 (5):600–15. doi: 10.1177/1468794114550440.
  • Yeung, H. W. C. 2003. Practicing new economic geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93:442–62.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.