Nested Methodological Approaches for Cluster Policy Evaluation: An Application to the Basque Country

REFERENCES

• Ahedo M. (2004) Cluster policy in the Basque Country (1991–2002): constructing ‘industry–government’ collaboration through cluster-associations, European Planning Studies 12, 1097–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón C., Aranguren M.-J. and Iturrioz C. (Eds) (2010) Evaluación de políticas clúster: El caso del País Vasco. Deusto, Bilbao:
   Google Scholar
• Aragón C., Aranguren M.-J., Iturrioz C. and Wilson J. R. (2012a) A social capital approach for network policy learning: the case of an established cluster initiative, European Urban and Regional Studies DOI: 10.1177/0969776411434847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón C., Aranguren M.-J., Iturrioz C. and Wilson J. R. (2012b) A participative methodology for evaluating the cluster policy of the Basque Country, in Cooke P., Parrilli M. D. and Curbelo J. L. (Eds) Innovation, Global Change and Territorial Resilience, pp. 382–402. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Aranguren M. J., de la Maza X., Parrilli M. D. and Wilson J. R. (2009) Asociaciones clúster de la CAPV: desempeño y retos, San Sebastián. Serie Clústeres, Desarrollo Regional e Innovación. Basque Institute of Competitiveness – Orkestra, San Sebastian.
   Google Scholar
• Aranguren M. J., Iturrioz C. and Wilson J. (2008) Networks, Governance and Economic Development. Edward Edgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Aranguren M. J., Larrea M. and Wilson J. R. (2010) Trayectorias de cambio en la gobernanza: experiencias en asociaciones cluster y redes comarcales en el País Vasco, Ekonomiaz 74, 160–177.
   Google Scholar
• Aranguren M. J. and Navarro I. (2003) La política de clusters en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco: una primera valoración, Ekonomiaz 53, 90–113.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim B. (2010) A new regional innovation policy, in Parrilli M. D. (Ed.) Innovación y aprendizaje: lecciones para el diseño de políticas, pp. 102–113. Innobasque IVC, Bilbao and San Sebastian.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Feldman M. P. (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review 86, 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basque Institute of Competitiveness (2009) Second Competitiveness Report. Basque Institute of Competitiveness – Orkestra, San Sebastian.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini G. (1991) Italian industrial districts; problems and perspectives, International Studies of Management and Organization 21, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Belussi F. (2006) In search of a useful theory of spatial clustering, in Asheim B. T., Cooke P. and Martin R. (Eds) Clusters and Regional Development, pp. 69–89. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth P. and Charles D. (2001) Bridging cluster theory and practice: learning from the cluster policy cycle, in Den Hertog P. (Ed.) Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems. OECD Publ., Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás S. and Tsagdis D. (2008) Cluster Policies in Europe – Firms, Institutions, and Governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Brown R. (2000) Cluster Dynamics in Theory and Practice with Application to Scotland, Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper Number 38. European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P., Gomez-Uranga M. and Etxebarria G. (1998) Regional systems of innovation: institutions and organisational dimensions, Research Policy 26, 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Maza X., Aranguren M. J. and Murciego A. (2008) Small enterprises involvement within the Basque cluster policy: a new challenge. Paper presented at the 11th European Network on Industrial Policy (EUNIP) International Conference, San Sebastian, Spain, 10–12 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• De la Maza X., Vendrell-Herrero F. and Wilson J. R. (2012) Where is the value of cluster associations for SMEs?, Intangible Capital 8(2), 472–496.
   Google Scholar
• Deheija R. and Wahba S. (2002) Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies, Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 151–161. doi: 10.1162/003465302317331982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez M. A. (2002) Evaluating new regional policies. Reviewing the theory and practice, Evaluation 8, 285–305. doi: 10.1177/135638902401462439
   Google Scholar
• Duranton G. and Puga D. (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products, American Economic Review 91, 1444–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman C. (1991) Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues, Research Policy 20, 499–514. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromhold-Eisebith M. and Eisebith G. (2005) How to institutionalize innovative clusters? Comparing explicit top down and implicit bottom-up approaches, Research Policy 34, 1250–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromhold-Eisebith M. and Eisebith G. (2008) Looking behind facades: evaluating effects of (automotive) cluster promotion, Regional Studies 42, 1343–1356. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou L. (2004) Evaluation of Behavioural Additionality. Concept Paper. Making the Difference. The Evaluation of ‘Behavioural Additionality’. OECD Publ, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser E. L., Kallal H. D., Scheinkman J. A. and Shleifer A. (1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152. doi: 10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greunz L. (2004) Industrial structure and innovation. Evidence from European regions, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, 563–592. doi: 10.1007/s00191-004-0234-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica 47, 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber P. J. (1967) The behaviour of maximum-likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, 221–223.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins R. (2001) Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: evaluating the impact of initiatives in the United Kingdom, Research Policy 30, 443–458. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00092-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen A. and Hauge E. (2002) Regional Clusters in Europe, Observatory of European SMEs 2002 Number 3. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Iturrioz C., Aranguren M. J., Aragón C. and Larrea M. (2006) La política industrial de cluster/redes mejora realmente la competitividad empresarial. Resultados de la evaluación de dos experiencias en la CAPV, Ekonomiaz 60, 20–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ketels C. (2004) European clusters, in Structural Change in Europe – Innovative City and Business Regions, pp. 1–5. