1,138
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Evaluation Concepts and Methods

Principles and purposes of European Union Cohesion policy evaluation

Pages 179-188 | Received 01 Apr 2005, Published online: 23 Jan 2007

References

  • Argyris , C. and Schön , D. A. 1978 . Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective , Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley .
  • Argyris , C. and Schön , D. A. 1996 . Organizational Learning II , Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley .
  • Bachtler , J. and Turok , I. 1997 . The Coherence of EU Regional Policy: Contrasting Perspectives on the Structural Funds , Edited by: Bachtler , J. and Turok , I. London : Jessica Kingsley . Regional Policy and Development Series No. 17
  • Batterbury , S. C.E. 2002 . Evaluating policy implementation: the European Union's small and medium-sized enterprise policies in Galicia and Sardinia . Regional Studies , 36 : 861 – 876 .
  • Bernstein , D. J. 1999 . Comments on Perrin's ‘Effective use and misuse of performance measurement’ . American Journal of Evaluation , 20 : 85 – 93 .
  • Council of The European Union . 1999 . Council Regulation Laying Down General Provisions on the Structural Funds . (EC) No. 1260/1999, 21 June 1999
  • Council of The European Union . 2005 . “ Proposal for a Council Regulation Laying Down General Provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund ” . Brussels : Council of the European Union . Presidency Compromise to the Structural Actions Working Party, Council of the European Union, 21 December 2005, CADREFIN 269
  • EPRC and Fraser Associates . 2002 . “ A Feasibility Study of an Evaluation of the Impact and Added Value of the EU Structural Funds in the UK, Final Report to the Department of Trade over Industry ” . Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde and Fraser Associates .
  • European Commission . 1999 . “ The Means Collection: Evaluating Socio-economic Programmes, 1–6 ” . Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
  • European Commission . 2000 . “ Communication to the Commission ‘Focus on results: strengthening evaluation of Commission activities ” . Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . EC (2000)1051 (mimeo)
  • European Commission . 2001 . Communication on Activity Based Management , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . SEC 2001 1197/6&7
  • European Commission . December 2002 . Communication for the Commission from the President and Mrs Schreyer: Evaluation Standards and Good Practice , December , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . C 527-23
  • European Commission . 2002b . Financial Regulation , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . SEC (2002) 1605
  • European Commission . 2002c . The Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . SEC (2002) 2342
  • European Commission . 2003 . “ The New Programming Period 2000–2006: Methodological Working Documents ” . Brussels : Commission of the European Communities . Working Paper No. 4, Implementation of the Performance Reserve. (available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/esf2000/working_documents/performance_reserve/en.pdf)
  • European Commission . 2004a . “ Report by DG REGIO to the Committee on the Development and Conversion of the Regions ” . In A Report on the Performance Reserve and Mid-term Evaluation , Brussels : DG REGIO, Commission of the European Communities .
  • European Commission . 2004b . “ Report by DG Regional Policy Drawn up in Consultation with the Evaluation Network, November ” . In The Mid-term Evaluation in Objective 1 and 2 Regions: Growing Evaluation Capacity , Brussels : DG REGIO Commission of the European Communities .
  • European Commission . 2004c . “ Office for Official Publications of the European Communities ” . In Evaluating EU Activities: A Practical Guide for the Commission Service Luxembourg (available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/budget/evaluation/pdf/pub_eval_activities_full_en.PDF) (accessed on 6 April 2005)
  • Fetterman , D. , Kaftarian , S. and Wandersman , A. 1986 . Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self- Assessment & Accountability , Edited by: Fetterman , D. , Kaftarian , S. and Wandersman , A. London : Sage .
  • Franklin , G. 2003 . “ An analysis of the value of performance indicators for evaluating the success of incident management units (IMUs) in South Wales Police ” . University of Glamorgan . Unpublished MSc thesis
  • Guba , E. G. and Lincoln , Y. S. 1989 . Fourth Generation Evaluation , London : Sage .
  • House , E. R. and Howe , K. R. 2000 . Deliberative democratic evaluation . New Directions for Evaluation , 85 : 3 – 12 .
  • Johnson , S. , Fidler , Y. , Bickerstaffe , T. and Batterbury , S. C.E. 2005 . Update to the Mid Term Evaluation of the Community Support Framework for England/Gibraltar, Scotland and Wales , Internal Report for Department of Work and Pensions (DWP .
  • Kelleher , J. , Batterbury , S. C.E. and Stern , E. 1999 . The Thematic Evaluation of the Partnership Principle of the European Structural Funds , DG REGIO, Brussels (available at: http://www.inforegio.cec.eu.int/wbdoc/docgener/evaluation/rathe_en.htm . Report Prepared for the European Commission, DG XVI, Regional Policy and Cohesion, February
  • Lave , J. and Wenger , E. 1991 . Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Lincoln , Y. 2001 . “ Engaging sympathies: relationships between action research and social constructivism ” . In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice , Edited by: Reason , P. and Bradbury , H. 124 – 132 . London : Sage .
  • Mairate , A. 2001 . “ La valutazione delle politiche regionale in Europa: verso una fase di maturità ” . In Crescita regionale ed urbana nel mercato globale: Modelli, politiche, processi di valutazione , Edited by: Mazzola , F. and Maggioni , M. A . 357 – 370 . Milan : Franco Angeli .
  • Mairate , A. 2002 . “ L'esperienza europa nella costruzione di capacità valutative nell'ambito dei fondi strutturali ” . In Valutazione 2002: Pratiche di valutazione in Italia: consolidamenti repensamenti e nuovi ambiti di reflessione , Edited by: Vecchi , L. L.G. 17 – 36 . Milan : Franco Angeli .
  • Nonaka , I. and Takeuchi , H. 1995 . The Knowledge-creating Company , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Owen , J. 2004 . “ Evaluation forms: toward an inclusive framework for evaluation practice ” . In Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences , Edited by: Alkin , M. C. 356 – 371 . London : Sage .
  • Pawson , R. 2002a . Evidence-based policy: in search of a method . Evaluation , 8 : 157 – 181 .
  • Pawson , R. 2002b . Evidence-based policy: the promise of 'realist synthesis . Evaluation , 8 : 340 – 358 .
  • Pawson , R. and Tilley , N. 1997 . Realistic Evaluation , London : Sage .
  • Perrin , B. 1999 . Performance measurement: does the reality match the rhetoric? A rejoinder to Bernstein and Winston . American Journal of Evaluation , 20 : 101 – 111 .
  • Polverari , L. and Bachtler , J. 2004 . Assessing the Evidence: The Evaluation of Regional Policy in Europe , Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde . Paper No. 04/5 to the European Regional Policy Research Consortium (EoRPA), September
  • Preskill , H. and Torres , R. T. 1999 . Building capacity for organizational learning through evaluative inquiry . Evaluation , 5 : 42 – 60 .
  • Price Waterhouse . November 1995 . “ Unpublished Ex-post Evaluation Synthesis Report Prepared for the European Commission ” . In Evaluation of the Community Support Frameworks for the Objective 1 Regions in the Period 1989–1993 , November , London : Price Waterhouse . Mimeo
  • Rist , R. and Stame , N. 2005 . From Studies to Streams: Managing Evaluative Systems , Somerset, NJ : Transactions .
  • Stame , N. 2001a . “ L'istituzionalizzazione della valutazione: le ondate di diffusione della valutazione nei paesi industrializzati ” . In Sviluppare le capacità di valutazione dei funzionari pubblici nella gestione dei fondi strutturali , Edited by: Stame , N. , Silvani , A. and Scarpitti , L. 57 – 68 . Milan : Franco Angeli .
  • Stame , N. 2001b . “ Il dibattito sulla qualità delle valutazioni nel contesto dei Fondi Strutturali Europei ” . In Sviluppare le capacità di valutazione dei funzionari pubblici nella gestione dei fondi strutturali , Edited by: Stame , N. , Silvani , A. and Scarpitti , L. 99 – 105 . Milan : Franco Angeli .
  • Taylor , S. , Bachtler , J. and Polverari , L. 2001 . Structural Funds evaluation as a programme management tool: comparative assessment and reflections on Germany . Informationen zur Raumentwicklung , 6/7 : 341 – 357 . Heft
  • Van Thiel , S. and Leeuw , F. L. 2002 . The performance paradox in the public sector . Public Performance and Management Review , 25 : 267 – 281 .
  • Weiss , C. H. 1997 . Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? . American Journal of Evaluation , 19 : 21 – 33 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.