Publication Cover
Psychiatry
Interpersonal and Biological Processes
Volume 81, 2018 - Issue 2
42
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Book Reviews

Balanced Ethics Review: A Guide for Institutional ReviewBoard Members

REFERENCES

  • Caplan, A. L., & Ray, A. (2016). The ethical challenge of compassionate use. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(10), 979–980. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0416
  • Fetherstonhaugh, D., McAuliffe, L., Bauer, M., & Shanley, C. (2016). Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: How do surrogates decision-makers decide? Journal of Medical Ethics. pii: medethics-2015-103301 [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103301.6
  • Gelinas, L., Wertheimer, A., & Miller, F. G. (2016). When and why is research without consent permissible? Hastings Center Report, 46(2), 35–43. doi:10.1002/hast.548
  • Lerner, B. H., & Caplan, A. L. (2016). Judging the past: How history should inform bioethics. Annals of Internal Medicine, 164(8), 553–557. doi:10.7326/M15-2642
  • Lolekha, R., Boonsuk, S., Plipat, T., Martin, M., Tonputsa, C., Punsuwanm, N. N., … Mekton, S. (2016). Elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV – Thailand. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Report, 65(22), 562–566. doi:10.15585/mmrw6522a2
  • Martin, J. (2016). Ernest becker and stanley milgram. History of Psychology, 19(1), 3–21. doi:10.1037/hop0000016
  • McCann, S. K., Campbell, M. K., & Entwistle, V. A. (2010). Reasons for participating in randomized controlled trials: Conditional altruism and considerations for self. Trials, 11, 31. doi:10.1186/1745=6215-11-31
  • Miller, A. G. (2009). Reflections on “Replicating Milgram” (Burger, 2009). The American Psychologist, 64(1), 20–27. doi:10.1037/a0014407
  • Paul, C., & Brookes, B. (2015). The rationalization of unethical research: Revisionist accounts of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the New Zealand ‘Unfortunate Experiment’. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 105(10), e12–9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.3027201
  • Peterson, L. A., Simpson, K., Sorelle, R., Urech, T., & Chitwood, S. S. (2012). How variability in the institutional review board process affects minimal-risk multisite health services research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(10), 728–735. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205105-00011
  • Petrini, C. (2012). Kidney allocation for transplantation: Some aspects of ethical and comparative law. Transplantation Proceedings, 44(7), 1812–1814. doi:10.1016/j.tranproceed.2012.05.059
  • Phanuphak, P. (1998). Ethical issues in studies in Thailand of the vertical transmission of HIV. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338(12), 834–835. doi:10.1056/NEJM199803193381212
  • Pullman, D. (2002). Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(5), 523–545. doi:10.1076/jmep.27.5.523.10321
  • Ross, L. F., Parker, W., Veatch, R. M., Gentry, S. E., & Thistlethwaite, J. R., Jr. (2012). Equal Opportunity supplemented by fair Innings: Equity and efficiency in allocating deceased donor kidneys. American Journal of Transplantation, 12(8), 2115–2124. doi:10.111/j.1600-6143.2012.0414.x
  • Rothstein, M. A. (2016). The end of the Privacy Rule? Currents in contemporary bioethics. The Journal of Law and Medical Ethics, 44(2), 352–358. doi:10.1177/1073110516654128
  • Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., Ekhtiari, H., & Dehghani, M. (2015). The role of self-sacrifice in moral dilemmas. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127409. doi:10.137/journl.pone.0.12409
  • Sarnoff, J. D. (2015). The patent law Duchy of Grand Fenwick; a comment on The mouse that trolled: The long and tortuous history of a gene mutation patent that became an expensive impediment to Alzheimer’s research. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 723–728. doi:10.1093/jlb?lsv048r
  • Savulescu, J. (2015). Science wars – How much risk should soldiers be exposed to in military experimentation? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(1), 99–104. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsv006
  • Silberman, G., & Kahn, K. L. (2011). Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. The Milbank Quarterly, 89(4), 599–627. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00644.x
  • Wan, Y. L., Beverly-Stevenson, R. B., Carlisle, D., Clarke, S., Edmondson, R. J., Glover, S., … Crosbie, E. J. (2016). Working together to shape the endometrial cancer research agenda: The top ten unanswered research questions. Gynecologic Oncology, 143, 287–293. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.333
  • Wertheimer, A. (2015a). The social value requirement reconsidered. Bioethics, 29(5), 301–308. doi:10.1111/bioe.1218
  • Wertheimer, A. (2015b). The ethics of promulgating principles of research ethics; the problem of diversion effects. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(1), 2–32. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsu039
  • Wilkinson, T. M., & Dittmer, I. D. (2016). Should children be given priority in kidney allocation? Journal of Bioethics Inquiry. [Epub ahead of print] PMID 27392661. doi:10.007/s11673-016-9737-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.