111
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Spatial Environment and Open Defecation: In Pursuit of Social Valuation of Sanitation Ecosystem Services

Pages 303-317 | Received 03 Feb 2023, Accepted 02 Oct 2023, Published online: 31 Jan 2024

Literature Cited

  • Aiemjoy, K., N. E. Stoller, S. Gebresillasie, A. Shiferaw, Z. Tadesse, T. Sewent, B. Ayele, M. Chanyalew, S. Aragie, K. Callahan, et al. 2017. Is using a latrine “a strange thing to do”? A mixed-methods study of sanitation preference and behaviors in rural Ethiopia. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96 (1):65. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0541.
  • Banerjee, A. N., N. Banik, and A. Dalmia. 2017. Demand for household sanitation in India using NFHS–3 data. Empirical Economics 53 (1):307–27. doi: 10.1007/s00181-017-1250-5.
  • Batabyal, A. A., J. R. Kahn, and R. V. O’Neill. 2003. On the scarcity value of ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 (2):334–52. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00040-2.
  • Bateman, M., and S. Engel. 2018. To shame or not to shame—That is the sanitation question. Development Policy Review 36 (2):155–73. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12317.
  • Bhatt, N., S. S. Budhathoki, D. E. I. Lucero-Prisno, G. Shrestha, M. Bhattachan, J. Thapa, A. K. Sunny, P. Upadhyaya, A. Ghimire, and P. K. Pokharel. 2019. What motivates open defecation? A qualitative study from a rural setting in Nepal. PLoS ONE 14 (7):e0219246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219246.
  • Bryan, B. A., Y. Ye, J. Zhang, and J. D. Connor. 2018. Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics. Ecosystem Services 32:144–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.07.002.
  • Caruso, B. A., T. F. Clasen, C. Hadley, K. M. Yount, R. Haardörfer, M. Rout, M. Dasmohapatra, and H. L. Cooper. 2017. Understanding and defining sanitation insecurity: Women’s gendered experiences of urination, defecation and menstruation in rural Odisha, India. BMJ Global Health 2 (4):e000414. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000414.
  • Chakraborty, S., J. Novotný, J. Das, A. Bardhan, S. Roy, S. Mondal, P. P. Patel, S. Santra, I. Maity, R. Biswas, et al. 2022. Geography matters for sanitation! Spatial heterogeneity of the district-level correlates of open defecation in India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 43 (1):62–84. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12402.
  • Chen, W., H. R. Pourghasemi, A. Kornejady, and N. Zhang. 2017. Landslide spatial modeling: Introducing new ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM machine learning techniques. Geoderma 305:314–27. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.06.020.
  • Clair, R. P., R. Rastogi, S. Lee, R. A. Clawson, E. R. Blatchley, and C. Erdmann. 2018. A qualitative study of communication, cultural identity, and open defecation. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication 19 (1):51–61. doi: 10.1080/17459435.2018.1476906.
  • Coffey, D., A. Gupta, P. Hathi, N. Khurana, D. Spears, N. Srivastav, and S. Vyas. 2014. Revealed preference for open defecation. Economic & Political Weekly 49 (38):43.
  • Dasgupta, T., and R. N. Chattopadhyay. 2008. Poverty portrayal in the context of rural Bengal: A case-study of Purulia district of West Bengal. Studies of Tribes and Tribals 6 (1):1–11. doi: 10.1080/0972639X.2008.11886569.
  • Engel, S., and A. Susilo. 2014. Shaming and sanitation in Indonesia: A return to colonial public health practices? Development and Change 45 (1):157–78. doi: 10.1111/dech.12075.
  • Exum, N. G., E. M. Gorin, G. Sadhu, A. Khanna, and K. J. Schwab. 2020. Evaluating the declarations of open defecation free status under the Swachh Bharat (a “Clean India”) Mission: Repeated cross-sectional surveys in Rajasthan, India. BMJ Global Health 5 (3):e002277. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002277.
  • Gupta, A., N. Khalid, D. Deshpande, P. Hathi, A. Kapur, N. Srivastav, S. Vyas, D. Spears, and D. Coffey. 2020. Revisiting open defecation: Evidence from a panel survey in rural North India, 2014–2018. Economic and Political Weekly 55 (21):55–63.
  • Hanchett, S. 2016. Sanitation in Bangladesh: Revolution, evolution, and new challenges. In Sustainable sanitation for all; experiences, challenges and innovations, ed. P. Bongartz, N. Vernon, and J. Fox, 31–52. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action.
  • Hathi, P., S. Haque, L. Pant, D. Coffey, and D. Spears. 2017. Place and child health: The interaction of population density and sanitation in developing countries. Demography 54 (1):337–60. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0538-y.
  • Jadhav, A., A. Weitzman, and E. Smith-Greenaway. 2016. Household sanitation facilities and women’s risk of non-partner sexual violence in India. BMC Public Health 16 (1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3797-z.
  • Jenkins, M. W., and V. Curtis. 2005. Achieving the “good life”: Why some people want latrines in rural Benin. Social Science & Medicine 61 (11):2446–59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.036.
  • Leong, C. 2020. Narratives of sanitation: Motivating toilet use in India. Geoforum 111:24–38. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.001.