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk A. and Cornford J. (2000) Regional institutions and knowledge-tracking new forms of regional development policy, Geoforum 31, 209–218. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuven E. and Sianesi B. (2003) PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing. Statistical Software Components S432001. Boston College Department of Economics, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzen M. (2005) Editorial: Why do clusters change?, European Urban and Regional Studies 12, 203–208. doi: 10.1177/0969776405059046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall A. (1907) Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall A. (1919) Industry and Trade. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Martin F., Mayer T. and Mayneris F. (2011a) Public support to clusters: a firm level study of French ‘local productive systems’, Regional Science and Urban Economics 41, 108–123. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F., Mayer T. and Mayneris F. (2011b) Spatial concentration and firm-level productivity in France, Journal of Urban Economics 69(2), 182–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R. and Sunley P. (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?, Journal of Economic Geography 3, 5–35. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald F., Huang Q., Tsagdis D. and Tüselmann H. J. (2007) Is there evidence to support Porter-type cluster policies?, Regional Studies 41(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1080/00343400601136284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers C. and Wintjes R. (2008) Innovation Policy in Europe – Measurement and Strategy. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R. (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1999) Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. OECD Publ, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) Competitive Regional Clusters. National Policy Approaches. OECD Publ, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Research (2008) Cluster Policy in Europe: A Brief Summary of Cluster Policies in 31 European Countries. Report for the Europe Innova Cluster Mapping Project (available at: http://www.clusterobservatory.eu).
   Google Scholar
• Paci R. and Usai S. (2000) The role of specialisation and diversity externalities in the agglomeration of innovative activities, Rivista Italiana degli Economisti 5, 237–268.
   Google Scholar
• Parrilli M. D. (2004) A stage and eclectic approach to industrial district development, European Planning Studies 12(8), 1115–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrilli M. D. (2008) Introduction, in Parrili M. D., Bianchi P. and Sugden R. (Eds) High Technology, Productivity and Networks: A Systemic Approach to SME Development, pp. 3–34. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Piore M. J. and Sabel C. F. (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. Basic Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Pitelis C., Sugden R. and Wilson J. (2006) Globalisation and Governance: The Development of Urban and Regional Economies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review 76, 77–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. (2003) The performance of regions, Regional Studies 37(6/7), 549–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. and Ketels M. (2009) Clusters and industrial districts: common roots, different perspectives, in Becattini G., Bellandi M. and De Propris L. (Eds) Handbook of Industrial Districts, pp. 172–186. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Doput K. W. and Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganisational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 116–145. doi: 10.2307/2393988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raines P. (2002) The challenge of evaluating cluster behaviour in economic development policy, Paper presented at the International Regional Studies Association (RSA) Conference ‘Evaluation and EU Regional Policy: New Questions and Challenges’, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose A. and Gill N. (2003) The global trend towards devolution and its implications, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21, 333–351. doi: 10.1068/c0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. R. and Rubin D. B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effect, Biometrika 70(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. L. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedeberg C. (2010) Evaluation of cluster policy: a methodological overview, Evaluation 16(4), 389–412. doi: 10.1177/1356389010381184
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz H. (1995) Collective efficiency: growth path for small scale industry, Journal of Development Studies 31, 529–586. doi: 10.1080/00220389508422377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sölvell Ö., Lindquist G. and Ketels C. (2003) The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Bromma tryck AB, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer G. M., Vinodrai T., Gertler M. S. and Wolfe D. A. (2009) Do clusters make a difference? Defining and assessing their economic performance, Regional Studies 44, 697–715. doi: 10.1080/00343400903107736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey D. J. (2000) Six steps to heaven: evaluating the impact of public policies to support small businesses in developed economies, in Sexton D. L. and Landström H. (Eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, pp. 176–194. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Storey D. J. (2004) Evaluation of SMEs Policies and Programmes. Document prepared in cooperation with the SME Unit of the OECD Secretariat for the 2nd OECD Conference of Ministries Responsible for SMEs held in Istanbul, Turkey, 2–3 June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Terstriep J. (2007) Balance Scorecard, Measuring CM Performance. Europe Innova, Innovation and Clusters, Nice.
   Google Scholar
• Turok I. (1990) Evaluation and accountability in spatial economic policy: a review of alternative approaches, Scottish Geographical Magazine 106(1), 4–11. doi: 10.1080/00369229018736769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• White H. (1982) Maximum likelihood of misspecified models, Econometrica 50, 1–25. doi: 10.2307/1912526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. (2003) Cluster-sample method in applied econometrics, American Economic Review 93(2), 133–138. doi: 10.1257/000282803321946930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar