837
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Social Theory and Movement Skill Learning in Kinesiology

What it Means to be a Learner and What it Means to Learn and Know in Movement Skill Learning

References

  • Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 39(5), 353–367.
  • Aggerholm, K., & Larsen, S. (2017). Parkour as acrobatics: An existential phenomenological study of movement in parkour. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2016.1196387
  • Aggerholm, K., Standal, O., Barker, D., & Larsson, H. (2018). On practising in physical education: Outline for a pedagogical model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1372408
  • Allen-Collinson, J. (2016). Breathing in life: Phenomenological perspectives on sport and exercise. In B. Smith & B. Smith (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 11–23). Routledge.
  • Allen-Collinson, J., & Evans, A. (2019). To be or not to be phenomenology: That is the question. European Journal for Sport and Society, 16(4), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2019.1693148
  • Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696153
  • Barhama, A. (2019). It is time to move from motor behaviour and sport psychology labs to naturalistic environments. International Journal of Motor Control and Learning, 2(2), 27–30.
  • Barker, D., Nyberg, G., & Larsson, H. (2020). Exploring movement learning in physical education using a threshold approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0130
  • Barker, D., Nyberg, G., & Larsson, H. (2021). Coaching for skill development in sport: A kinesio-cultural approach. Sports Coaching Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1952811
  • Bergentoft, H. (2020). Running: A way to increase body awareness in secondary school physical education. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18814035
  • Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
  • Björkholm, E. (2015). Teknik i de tidiga skolåren—om vad det innebär att kunna konstruera en länkmekanism [Technology in the early school years—What it means to be able to construct a linking mechanism]. NorDina, 11(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.829
  • Block, B., Haneishi, K., Zarco, E., & Megías, E. (2021). Thirdspace movement concepts in physical education teacher education. Quest, 73(4), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2021.1957691
  • Booth, S., & Anderberg, E. (2005). Academic development for knowledge capabilities: Learning, reflecting and developing. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284813
  • Brown, T., Bennet, D., Ward, R., & Payne, P. (2008). The context of movement and its social ecology. Aare Bro09083.
  • Brown, T., & Payne, P. (2009). Conceptualizing the phenomenology of movement in physical education: Implications for pedagogical inquiry and development. Quest, 61(4), 418–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2009.10483624
  • Carlgren, I. (2020). The knowledge machinery and claims in learning study as paedeutical research. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2019-0010
  • Carlgren, I., Ahlstrand, P., Björkholm, E., & Nyberg, G. (2015). The meaning of knowing what is to be known. Education & Didactique, 9(3), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.2204
  • Carlgren, I., & Nyberg, G. (2015). Från ord till rörelser och dans – en analys av rörelsekunnandet i en dansuppgift [From words to movements to dance—An analysis of knowing in dance]. Forskning Om Undervisning Och Lärande [Research on Teaching and Learning], (14), 24–40.
  • Chow, J. Y. (2013). Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: Evidence, challenges, and implications. Quest, 65(4), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.807746
  • Clegg, J., & Butryn, T. (2012). An existential phenomenological examination of parkour and freerunning. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 4(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2012.693527
  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1989). Knowing and the known. The later works 1949–1952 (Vol. 16). Southern Illinois University Press (Original work published 1949).
  • Engström, L. M. (2008). Who is physically active? Cultural capital and sports participation from adolescence to middle age—A 38-year follow-up study. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 13(4), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980802400510
  • Evans, J. (2004). Making a difference? Education and ‘ability’ in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 10(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X04042158
  • Evans, J., & Penney, D. (2008). Levels on the playing field: The social construction of physical ‘ability’ in the physical education curriculum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701345576
  • Farnell, B. (2001). Human action sign in cultural context. Scarecrow Press.
  • Iserbyt, P., Madou, B., Elen, J., & Behets, D. (2010). Task card instruction: The effect of different cue sequences on students’ learning in tennis. European Physical Education Review, 16(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X10382972
  • Jarret, K., & Light, R. (2019). The experience of teaching using a game based approach: Teachers as learners, collaborators and catalysts. European Physical Education Review, 25(2), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X17753023
  • Jones, R., Harvey, S., & Kirk, D. (2016). Everything is at stake; yet nothing is at stake: Exploring meaning-making in game-centred approaches. Sport, Education and Society, 21(6), 888–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.965138
  • Kretchmar, R. S. (2000). Moving and being moved: Implications for practice. Quest, 52(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2000.10491714
  • Laguna, P. L. (2008). Task complexity and sources of task-related information during the observational learning process. Journal of Sport Science, 26(10), 1097–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410801956569
  • Larsson, H. (2021). Learning movements: New perspectives of movement education. Routledge.
  • Larsson, H., & Karlefors, I. (2015). Physical education cultures in Sweden: Fitness, sports, dancing … learning? Sport Education and Society, 20(5), 573–587. http://dx.doi.org.www.bibproxy.du.se/10.1080/13573322.2014.979143
  • Larsson, H., & Nyberg, G. (2016). It doesn’t matter how they move really, as long as they move.” Physical education teachers on developing their students’ movement capabilities. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1157573
  • Larsson, H., & Quennerstedt, M. (2012). Understanding movement: A sociocultural approach to exploring moving humans. Quest, 64(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.706884
  • Light, R. (2008). Complex learning theory—Its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: Implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.27.1.21
  • Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. University of Gothenburg. http://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/29645
  • Magill, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill.
  • Martínkova, I., & Parry, J. (2011). An introduction to the phenomenological study of sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 5(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2011.602571
  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography ? Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
  • Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husen & T. Husen (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 8, 2nd ed., pp. 4424–4429). Pergamon.
  • Marton, F. (1995). Cognosco ergo sum. Reflections on reflections. Nordisk Pedagogik [Nordic Pedagogy], 15(3), 165–175.
  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
  • Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating teaching to classroom learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.74.3.e08k1276713824u5
  • Nyberg, G. (2015). Developing a ‘Somatic Velocimeter’—The practical knowledge of freeskiers. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2013.857709
  • Nyberg, G. (2018). Att urskilja och erfara sitt sätt att springa - kan elever lära sig det i idrott och hälsa? [Experiencing one’s own way of running—Can students learn this in physical education?]. Forskning Om Undervisning Och Lärande, 6(1), 43–63.
  • Nyberg, G., Barker, D., & Larsson, H. (2020). Exploring the educational landscape of juggling: Challenging notions of ability in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1712349
  • Nyberg, G., Barker, D., & Larsson, H. (2021). Learning in the educational landscapes of juggling, unicycling, and dancing. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1886265
  • Nyberg, G., & Carlgren, I. (2015). Exploring capability to move—Somatic grasping of house-hopping. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(6), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2014.882893
  • Nyberg, G., & Larsson, H. (2014). Exploring ‘what’ to learn in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.726982
  • Nyberg, G., & Larsson, H. (2017). Physical education teachers’ content knowledge of movement capability. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0180
  • Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308612
  • Peters, M. A. (2009). Heidegger, phenomenology, education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00516.x
  • Polanyi, M. (1969). The logic of tacit inference. In M. Green (Ed.), Knowing and being. Essays by Michael Polanyi (pp. 138–158). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Redelius, K., Quennerstedt, M., & Öhman, M. (2015). Communicating aims and learning goals in physical education: Part of a subject for learning? Sport Education and Society, 20(5), 641–655. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/13573322.2014.987745
  • Renshaw, I., Arau´job, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y. D., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: A clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870
  • Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect of teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000332506
  • Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind. Routledge. ( Original work published 1949).
  • Sin, S. (2010). Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900401
  • Standal, Ø. (2021). A phenomenological perspective of movement learning. In H. Larsson (Ed.), Learning movements: New perspectives of movement education (pp. 61–74). Routledge.
  • Standal, Ø., & Bratten, J. (2021). ‘Feeling better’: Embodied self-knowledge as an aspect of movement capability. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1886268
  • Standahl, Ø., & Engelsrud, G. (2013). Researching embodiment in movement contexts: A phenomenological approach. Sport, Education and Society, 18(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.608944
  • Stolz, S. (2013). Phenomenology and physical education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(9), 949–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785355
  • Sundler, M., Dudas, C., & Anderhag, P. (2017). Från missförstånd till klarhet: Hur kan undervisningen organiseras för att stötta elevers förståelse för växthuseffekten? [From misunderstanding to clarity: How can teaching be designed to help students understand the green house effect?]. Forskning om undervisning och lärande [Research on Teaching and Learning], 2(5), 6–29.
  • Thorburn, M. (2008). Articulating a Merleau-Pontian phenomenology of physical education: The quest for active student engagement and authentic assessment in high-stakes examination awards. European Physical Education Review, 14(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X08090709
  • Thorburn, M., & Stolz, S. (2020). Understanding experience better in educational contexts: The phenomenology of embodied subjectivity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1632798
  • Tinning, R. (2010). Pedagogy and human movement. Theory, practice, research. Routledge.
  • Zelaznik, H. (2014). The past and future of motor learning and control: What is the proper level of description and analysis? Kinesiology Review, 3(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2014-0035