  • Moyer, J. D., and S. Hedden. 2020. Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals? World Development 127:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104749.
  • Novotný, J., F. Ficek, J. K. Hill, and A. Kumar. 2018. Social determinants of environmental health: A case of sanitation in rural Jharkhand. Science of the Total Environment 643:762–74. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.239.
  • Novotný, J., J. Hasman, and M. Lepič. 2018. Contextual factors and motivations affecting rural community sanitation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 221 (2):121–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.10.018.
  • Novotný, J., H. Humňalová, and J. Kolomazníková. 2018. The social and political construction of latrines in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies 63:157–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.08.003.
  • Novotný, J., J. Kolomazníková, and H. Humňalová. 2017. The role of perceived social norms in rural sanitation: An explorative study from infrastructure-restricted settings of South Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 (7):794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070794.
  • Novotný, J., and B. G. Mamo. 2022. Household-level sanitation in Ethiopia and its influencing factors: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 22 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13822-5.
  • Odagiri, M., A. Thomas, M. Listyasari, F. Mills, R. E. S. Bain, Z. Muhammad, T. Slaymaker, A. Mardikanto, A. Gultom, A. Indiyani, et al. 2021. Safely managed on-site sanitation: A national assessment of sanitation services and potential fecal exposure in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (15):8204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158204.
  • O’Reilly, K., R. Dhanju, and A. Goel. 2017. Exploring “the remote” and “the rural”: Open defecation and latrine use in Uttarakhand, India. World Development 93:193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.022.
  • O’Reilly, K., and E. Louis. 2014. The toilet tripod: Understanding successful sanitation in rural India. Health & Place 29:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.05.007.
  • Pourghasemi, H. R., M. Mohammady, and B. Pradhan. 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.005.
  • Routray, P., W. P. Schmidt, S. Boisson, T. Clasen, and M. W. Jenkins. 2015. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: An exploratory qualitative study. BMC Public Health 15 (1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2206-3.
  • Roy, A., M. Rahaman, M. Adhikary, N. Kapasia, P. Chouhan, and K. C. Das. 2023. Unveiling the spatial divide in open defecation practices across India: An application of spatial regression and Fairlie decomposition model. BMJ Open 13 (7):e072507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072507.
  • Sahana, M., and P. P. Patel. 2019. A comparison of frequency ratio and fuzzy logic models for flood susceptibility assessment of the lower Kosi River Basin in India. Environmental Earth Sciences 78 (10):289. doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8285-1.
  • Sahoo, K. C., K. R. Hulland, B. A. Caruso, R. Swain, M. C. Freeman, P. Panigrahi, and R. Dreibelbis. 2015. Sanitation-related psychosocial stress: A grounded theory study of women across the life-course in Odisha, India. Social Science & Medicine 139:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.031.
  • Saleem, M., T. Burdett, and V. Heaslip. 2019. Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 19 (1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6423-z.
  • Sara, S., and J. Graham. 2014. Ending open defecation in rural Tanzania: Which factors facilitate latrine adoption? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11 (9):9854–70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909854.
  • Shi, Y., C. C. Feng, Q. Yu, and L. Guo. 2021. Integrating supply and demand factors for estimating ecosystem services scarcity value and its response to urbanization in typical mountainous and hilly regions of South China. Science of the Total Environment 796:149032. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149032.
  • Tamene, A., and A. Afework. 2021. Exploring barriers to the adoption and utilization of improved latrine facilities in rural Ethiopia: An integrated behavioral model for water, sanitation and hygiene (IBM–WASH) approach. PLoS ONE 16 (1):e0245289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245289.
  • Vyas, S., and D. Spears. 2018. Sanitation and religion in South Asia: What accounts for differences across countries? The Journal of Development Studies 54 (11):2119–35. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1469742.
  • Willcock, S., A. Parker, C. Wilson, T. Brewer, D. Bundhoo, S. Cooper, K. Lynch, S. Mekala, P. P. Mishra, D. Rey, et al. 2021. Nature provides valuable sanitation services. One Earth 4 (2):192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.003.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). 2019. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017: Special focus on inequalities. World Health Organization.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). 2023. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2022: Special focus on gender. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.