The Gallery of Possibilities

Literature Cited

• Anti-Eviction Mapping Project. n.d. Anti-Eviction Mapping Project. Accessed February 24, 2023. https://antievictionmap.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. M., and R. Shabazz. 2014. Gender and sexual geographies of Blackness: New Black cartographies of resistance and survival (part 2). Gender, Place and Culture 21 (4):449–52. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2013.786303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2020. Map icon design. In The geographic information science and technology body of knowledge, ed. J. P. Wilson. Ithaca: University Consortium for Geographic Information Science. doi: 10.22224/gistbok/2020.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. doi: 10.1093/sf/soz162.
   Google Scholar
• Bley, K., K. Caldwell, M. Kelly, J. Loyd, R. E. Roth, T. M. Anderson, A. Bonds, J. Plevin, D. Madison, C. Spencer, et al. 2022. A design challenge for transforming justice. GeoHumanities 8 (1):344–65. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2021.1986100.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, A. 2020. Cartographic efficacy: Histories of the present, participatory futures. PhD diss., University of Kentucky. doi: 10.13023/etd.2020.491.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., and L. Knopp. 2008. Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (1):40–58. doi: 10.1080/00045600701734042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIVIC. 2020. Structured context program. Accessed November 24, 2020. https:/civicsoftwarefoundation.org/posts/structured-context-data-feminism.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, K., and J. Williams. 2021. Feminist visualization 2021: Mobilities, sovereignties, borders. Accessed February 22, 2023. https://femvizchallenge2021.weebly.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, H. C. 2021. Tactile maps for flood mitigation planning: Design and evaluation. PhD diss., Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 2009. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Combahee River Collective. 1977. The Combahee River Collective statement. In How we get free: Black feminism and the Combahee River Collective, ed. K.-Y. Taylor, 15–27. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• COVID Black. n.d. Home page. Accessed November 24, 2020. https://www.covidblack.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1):139–67. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., and L. Klein 2020. Data feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., and L. Klein. 2018. Data feminism: Collection, analysis, visualization and power. Lecture presented at University of Wisconsin–Madison. Madison, WI, February 16.
   Google Scholar
• Edney, M. H. 2019. Cartography: The ideal and its history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. 2006. Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS 10 (5):693–708. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and A. Leszczynski. 2018. Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 25 (5):1–16. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1465396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, C. S. 2018. Spatiotemporal representation. In The geographic information science & technology body of knowledge, ed. J. P. Wilson. Ithaca: University Consortium for Geographic Information Science. doi: 10.22224/gistbok/2018.4.6.
   Google Scholar
• Gallon, K. 2020a. “Care” and COVID-19: A call for Black feminist data analytics, Part II. Medium. Accessed July 4, 2022. https://medium.com/@ktgallon/care-and-covid-19-a-call-for-black-feminist-data-analytics-part-ii-77d903f0d9e2.
   Google Scholar
• Gallon, K. 2020b. A review of COVID-19 intersectional data decision-making: A call for Black feminist data analytics. Medium. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://medium.com/@ktgallon/a-review-of-covid-19-intersectional-data-decision-making-a-call-for-black-feminist-data-analytics-da8e12bc4a6b.
   Google Scholar
• Gebru, T., J. Morgenstern, B. Vecchione, J. Wortman, Vaughan, H. Wallach, H. Daumé, III, and K. Crawford. 2020. Datasheets for datasets. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. R., and M. Masucci. 2006. The implications of including women’s daily lives in a feminist GIScience. Transactions in GIS 10 (5):751–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01026.x.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J.-K., and S. Elwood. 2010. Extending the qualitative capabilities of GIS: Computer-aided qualitative GIS. Transactions in GIS 14 (1):63–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01182.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2020. Feminist mapping: Content, form, and process. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. 2021. Mapping bodies, designing feminist icons. GeoHumanities 7 (2):529–57. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2021.1883455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., and A. Bosse. 2022. Pressing pause, “doing” feminist mapping. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 21 (4):399–415. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/2083.
   Google Scholar
• Kennelly, P. 2017. Terrain representation. In The geographic information science and technology body of knowledge, ed. J. P. Wilson. Ithaca: University Consortium for Geographic Information Science. doi: 10.22224/gistbok/2017.4.9.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2007. Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography 31 (3):331–44. doi: 10.1177/0309132507077082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knigge, L., and M. Cope. 2006. Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (11):2021–37. doi: 10.1068/a37327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2002a. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4):645–61. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2002b. Introduction: Feminist geography and GIS. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9 (3):261–62. doi: 10.1080/0966369022000003860.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 2020. Data by touch. Paper presented at North American Cartographic Information Society annual conference, online, October 16.
   Google Scholar
• Maharawal, M. M., and E. McElroy. 2018. The anti-eviction mapping project: Counter mapping and oral history toward Bay Area housing justice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):380–89. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1365583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLafferty, S. L. 2002. Mapping women’s worlds: Knowledge, power and the bounds of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (3):263–69. doi: 10.1080/0966369022000003879.
   Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2006. Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Million Dollar Hoods. n.d. Million Dollar Hoods. Accessed August 20, 2020. https://milliondollarhoods.pre.ss.ucla.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Miro Boards. n.d. The online whiteboard for easy collaboration. Accessed October 23, 2022. https://miro.com/online-whiteboard/.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. 2003. Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. C. 2019. Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. 2018. Symbol library. Accessed October 23, 2022. https://www.nps.gov/maps/tools/symbol-library/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. 2020. Multivariate mapping. In The Geographic Information Science and Technology Body of Knowledge, ed. J. P. Wilson. Ithaca: University Consortium for Geographic Information Science. doi: 10.22224/gistbok/2020.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovskaya, M. E. 2002. Mapping urban change and changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9 (3):281–89. doi: 10.1080/0966369022000003897.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovskaya, M. 2006. Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A 38:2003–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, M. W. 2014. The last piece is you. The Cartographic Journal 51 (2):107–22. doi: 10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricker, B. 2018. Reflexivity, positionality and rigor in the context of big data research. In Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research, ed. J. Thatcher, A. Shears, and J. Eckert, 96–118. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodó-de-Zárate, M. 2014. Developing geographies of intersectionality with relief maps: Reflections from youth research in Manresa, Catalonia. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 21 (8):925–44. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2013.817974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N., and A. Leszczynski. 2006. Ontology-based metadata. Transactions in GIS 10 (5):709–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01024.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N., and G. Pratt. 2002. Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9 (3):291–99. doi: 10.1080/0966369022000003905.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., R. M. McMaster, F. C., Kessler, H. H. Howard, and R. B. McMaster. 2008. Thematic cartography and geographic visualization. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., A. Bosse, L. Gray, K. Helena, and M. Kelly. 2021. Feminist mapping: Past, present, and futures. Panel presented at Feminist Visualization 2021: Mobilities, Sovereignty, Borders online, February 26.
   Google Scholar