Learning in ‘Organized Anarchies’: The Nature of Technological Search Processes at Trade Fairs

REFERENCES

• Aldrich H. E. and Fiol C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation, Academy of Management Review 19, 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin A. and Cohendet P. (2004). Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Archibugi D., Howells J. and Michie J. (1999). Innovation systems and policy in a global economy, in Archibugi D., Howells J. and Michie J. (Eds) Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, pp. 1–17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies 29, 155–173. doi: 10.2307/2295952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim B. T. (1999). Interactive learning and localised knowledge in globalising learning economies, GeoJournal 49, 345–352. doi: 10.1023/A:1007155221758
   Google Scholar
• Backer L. and Clark T. S. (2008). Eco-effective greening decisions and rationalizations: the case of Shell renewables, Organization and Environment 21, 227–244. doi: 10.1177/1086026608321328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt H. (2005). Cluster relations in the media industry: exploring the ‘distanced neighbour’ paradox in Leipzig, Regional Studies 39, 105–127. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt H. and Glückler J. (2011). The Relational Economy: Geographies of Knowing and Learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt H. and Schuldt N. (2008). Between luminaries and meat grinders: international trade fairs as temporary clusters, Regional Studies 42, 853–868. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt H. and Schuldt N. (2010). International trade fairs and global buzz, Part I: Ecology of global buzz, European Planning Studies 18, 1957–1974. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.515815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell M. (1984) ‘Learning’ and the accumulation of industrial technological capacity in developing countries, in Fransman M. and King K. (Eds) Technological Capability in the Third World, pp. 187–209. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Borghini S., Golfetto F. and Rinallo D. (2004) Using anthropological methods to study industrial marketing and purchasing: an exploration of professional trade shows. Paper presented at the Industrial Marketing Purchasing Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Borghini S., Golfetto F. and Rinallo D. (2006). Ongoing search among industrial buyers, Journal of Business Research 59, 1151–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundgaard U. and Vrangbæk K. (2007). Reform by coincidence? Explaining the policy process of structural reform in Denmark, Scandinavian Political Studies 30, 491–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00190.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F. and Lowenstein G. (2004). Behavioral economics: past, present, future, inCamerer C. F., Lowenstein G. and Rabin M. (Eds) Advances in Behavioral Economics, pp. 1–52. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Carrincazeaux C. and Coris M. (2011). Proximity and innovation, in Cooke P., Asheim B., Boschma R., Martin R., Schwartz D. and Tödtling F. (Eds) The Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, pp. 269–281. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Carrincazeaux C., Lung Y. and Vicente J. (2008). The scientific trajectory of the French School of Proximity: interaction- and institution-based approaches to regional innovation systems, European Planning Studies 16, 617–628. doi: 10.1080/09654310802049117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G. (1998). Stylized facts and close dialogue: methodology in economic geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, 73–87. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen E. and Schreiber P. (2000). Messen optimal nutzen: Ziele definieren und Erfolge programmieren [How to Optimise the Use of Trade Fairs: Defining Goals and Planning Success]. Schimmel, Würzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., March J. G. and Olsen J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice, Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1–25. doi: 10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohendet P., Héraud J.-A. and Llerena P. (Forthcoming 2013) A microeconomic approach of the dynamics of creation, in Meusburger P., Glückler J. and Ries M. (Eds) Knowledge and Economy. Klaus Tschira Symposia: Knowledge and Space 5. Springer, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P. and Morgan K. (1998). The Associational Economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch C. (2005). Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• DeFillippi R. J. and Arthur M. B. (1998). Paradox in project-based enterprise: the case of film making, California Management Review 40, 125–139. doi: 10.2307/41165936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Research 14, 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle J. and Rocamora A. (2006). The field of fashion materialized: a study of London Fashion Week, Sociology 40, 735–751. doi: 10.1177/0038038506065158
   Google Scholar
• Fardal H. and Sørnes J. O. (2008). IS strategic decision-making: a garbage can view, Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 5, 553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M. P. and Audretsch D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization, and localized competition, European Economic Review 43, 409–429. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioretti G. and Lomi A. (2010). Passing the buck in the garbage can model of organizational choice, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 16, 113–143. doi: 10.1007/s10588-010-9070-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George D. (2001). Preference Pollution. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler M. S. (2001). Best practice? Geography, learning and the institutional limits to strong convergence, Journal of Economic Geography 1, 5–26. doi: 10.1093/jeg/1.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Gertler M. S. (2004). Manufacturing Culture: The Institutional Geography of Industrial Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser E. L. (2003). Psychology and the Market. Discussion Paper Number 2023. Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Godar S. H. and O’Connor P. J. (2001). Same time next year – buyer trade show motives, Industrial Marketing Management 30, 77–86. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00100-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher G. (2002). Cool projects, boring institutions: temporary collaboration in social context, Regional Studies 36, 205–214. doi: 10.1080/00343400220122025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P. A. and Soskice D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism, in Hall P. A. and Soskice D. (Eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, pp. 1–68. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hartfiel G. and Hillmann K.-H. (1982). Wörterbuch der Soziologie [Dictionary of Sociology]. Kröner, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Hood C. (1999). The garbage can model of organization: describing a condition or a prescriptive design principle, in Egeberg M. and Laegreid P. (Eds) Organizing Political Institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen, pp. 59–78. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Kerin R. A. and Cron W. L. (1987). Assessing trade show functions and performance: an exploratory study, Journal of Marketing 51, 87–94. doi: 10.2307/1251649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd Edn. HarperCollins, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kirat T. and Lung Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity: territories as loci of collective learning processes, European Urban and Regional Studies 6, 27–39. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuran T. (1997). Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lampel J. and Meyer A. D. (2008). Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: how conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets, Journal of Management Studies 45, 1025–1035. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00787.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson C. and Lorenz E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity, Regional Studies 33, 302–317. doi: 10.1080/713693555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall B.-Å. (1992). Introduction, in Lundvall B.-Å. (Ed.) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, pp. 1–19. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall B.-Å. and Johnson B. (1994). The learning economy, Journal of Industry Studies 1, 23–42. doi: 10.1080/13662719400000002
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall B.-Å. and Maskell P. (2000). Nation states and economic development – from national systems of production to national systems of knowledge creation and learning, in Clark G. L., Feldman M. P. and Gertler M. S. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, pp. 353–372. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki E. J. (1980). Corporate organization of R and D and the location of technological activities, Regional Studies 14, 219–234. doi: 10.1080/09595238000185201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki E. J. (1991). Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional, and National Change. Longman, Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki E. J. (2010). Global knowledge and creativity: new challenges for firms and regions, Regional Studies 44, 1033–1052. doi: 10.1080/00343400903108676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg A. and Maskell P. (2006). Localized learning revisited, Growth and Change 37, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March J. G. and Olsen J. P. (1979). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, 2nd Edn. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• March J. G. and Olsen J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Free Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• March J. G. and Weissinger-Baylon R. (1986). Ambiguity and Command: Organizational Perspectives on Military Decision-Making. Pitman, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell P., Bathelt H. and Malmberg A. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters, European Planning Studies 14, 997–1013. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell P., Eskelinen H., Hannibalsson I., Malmberg A. and Vatne E. (1998). Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development: Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell P. and Malmberg A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning, European Urban and Regional Studies 6, 9–25. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meusburger P. (2008). The nexus of knowledge and space, in Meusburger P., Welker M. and Wunder E. (Eds) Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Klaus Tschira Symposia: Knowledge and Space 1, pp. 35–90. Springer, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering G. (2010). Collective Market – Making at an Engineering Conference. MPIfG Discussion Paper Number 10/2. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (MPIfG), Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann W. W. (1998). Foreign policy decision making, garbage cans, and policy shifts: the Eisenhower administration and the ‘chances for peace’ speech, American Review of Public Administration 28, 187–212. doi: 10.1177/027507409802800205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge/Kegan Paul, London.
   Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Prüser S. M. (2003). Die Messe als Networking-Plattform [The trade fair as a platform for networking], in Kirchgeorg M., Dornscheidt W. M., Giese W. and Stoeck N. (Eds) Handbuch Messemanagement: Planung, Durchführung und Kontrolle von Messen, Kongressen und Events [Handbook of Trade Fair Management: Planning, Execution and Control of Trade Fairs, Conventions and Events], pp. 1181–1195. Gabler, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Rallet A. and Torre A. (2005). Proximity and localization, Regional Studies 39, 47–59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallet A. and Torre A. (2009). Temporary geographical proximity for business and work coordination: when, how and where?, SPACES online 2009-02 (available at: http://www.spaces-online.com).
   Google Scholar
• Rinallo D. and Golfetto F. (2006). Representing markets: the shaping of fashion trends by French and Italian fabric companies, Industrial Marketing Management 35, 856–869. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross L. and Nisbet R. (1991). The Person and the Situation. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Rosson P. J. and Seringhaus F. H. R. (1995). Visitor and exhibitor interaction at industrial trade fairs, Journal of Business Research 32, 81–90. doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(94)00012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldt N. and Bathelt H. (2011). International trade fairs and global buzz, Part II: Practices of global buzz, European Planning Studies 19, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.530390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland A. and Balogh P. (1996). The value of nonselling activities at international trade shows, Industrial Marketing Management 25, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/0019-8501(95)00065-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short J., Williams E. and Christie B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens R. P. (2005). Trade Show and Event Marketing: Plan, Promote, Profit. Thompson, Mason, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Storper M. (1997). The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. Guilford, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Storper M.The economics of context, location and trade: another great transformation?, in Becattini G., Bellandi M. and De Propris L. (Eds) The Handbook of Industrial Districts, pp. 141–157. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham2009a.
   Google Scholar
• Storper M.Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: Regional context and global trade, Economic Geography2009b85, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.01001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper M. and Venables A. J. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy, Journal of Economic Geography 4, 351–370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift N. (2000). Performing cultures in the new economy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, 674–692. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission, Regional Studies 42, 869–889. doi: 10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bernuth C. and Bathelt H. (2007). The organizational paradox in advertising and the reconfiguration of project cooperation, Geoforum 38, 545–557. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. A. (1987). Has a customer already developed your next product?, in Roberts E. B. (Ed.) Generating Technological Innovation, pp. 105–116. University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Weller S. (2008). Beyond ‘global production networks’: Australian Fashion Week's trans-sectoral synergies, Growth and Change 39, 104–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2007.00407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar