Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes

REFERENCES

• Acs Z., Anselin L. and Varga A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy 31, 1069–1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcacer J. and Gittelman M. (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: the influence of examiner citations, Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 774–779. doi: 10.1162/rest.88.4.774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida P. (1996) Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry, Strategic Management Journal 17, 155–165. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli C. (1995) The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur B. (Ed.) (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim B. and Gertler M. (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems, in Fagerberg J., Mowery D. and Nelson R. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 291–317. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson A. and Stiglitz J. (1969) A new view of technical change, Economic Journal 79, 573–578. doi: 10.2307/2230384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management 17, 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt H., Malmberg A. and Maskell P. (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography 28, 131–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binswanger H. (1974) A microeconomic approach to induced innovation, Economic Journal 84, 940–958. doi: 10.2307/2230575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. Everett M. and Freeman L. (2002) UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma R., Balland P. A. and Kogler D. (2013) Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2007) A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process, Journal of Economic Geography 7, 635–649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R., Minondo A. and Navarro M. (2012) Related variety and regional growth in Spain, Papers in Regional Science 91, 241–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi S. and Lissoni F. (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey, Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 975–1005. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Breschi S. and Lissoni F. (2005) Knowledge networks from patent data: methodological issues and research targets, in Moed H., Glanzel W. and Schmoch U. (Eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp. 613–643. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi S., Lissoni F. and Malerba F. (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification, Research Policy 32, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. and Piscitello C. (2002) The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: the role of spillovers and local competencies, Journal of International Management 8, 69–96. doi: 10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00056-4
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell J. and Vertova G. (2004) Historical evolution of technological diversification, Research Policy 33, 511–529. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen W. and Levinthal D. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli A., Krafft J. and Quatraro F. (2012) The Emergence of New Technology-Based Sectors at the Regional Level: A Proximity-Based Analysis of Nanotechnology. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography Number 12.11. Utrecht University, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Colombelli A., Krafft J. and Quatraro F. (2013) Properties of knowledge base and firm survival: evidence from a sample of French manufacturing firms, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80, 1469–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke P., Uranga M. and Etxebarria G. (1997) Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions, Research Policy 26, 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David P. (1975) Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• David P. (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review 75, 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi G. (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy 11, 147–162. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison G. and Glaeser E. (1999) The geographical concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration?, American Economic Review 89, 311–316. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelsman E. and van Raan A. (1994) A patent-based cartography of technology, Research Policy 23, 1–26. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90024-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson R. and Kislev Y. (1976) A stochastic model of applied research, Journal of Political Economy 84, 265–282. doi: 10.1086/260431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman M. (1994) The Geography of Innovation. Kluwer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M., Kogler D. and Rigby D. (2013) rKnowledge: The Spatial Diffusion of rDNA Methods. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography Number 13.11. Utrecht University, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M. and Lendel I. (2010) Under the lens: the geography of optical science as an emerging industry, Economic Geography 86, 147–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M., Scherngell T. and Jansenberger E. (2006) The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe: evidence from a spatial interaction modeling perspective, Geographical Analysis 38, 288–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2006.00687.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming L. (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search, Management Science 47, 117–132. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming L. and Sorenson O. (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data, Research Policy 30, 1019–1039. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida R. (2002) Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman C. (1985) The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken K., van Oort F. and Verburg T. (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth, Regional Studies 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler M. (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there), Journal of Economic Geography 3, 75–99. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower J. (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties, Biometrics 27, 857–871. doi: 10.2307/2528823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher G. (1993) The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area, in Grabher G. (Ed.) The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, pp. 255–277. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth, Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116. doi: 10.2307/3003321
   Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B., Jaffe A. and Trajtenberg M. (2001) The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper Number 8498. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hall P. and Markusen A. (1985) High technology and regional-urban policy, in Hall P. and Markusen A. (Eds) Silicon Landscapes, pp. 144–151. Allen & Unwin, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann R. and Klinger B. (2007) The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage. Working Paper Number 146. Harvard University, Center for International Development, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo C., Klinger B., Barabassi A. and Hausmann R. (2007) The product space conditions the development of nations, Science 27, 482–487. doi: 10.1126/science.1144581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D, American Economic Review 76, 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. and Trajtenberg M. (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. and Henderson R. (1993) Geographical localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. (1993) The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kogler D., Rigby D. and Tucker I. (2013) Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in U.S. cities, European Planning Studies 21, 1374–1391. