Kinesiology Faculty Citations Across Academic Rank

References

• Baird, L. M., & Oppenheim, C. (1994). Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20, 2–15. doi:10.1177/016555159402000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68, 179–189. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98, 487–509. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumback, R. A. (2012). “3 … 2 … 1 … impact [factor]: Target [academic career] destroyed!”: Just another statistical casualty. Journal of Child Neurology, 27, 1565–1576. doi:10.1177/0883073812465014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, B. D. (2005). Trends in the usage of the ISI bibliometric data: Uses, abuses, and implications. Libraries and the Academy, 5, 105–125. doi:10.1353/pla.2005.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 558–569. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. C. F., Zadpoor, A. A., & Dodou, D. (2014). The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A longitudinal study. Scientometrics, 98, 1547–1565. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Loped-Cozar, E., & Cabezas-Clavjo, A. (2013). Ranking journals: Could Google Scholar metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and Scimago journal rank? Learned Publishing, 26, 101–114. doi:10.1087/20130206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editorial: Not-so-deep impact. (2005). Nature, 435, 1003–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzie, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22, 338–342. doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, L. M., & Rauh, A. E. (2014). Using Google Scholar Citations to profile scholars’ work. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 78. doi:10.5062/F4319SWZ
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, J. S. (1975). Uncitedness of articles in Nature, a multi-disciplinary scientific journal. Information Processing & Management, 11, 165–169. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(75)90005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacso, P. (2005). Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29, 208–214. doi:10.1108/14684520510598066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2012). Twenty-year trends of authorship and sampling in applied biomechanics research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114, 16–20. doi:10.2466/11.PMS.114.1.16-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2014). Citation rates for highly-cited papers from different sub-disciplinary areas within kinesiology. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 25(2), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015a). Citation rate of highly-cited papers in 100 kinesiology-related journals. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19, 44–50. doi:10.1080/1091367X.2014.988336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson, D. (2015b). Evidence of citation bias in kinesiology-related journals. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 26(1), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kosmulski, M. (2012). The role of references in scientific papers: Cited papers as objects of research. Research Evaluation, 21, 87–88. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvr004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagne, E. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practice: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 997–1004. doi:10.1002/asi.20349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opthof, T., Coronel, R., & Piper, H. M. (2004). Impact factors: No totum pro parte by skewness of citation. Cardiovascular Research, 61, 201–203. doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google Scholar Citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2370–2377. doi:10.1002/asi.22761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 145, 510–515.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, M. (2007). Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95, 442–445. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 497–497. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 193–196. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. (2015, May 1). Retrieved from http://am.ascb.org/dora/
   Google Scholar
• Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2004). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Population and Development Review, 30, 489–506. doi:10.1111/padr.2004.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. H. (2009). Google Scholar search performance: Comparative recall and precision. Libraries and the Academy, 9, 5–24. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, W. B., Wallace, A. E., & Kimberly, B. C. S. (2004). Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1949–1954. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2015). List of academic ranks. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_ranks
   Google Scholar