References
- Barnett, R. (2004). The purposes of higher education and the changing face of academia. London Review of Education, 2, 61–73. doi:10.1080/1474846042000177483
- Burt, J. (1998). The role of kinesiology in elevating modern society. Quest, 50, 80–95. doi:10.1080/00336297.1998.10484265
- Charles, J. (1979). Technocentric ideology in physical education. Quest, 31, 277–284. doi:10.1080/00336297.1979.10519944
- Charles, J. (1994). Contemporary kinesiology. Chicago, IL: Morton.
- Charles, J. (2001). Zen in the art of kinesiology. Quest, 53, 151–164. doi:10.1080/00336297.2001.10491735
- Hawkins, A. (2011). Kinesiology for humans. Quest, 63, 249–264. doi:10.1080/00336297.2011.10483679
- Hochstetler, D. (2012). Wilderness and kinesiology. Quest, 64(1), 47–60. doi:10.1080/00336297.2012.653262
- Kretchmar, S. (1998). Building strong academic programs: The problem of performance. Quest, 50, 185–190. doi:10.1080/00336297.1998.10484277
- Lu, C., Tito, J., & Kentel, J. (2009). Eastern movement disciplines (EMDs) and mindfulness: A new path to subjective knowledge in Western physical education. Quest, 61, 353–370. doi:10.1080/00336297.2009.10483621
- Machiavelli, N. (1988). The Prince. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Overdorf, V. (2005). Images and influences in the promotion of physical activity. Quest, 57, 243–254. doi:10.1080/00336297.2005.10491855
- Thomas, J. (2014). The public face of kinesiology in the 21st century. Quest, 66, 313–321. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918894