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai R., D'Amour A. and Fleming L. (2009) The Careers and Co-Authorship Networks of U.S. Patent-Holders, Since 1975. Harvard Business School, Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux N. and Sokoloff K. (1996) Long-term change in the organization of inventive activity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 12686–12692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson C. and Lorenz E. (1999) Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity, Regional Studies 33, 305–317. doi: 10.1080/713693555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leten B., Belderbos R. and van Looy B. (2007) Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms, Journal of Product Innovation and Management 24, 567–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00272.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas R. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. (1988) Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation, in Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G. and Soete L. (Eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 349–369. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. (Ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall B. and Johnson B. (1994) The Learning Economy. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon D., Cumbers A. and Chapman K. (2002) Learning, innovation and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates, Progress in Human Geography 26, 293–311. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph371ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki E. (2007) Cities and regions competing in the global economy: knowledge and local development policies, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25, 638–654. doi: 10.1068/c0645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen A., Chapple K. and Schrock G. (2001) High-Tech and I-Tech: How Metros Rank and Specialize. Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall A. (1920) Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Marx K. (1970) Capital, 3 vols. International, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell P. and Malmberg A. (1999) The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning, European Urban and Regional Planning Studies 6, 9–25. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer H. (2011) Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Second Tier Regions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan K. (1997) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies 31, 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke F., Henning M. and Boschma R. (2011) How do regions diversity over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions, Economic Geography 87, 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson R. and Winter S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Nesta L. and Saviotti P. (2005) Coherence of the knowledge base and firm's innovative performance: evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Industrial Economics 53, 123–142. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1821.2005.00248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Huallachain B. (1999) Patent places: size matters, Journal of Regional Science 39, 613–636. doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Huallachain B. and Lee D. (2010) Technological variety and specialization in urban invention, Regional Studies 45, 67–88. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.486783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson O. and Frey B. (2002) Entrepreneurship as recombinant growth, Small Business Economics 19, 69–80. doi: 10.1023/A:1016261420372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. (1982) R&D, patenting and innovative activities: a statistical exploration, Research Policy 11, 33–51. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. (1985) Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems, Scientometrics 7, 77–99. doi: 10.1007/BF02020142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perroux F. (1955) Note sur la notion de ‘pole de croissance’, Èconomie Appliquèe 7, 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Pred A. (1977) City Systems in Advanced Economies. Hutchinson, London.
   Google Scholar
• Quatraro F. (2010) Knowledge coherence, variety and economic growth: manufacturing evidence from Italian regions, Research Policy 39, 1289–1302.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby D. and Essletzbichler J. (1997) Evolution, process variety, and regional trajectories of technological change, Economic Geography 73, 269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby D. and Essletzbichler J. (2006) Technological variety, technological change and a geography of production techniques, Journal of Economic Geography 6, 45–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahal D. (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer F. (1982) Interindustry technology flows in the United States, Research Policy 11, 227–245. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmookler J. (1966) Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Simon H. (1959) Theories of decision making in economics, American Economic Review 49, 252–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J. (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns, Management Science 51, 756–770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A. (1776) The Wealth of Nations. Modern Library, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Solow R. (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 66, 65–94. doi: 10.2307/1884513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonn J. and Storper M. (2008) The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: an analysis of U.S. patent citations, Environment and Planning A 40, 1020–1039. doi: 10.1068/a3930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper M. (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies, European Urban and Regional Studies 2, 191–221.
   Google Scholar
• Storper M. (1997) The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. Guilford, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Strumsky D. Lobo J. and van der Leeuw S. (2012) Using patent technology codes to study technological change, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 21, 267–286. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.578709
   Google Scholar
• Stuart T. and Podolny J. (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities, Strategic Management Journal 17, 21–38. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece D., Rumelt R., Dosi G. and Winter S. (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23, 1–30. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson P. and Fox-Keane M. (2005) Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: a reassessment, American Economic Review 95, 450–460. doi: 10.1257/0002828053828509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todtling F. and Trippl M. (2005) One size fits all? Toward a differentiated regional innovation policy approach, Research Policy 34, 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspagen B. (1997) Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: estimates from the European and US Patent Office Databases, Economic Systems Research 9, 47–65. doi: 10.1080/09535319700000004
   Google Scholar
• Vertova G. (1999) Stability in national patterns of technological specialization: some historical evidence from patent data, Economic of Innovation and New Technology 8, 331–354. doi: 10.1080/10438599900000014
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Webber M., Sheppard E. and Rigby D. (1992) Forms of technical change, Environment and Planning A 24, 1679–1709. doi: 10.1068/a241679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman M. (1998) Recombinant growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 2, 331–360. doi: 10.1162/003355398555595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. (1984) A resource based view of the firm, Strategic Management 5, 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar