916
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Geographical Approach to China’s Local Government Debt

Pages 318-330 | Received 07 Dec 2022, Accepted 13 Oct 2023, Published online: 04 Mar 2024

Literature Cited

  • Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27 (2):93–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
  • Cao, G., C. Feng, and R. Tao. 2008. Local “land finance” in China’s urban expansion: Challenges and solutions. China & World Economy 16 (2):19–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-124X.2008.00104.x.
  • Dagdeviren, H., and E. Karwowski. 2022. Impasse or mutation? Austerity and (de) financialisation of local governments in Britain. Journal of Economic Geography 22 (3):685–707. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbab028.
  • Davidson, M., D. Lukens, and K. Ward. 2021. The post–great recession geographies of US municipal borrowing and indebtedness. The Professional Geographer 73 (2):240–53. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1858886.
  • de Mello, L., and J. T. Jalles. 2020. The global crisis and intergovernmental relations: Centralization versus decentralization 10 years on. Regional Studies 54 (7):942–57. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1645326.
  • Eccleston, R., and R. Krever, eds. 2017. The future of federalism: Intergovernmental financial relations in an age of austerity. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Feng, Y., F. Wu, and F. Zhang. 2022. The development of local government financial vehicles in China: A case study of Jiaxing Chengtou. Land Use Policy 112:104793. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104793.
  • Firth, M., C. Lin, and S. M. Wong. 2008. Leverage and investment under a state-owned bank lending environment: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance 14 (5):642–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.002.
  • Getis, A., and J. K. Ord. 2010. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. In Perspectives on spatial data analysis, ed. L. Anselin and S. J. Rey, 127–45. Berlin: Springer.
  • Goodchild, M. F., L. Anselin, R. P. Appelbaum, and B. H. Harthorn. 2000. Toward spatially integrated social science. International Regional Science Review 23 (2):139–59. doi: 10.1177/016001760002300201.
  • He, C., Y. Zhou, and Z. Huang. 2016. Fiscal decentralization, political centralization, and land urbanization in China. Urban Geography 37 (3):436–57. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1063242.
  • Huang, Y. 1996. Central–local relations in China during the reform era: The economic and institutional dimensions. World Development 24 (4):655–72. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00160-E.
  • Li, H., and L. A. Zhou. 2005. Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics 89 (9–10):1743–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009.
  • Li, Z., F. Wu, and F. Zhang. 2022. A multi-scalar view of urban financialization: Urban development and local government bonds in China. Regional Studies 56 (8):1282–94. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1998419.
  • Li, Z., F. Wu, and F. Zhang. 2023a. Adaptable state-controlled market actors: Underwriters and investors in the market of local government bonds in China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 55 (8):2088–2107. doi: 10.1177/0308518X231174023.
  • Li, Z., F. Wu, and F. Zhang. 2023b. The political economy of China’s local debt. The China Quarterly:1–19. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/S0305741023000814.
  • Liu, A. Y., J. C. Oi, and Y. Zhang. 2022. China’s local government debt: The grand bargain. The China Journal 87 (1):40–71. doi: 10.1086/717256.
  • Naughton, B. 2009. Understanding the Chinese stimulus package. China Leadership Monitor 28:40–71. https://www.hoover.org/research/understanding-chinese-stimulus-package.
  • Pan, F., F. Zhang, S. Zhu, and D. Wójcik. 2017. Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China. Urban Studies 54 (4):897–916.
  • Psycharis, Y., M. Zoi, and S. Iliopoulou. 2016. Decentralization and local government fiscal autonomy: Evidence from the Greek municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (2):262–80. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614153.
  • Qun, W., Y. Li, and S. Yan. 2015. The incentives of China’s urban land finance. Land Use Policy 42:432–42. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.015.
  • Shen, J. 2013. Increasing internal migration in China from 1985 to 2005: Institutional versus economic drivers. Habitat International 39:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.004.
  • Tsui, K. Y. 2011. China’s infrastructure investment boom and local debt crisis. Eurasian Geography and Economics 52 (5):686–711. doi: 10.2747/1539-7216.52.5.686.
  • Wong, C. P. 2000. Central-local relations revisited the 1994 tax-sharing reform and public expenditure management in China. China Perspectives 31:52–63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24050796.
  • Wu, F. 2022. Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China. Land Use Policy 112:104412. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104412.
  • Wu, F., F. Zhang, and Y. Liu. 2022. Beyond growth machine politics: Understanding state politics and national political mandates in China’s urban redevelopment. Antipode 54 (2):608–28. doi: 10.1111/anti.12781.
  • Ye, Z., F. Zhang, D. M. Coffman, S. Xia, Z. Wang, and Z. Zhu. 2022. China’s urban construction investment bond: Contextualising a financial tool for local government. Land Use Policy 112:105153. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105153.
  • Zhan, J. V. 2013. Strategy for fiscal survival? Analysis of local extra-budgetary finance in China. Journal of Contemporary China 22 (80):185–203. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2012.734077.
  • Zhang, L. Y. 1999. Chinese central–provincial fiscal relationships, budgetary decline and the impact of the 1994 fiscal reform: An evaluation. The China Quarterly 157:115–41. doi: 10.1017/S0305741000040224.
  • Zhou, L. A. 2016. The administrative subcontract: Significance, relevance and implications for intergovernmental relations in China. Chinese Journal of Sociology 2 (1):34–74. doi: 10.1177/2057150X15622376.