Regional Effect Heterogeneity of Start-up Subsidies for the Unemployed

REFERENCES

• Audretsch D. and Keilbach M. (2004) Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance, Regional Studies 38, 949–959. doi: 10.1080/0034340042000280956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. and Mahmood T. (1995) New firm survival: new results using a hazard function, Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 97–103. doi: 10.2307/2109995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchflower D. and Oswald A. (1998) What makes an entrepreneur?, Journal of Labor Economics 16, 26–60. doi: 10.1086/209881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden R. J. (1999) Flexible working hours, family responsibilities, and female self-employment: gender differences in self-employment selection, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58(1), 71–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1999.tb03285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brixy U. and Grotz R. (2006) Regional Patterns and Determinants of New Firm Formation and Survival in Western Germany. Discussion Paper Number 5/2006. Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo M. and Hujer R. (2006) The microeconometric estimation of treatment effects – an overview, Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 90(1), 197–212. doi: 10.1007/s10182-006-0230-4
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo M. and Kopeinig S. (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching, Journal of Economic Surveys 22(1), 31–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo M. and Kritikos A. (2009) ‘I Want To, But I Also Need To’: Start-ups Resulting from Opportunity and Necessity. Discussion Paper Number 4661. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo M. and Kritikos A. (2010) Start-ups by the unemployed: characteristics, survival and direct employment effects, Small Business Economics 35(1), 71–92. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9208-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo M. and Künn S. (2011) Start-up subsidies for the unemployed: long-term evidence and effect heterogeneity, Journal of Public Economics 95(3–4), 311–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo M. and Künn S. (2012) Getting Back into the Labor Market: The Effects of Start-up Subsidies for Unemployed Females. Discussion Paper Number 6830. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Dar A. and Gill I. S. (1998) Evaluating retraining programs in OECD countries: lessons learned, World Bank Research Observer 13(1), 79–101. doi: 10.1093/wbro/13.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Dar A. and Tzannatos Z. (1999) Active Labor Market Programs: A Review of the Evidence from Evaluations. SP Discussion Paper Number 9901. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fahr R. and Sunde U. (2009) Did the Hartz reforms speed-up the matching process? A macro-evaluation using empirical matching functions, German Economic Review 10(3), 284–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00457.x
   Google Scholar
• Falck O. (2007) Survival chances of new businesses: do regional conditions matter?, Applied Economics 39, 2039–2048. doi: 10.1080/00036840600749615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay R. (1996) Enhancing the Effectiveness of Active Labor Market Policies: Evidence from Programme Evaluations in OECD Countries. Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers Number 18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch M. (2008) How does new business development affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue, Small Business Economics 30, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9057-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch M., Brixy U. and Falck O. (2006) The effect of industry, region and time on new business survival – a multi-dimensional analysis, Review of Industrial Organization 28, 285–306. doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-0018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgellis Y. and Wall H. J. (2000) What makes a region entrepreneurial? Evidence from Britain, Annals of Regional Science 34(3), 385–403. doi: 10.1007/s001689900014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurley-Calvez T., Biehl A. and Harper K. (2009) Time–use patterns and women entrepreneurs, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 99(2), 139–144. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton R. T. (1986) The influence of unemployment on the level and rate of company formation in Scotland, 1950–1984, Environment and Planning A 18, 1401–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton R. T. (1989) Unemployment and business formation rates: reconciling time-series and cross-section evidence, Environment and Planning A 21, 249–255. doi: 10.1068/a210249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman J., Ichimura H., Smith J. and Todd P. (1998) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data, Econometrica 66(5), 1017–1098. doi: 10.2307/2999630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens G. and Wooldridge J. M. (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation, Journal of Economic Literature 47(1), 5–86. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangasharju A. (2000) Regional variations in firm formation: panel and cross-section data evidence from Finland, Papers in Regional Science 79, 355–373. doi: 10.1007/PL00011482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble D. and Walker S. (1994) New firms, small firms and dead firms: spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom, Regional Studies 28(4), 411–427. doi: 10.1080/00343409412331348366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapper L. F. and Parker S. C. (2011) Gender and the business environment for new firm creation, World Bank Research Observer 26(2), 237–257. doi: 10.1093/wbro/lkp032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluve J. (2010) The effectiveness of European active labor market programs, Labour Economics 16(6), 904–918. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluve J. and Schmidt C. M. (2002) Can training and employment subsidies combat European unemployment?, Economic Policy 17(35), 409–448. doi: 10.1111/1468-0327.00093
   Google Scholar
• Knight F. H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton-Mifflin, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Lechmann D. and Schnabel C. (2012) Why is there a gender earnings gap in self-employment? A decomposition analysis with German data, IZA Journal of European Labor Studies 1(6).
   Google Scholar
• Lechner M. and Wunsch C. (2009) Are training programs more effective when unemployment is high?, Journal of Labor Economics 27(4), 653–692. doi: 10.1086/644976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner M. and Wunsch C. (2013) Sensitivity of matching-based program evaluations to the availability of control variables, Labour Economics 21, 111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P. and Grubb D. (2001) What works and for whom: a review of OECD countries’ experiences with active labour market policies, Swedish Economic Policy Review 8, 9–56.
   Google Scholar
• McVicar D. and Podivinsky J. M. (2010) Are Active Labour Market Programmes Least Effective Where They Are Most Needed? The Case of the British New Deal for Young People. Working Paper Number 16/10. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Affairs, Melbourne, VIC.
   Google Scholar
• Meager N. (1996) From unemployment to self-employment: labour market policies for business start-up, in Schmidt G., O'Reilly J. and Schömann K. (Eds) International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, pp. 489–519. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Parker S. C. (2009) The Economics of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Perry G. (2006) Are Business Start-up Subsidies Effective for the Unemployed?: Evaluation of Enterprise Allowance. Working Paper. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds P., Storey D. and Westhead P. (1994) Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates: an editorial overview, Regional Studies 28(4), 343–346. doi: 10.1080/00343409412331348306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. R. (2002) Observational Studies. Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. and Rubin D. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika 70(1), 41–50. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A. (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings, Oxford Economic Papers 3(2), 135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin D. (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomised and nonrandomised studies, Journal of Educational Psychology 66, 688–701. doi: 10.1037/h0037350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane S. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Sianesi B. (2004) An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labour market programmes in the 1990s, Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1), 133–155. doi: 10.1162/003465304323023723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J. and Todd P. (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?, Journal of Econometrics 125(1–2), 305–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey D. (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Suciu G. P., Lemeshow S. and Moeschberger M. (2004) Statistical tests of the equality of survival curves: reconsidering the options, in Balakrishnan N. and Rao C. R. (Eds) Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 23, pp. 251–262. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Tervo H. (2006) Regional unemployment, self-employment and family background, Applied Economics 38, 1055–1062. doi: 10.1080/00036840500400053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokila A. (2009) Start-up Grants and Self-Employment Duration. Working Paper. School of Business and Economics, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Van Praag C. M. (2003) Business survival and success of young small business owners, Small Business Economics 21(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1023/A:1024453200297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner J. and Sternberg R. (2004) Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data, Annals of Regional Science 38, 219–240. doi: 10.1007/s00168-004-0193-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar