Science, Institutions, and Markets: Developments in the Indian Biotechnology Sector

References

• All India Biotech Association (AIBA) . 2000 . Biotechnology Parks in the Context of Indian Biotechnology Industry , New Delhi : AIBA .
   Google Scholar
• Anselin , L. , Varga , A. and Acs , Z. 1997 . Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations . Journal of Urban Economics , 42 : 422 – 448 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi , D. and Pianta , M. 1992 . The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries , Boston, MA : Kluwer .
   Google Scholar
• Arora , P. 2005 . Healthcare biotechnology firms in India: evolution, structure and growth . Current Science , 89 : 458 – 463 .
   Google Scholar
• Bagchi-Sen , S. 2004 . Firm-specific characteristics of R&D collaborators and non-collaborators in U.S. biotechnology clusters and elsewhere . International Journal of Technology and Globalization , 1 : 92 – 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Bagchi-Sen , S. , Lawton Smith , H. and Hall , L. 2004 . The U.S. biotechnology industry: industry dynamics and policy . Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy , 22 : 199 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanyam , V. N. and Balasubramanyam , A. 2000 . “ The software cluster in Bangalore ” . In Regions, Globalisation and the Knowledge-based Economy , Edited by: Dunning , J. H. 349 – 363 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bharat Biotech available at: http://www.bharatbiotech.com
   Google Scholar
• Biocon available at: http://www.biocon.com
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi , S. 2002a . “ Measuring Developments in Biotechnology: International Initiatives, Status in India and Agenda before Developing Countries ” . New Delhi : RIS . Research and Information System (RIS) for the Non-aligned and Other Developing Countries Discussion Paper No. 30
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi , S. 2002b . “ Status and Development of Biotechnology in India: An Analytical Overview ” . New Delhi : RIS . Research and Information System (RIS) for the Non-aligned and Other Developing Countries Discussion Paper No. 28
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi , S. 2004 . “ Biotechnology in South Asia: Issues, Concerns and Opportunities ” . New Delhi : RIS . Research and Information System (RIS) for the Non-aligned and Other Developing Countries Discussion Paper No. 68
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi , S. 2005 . “ Dynamics of Biotechnology Research and Industry in India: Statistics, Perspectives, and Key Policy Issues ” . Paris : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD . STI Working Paper No. 2005/6, Directorate of Science, Technology and Industry
   Google Scholar
• Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and Rabo India . 2003 . “ The Business of Biotechnology. A Structural and Financial Perspective ” . New Delhi : CII . A CII–Rabo India Joint Report on Financing Biotech Enterprises
   Google Scholar
• Cooke , P. 2002 . Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems . International Regional Science Review , 25 : 8 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke , P. 2004 . The molecular biology revolution and the rise of bioscience megacentres in North America and Europe . Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy , 22 : 161 – 177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar , B. and Chaturvedi , S. 1998 . India's biotechnology plans for the next five years . Biotechnology and Development Monitor , 35 : 16 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Doutriaux , J. 2003 . University–industry linkages and the development of knowledge clusters in Canada . Local Economy , 18 : 63 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Dr. Reddy's Laboratories available at: http://www.drreddys.com
   Google Scholar
• Dunning , J. H. 2002 . “ Introduction ” . In Regions, Globalisation and the Knowledge-based Economy , Edited by: Dunning , J. H. 1 – 3 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ernst , D. 2002 . Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems: implications for developing countries . Economics of Innovation and New Technology , 11 : 497 – 523 .
   Google Scholar
• Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerceand Industry (FICCI) . n.d. . (available at: http://www.ficci.com/ficci/studies/biotech_sector_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , M. P. and Florida , R. 1994 . The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States . Annals of the Association of American Geographers , 84 : 210 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall , L. and Bagchi-Sen , S. 2001 . An analysis of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the U.S. biotechnology industry . International Journal of Biotechnology , 3 : 267 – 286 .
   Google Scholar
• India and the WTO . 2002 . Patents (amendment) act 2002 notified . India and the WTO, A Newsletter of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry , 4 : 1 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe , A. , Tratjenberg , M. and Henderson , R. 1993 . Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 108 : 577 – 598 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman , K. S. 2001 . Indian regulatory system stifles industry growth . Business and Regulatory News , 19 : 105 – 106 .
   Google Scholar
• Karmali , N. 2004 . Copycats no more; India makes great knockoff drugs. Now one company is originating its own . Forbes , 173 : 66 – 67 . 19 April
   Google Scholar
• Karnataka Government . 2003 . available at: http://www.bangalorebio.com/docs/BiotechPolicyf.doc) (accessed October 2005
   Google Scholar
• Kenney , M. 1986 . Biotechnology: The University–Industrial Complex , New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni , N. 2004 . Angling for take off . BioSpectrum. The Business of Biotech , 11 May (available at: http://www.biospectrumindia.com/content/topStory/104051101.asp) (accessed October 2005
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie , B. F. and Sheldon , I. M. 2000 . The comparative advantage of real options: an explanation for the US specialization in biotechnology . AgBioForum , 3 : 47 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Maria , A. , Ruet , J. and Zerah , M.-H. 2003 . Biotechnology in India , New Delhi : French Embassy .
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey , M. 2004 . Evolutionary economics perspectives in the regional–national–international dimensions of biotechnology innovations . Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy , 22 : 179 – 198 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe , S. 1995 . Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework . Cambridge Journal of Economics , 19 : 25 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani , S. V. 2003 . Who is interested in biotech? R&D strategies, knowledge base and market sales of Indian biopharmaceutical firms . Research Policy , 31 : 381 – 398 .
   Google Scholar
• Ranbaxy (available at: http://www.ranbaxy.com) .
   Google Scholar
• Shantha Biotechnics (available at: http://www.shanthabiotech.com) .
   Google Scholar
• Trefler , D. 1993 . International factor price differences: Leontieff was right! . Journal of Political Economy , 101 : 961 – 987 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wockhardt available at: http://www.wockhardt.com
   Google Scholar
• Zucker , L. G. , Darby , M. R. and Armstrong , J. S. 2002 . Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology . Management Science , 48 : 138 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar