Labour Productivity and Technology Gap in European Regions: A Conditional Frontier Approach

REFERENCES

• Abramovitz, M. (1986) Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind, Journal of Economic History 46(2), 385–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. Independent Report.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S. and Weil, D.N. (1998) Appropriate technology and growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4), 1025–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, J. and Spiegel, M. (2005) Human capital and technology diffusion, in Aghion P. and Durlauf S. N. (Eds) Handbook of Economic Growth, 935–966.North-Holland, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F. (2011) Closing the technology gap?, Review of Development Economics 15(1), 180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Este P., Guy F. and Iammarino S. (2012) Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter?, Journal of Economic Geography doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs010.
   Google Scholar
• Daraio, C. and Simar, L. (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis 24(1), 93–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettori, B., Marrocu, E. and Paci, R. (2012) Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions, Regional Studies 46(10), 1401–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enflo, K. and Hjertstrand, P. (2009) Relative sources of European regional productivity convergence: a bootstrap frontier approach, Regional Studies 43(5), 643–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010a) Investing in Europe's Future: Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010b) Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS) 2009. DG Enterprise and Industry, European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. (1994) Technology and international differences in growth rates, Journal of Economic Literature 32(3), 1147–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Noriss, M. and Zhang, Z. (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries, American Economic Review 84(1), 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippetti, A. and Peyrache, A. (2011) The patterns of technological capabilities of countries: a dual approach using composite indicator and data envelopment analysis, World Development 37(7), 1108–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gacova, Z. and Dijkstra, L. (2008) Labour Mobility Between the Regions of the EU-27 and a Comparison with the USA. European Union, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Gerschenkron, A. (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, D.J. and Russell, R.R. (2005) Human capital and convergence: a production-frontier approach, International Economic Review 46(4), 1167–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S. and McCann, P. (2006) The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers, Research Policy 35(7), 1018–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991) Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. and Russell, R.R. (2002) Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence, American Economic Review 92(3), 527–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, S. (1992) Technological capabilities and industrialization, World Development 20(2), 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes, D. (1969) The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Los, B. and Timmer, M.P. (2005) The ‘appropriate technology’ explanation of productivity growth: an empirical approach, Journal of Development Economics 77(2), 517–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.A. and Johnson, B. (1994) The learning economy, Industry and Innovation 1(2), 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (1998) Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development, Economic Geography 74(3), 201–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., Paci, R. and Usai, S. (2005) Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions, Environment and Planning 37(10), 1793–1812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2011) Regions and Innovation Policy. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Parente, S.L. and Prescott, E.C. (1994) Barriers to technology adoption and development, Journal of Political Economy 102(2), 298–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. (2007) What kind of local and regional development and for whom?, Regional Studies 41(9), 1253–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmookler, J. (1962) Economic sources of inventive activity, Journal of Economic History, March), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes, Journal of Econometrics 136(1), 31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SWECO (2008) ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure. SWECO, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Todtling, F. (2010) Endogenous approaches to local and regional development policy, in Pike A., Rodriguez-Pose A. and Tomane J. (Eds) Handbook of Local and Regional Development, 333–348.Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M. (1990) Patents as Indicators of Innovation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar