776
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Expert Perspectives on the Future of Physical Education in Higher Education

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Acker, S., Webber, M., & Smyth, E. (2012). Tenure troubles and equity matters in Canadian academe. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33, 743–761. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.674784
  • Alfrey, L., Enright, E., & Rynne, S. (2017). Letters from early career academics: The physical education and sport pedagogy field of play. Sport, Education and Society, 22(1), 5–21. doi:10.1080/13573322.2016.1242479
  • Blackmore, J. (2010). Research assessment: A calculative technology governing quality, acountability, and equity. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 67–84). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  • Block, B. A., & Estes, S. (2011). Supercomplexity in higher education kinesiology. Quest, 63, 179–196. doi:10.1080/00336297.2011.10483675
  • Brown, W. (2011). Neoliberalized knowledge. History of the Present, 1(1), 113–129. doi:10.5406/historypresent.1.1.0113
  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bryceson, D., Manicom, L., & Kassam, Y. (2005). The methodology of the participatory research approach. In R. Tandon (Ed.), Participatory research: Revisiting the roots (pp. 179–193). New Delhi, India: Mosaic.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London, England: Routledge.
  • Corbin, C. B. (1993). The field of physical education: Common goals, not common roles. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 64(1), 79–87. doi:10.1080/07303084.1993.10606681
  • Custonja, Z., Milanovic, D., & Sporis, G. (2009). Kinesiology in the names of higher education institutions in Europe and the United States of America. Kinesiology, 41(2), 136–146.
  • Douglas, D. D., & Halas, J. M. (2013). The wages of whiteness: Confronting the nature of ivory tower racism and the implications for physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18, 453–474. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.602395
  • Dunn, J. M. (2009). The times are a changing: Implications for kinesiology. Quest, 61, 269–277. doi:10.1080/00336297.2009.10483615
  • Elliott, D. (2007). Forty years of kinesiology: A Canadian perspective. Quest, 59, 154–162. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483544
  • Enright, E., Hill, J., Sandford, R., & Gard, M. (2014). Looking beyond what’s broken: Towards an appreciative research agenda for physical education and sport pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 912–926. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.854764
  • Enright, E., Rynne, S. B., & Alfrey, L. (2017). ‘Letters to an early career academic’: Learning from the advice of the physical education and sport pedagogy professoriate. Sport, Education and Society, 22(1), 22–39. doi:10.1080/13573322.2016.1257483
  • Fiorentino, L. H. (2012). Positive perspectives on the profession: Reframing through appreciative inquiry. Quest, 64, 209–228. doi:10.1080/00336297.2012.723464
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–79 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan (Original work published 1978–1979).
  • Gill, D. (2007). Integration: The key to sustaining kinesiology in higher education. Quest, 59, 270–286. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483552
  • Golde, C. M. (2006). Preparing stewards of the discipline. In C. M. Golde, & G. E. Walker (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline—Carnegie essays on the doctorate (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline-Carnegie essays on the doctorate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gordon, T. J. (1992). The methods of futures research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 522, 25–35. doi:10.1177/0002716292522001003
  • Gordon, T. J. (2009). The Delphi method. In J. C. Glenn, & T. J. Gordon (Eds.), Futures research methodology (pp. 1–29). Washington, DC: Millenium.
  • Greendorfer, S. L. (1987). Specialization, fragmentation, integration, discipline, profession: What is the real issue? Quest, 39, 56–64. doi:10.1080/00336297.1987.10483856
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd Edition (pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gustafson, D. H., Shukla, R. K., Delbecq, A., & Walster, G. W. (1973). A comparison study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups and nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 280–291. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(73)90052-4
  • Hall, B. (2005). Breaking the monopoly of knowledge: Research methods, participation and development. In R. Tandon (Ed.), Participatory research: Revisiting the roots (pp. 9–21). New Delphi, India: Mosaic.
  • Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
  • Ishee, J. H. (2003). The future of physical education in higher education: A Delphi study. The Chronicle of Physical Education in Higher Education, 14(1), 4–5.
  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–604). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2014). The Delphi technique: An untapped approach of participatory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 143–160. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.936737
  • Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. London, England: Routledge.
  • Kirk, D. (2014). Making a career in PESP in the corporatized university: Reflections on hegemony, resistance, collegiality and scholarship. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 320–332. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.879780
  • Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (2001). The social construction of PETE/PESP in higher education: Toward a research agenda. Quest, 53, 440–456. doi:10.1080/00336297.2001.10491757
  • Kretchmar, S. (2013). Tensions, integrations, messiness, and hope for the future. Kinesiology Review, 2, 103–106. doi:10.1123/krj.2.1.103
  • Kretchmar, S. (2014). Complementary kinesiology: Why it is not wise to choose sides or work alone. Quest, 66, 249–262. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918893
  • Laker, A. (2003). The future of physical education: Building a new pedagogy. London, England: Routledge.
  • Lawson, H. A. (1998). Here today, gone tomorrow? A framework for analyzing the development, transformation, and disappearance of helping fields. Quest, 50, 225–237. doi:10.1080/00336297.1998.10484282
  • Lawson, H. A. (2007). Renewing the core curriculum. Quest, 59, 219–243. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483550
  • Lawson, H. A. (2014). Investing in leaders and leadership to secure a desirable future. Quest, 66, 263–287. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918892
  • Lawson, H. A., & Morford, W. R. (1979). The crossdisciplinary structure of kinesiology and sports studies: Distinctions, implications and advantages. Quest, 31, 222–230. doi:10.1080/00336297.1979.10519939
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Lorusso, J. R., Francis, N., & Lathrop, A. (2015, April). Update on the ‘name game’: Investigating the names of Canadian academic units of physical education/kinesiology. Presentation at the American Educational Researchers’ Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
  • Massengale, J. D. (1988). The unprepared discipline: Selection of alternative futures. Quest, 40, 107–114. doi:10.1080/00336297.1988.10483892
  • Melnychuk, N., Robinson, D. B., Lu, C., Chorney, D., & Randall, L. (2011). Physical education teacher education (PETE/PESP) in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 34, 148–168.
  • Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., Holmes, E., & Agiomavritis, S. (2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe, 97(1), 22.
  • Newell, K. M. (2007). Kinesiology: Challenges of multiple agendas. Quest, 59, 5–24. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483532
  • O’Sullivan, M., & Penney, D. (2014). Education: A space to survive and thrive? Sport, Education and Society, 19, 343–351. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.802686
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Penney, D., & Chandler, T. (2000). Physical education: What future(s)? Sport, Education and Society, 5(1), 71–87. doi:10.1080/135733200114442
  • Ransdell, L. B. (2014). Women as leaders in kinesiology and beyond: Smashing through the glass obstacles. Quest, 66, 150–168. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.895953
  • Razor, J. E., & Brassie, P. S. (1990). Trends in the changing titles of physical education departments in the United States. In American Academy of Physical Education (Ed.), The academy papers (Vol. 23). Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  • Rikli, R. E. (2006). Kinesiology—A “homeless” field: Addressing organization and leadership needs. Quest, 58, 288–309. doi:10.1080/00336297.2006.10491884
  • Rink, J. (2007). What knowledge is of most worth? Perspectives on kinesiology from pedagogy. Quest, 59, 100–110. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483540
  • Schlety, P., & Noblit, G. (1982). Some uses of sociological theory in educational evaluation. In R. Corwin (Ed.), Policy research. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Siedentop, D. (2002). Content knowledge for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 368–377. doi:10.1123/jtpe.21.4.368
  • Siedentop, D. (2009). Introduction to physical education, fitness and sport (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1–21.
  • Tandon, R. (2002). Participatory research: Revisiting the roots. New Delhi, India: Mosaic.
  • Templin, T. J., Blankenship, B. T., & Richards, K. A. R. (2014). End of a golden era: The demise of a PETE/PESP program. Pelinks4u, 16(8). Retrieved from http://www.pelinks4u.org/articles/templin10_2014.htm
  • Thomas, J. R. (2014). The public face of kinesiology in the 21st century. Quest, 66, 313–321. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918894
  • Tierney, W. (2001). The autonomy of knowledge and the decline of the subject: Postmodernism and the reformulation of the university. Higher Education, 41, 353–372. doi:10.1023/A:1017588907541
  • Tinning, R. (2015). ‘I don’t read fiction’: Academic discourse and the relationship between health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 20, 710–721. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.798638
  • Wade, M. G. (2007). Quo vadis kinesiology. Quest, 59, 170–173. doi:10.1080/00336297.2007.10483546
  • Zipin, L. (2010). Situating university governance in the ethico-emotive ground tone of post/late times. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 147–162). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.