The Co-evolution of Proximities – A Network Level Study

REFERENCES

• Arundel A. and Geuna A. (2004) Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13, 559–580. doi:10.1080/1043859092000234311
   Google Scholar
• Balland P. A. (2012) Proximity and the evolution of collaborative networks: evidence from R&D projects within the GNSS industry, Regional Studies 46, 741–756. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.529121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland P. A., Boschma R. A. and Frenken K. (2014) Proximity and innovation: from statics to dynamics, Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland P. A., De Vaan M. and Boschma R. (2013) The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: the case of the global video games industry 1987–2007, Journal of Economic Geography 13, 741–765. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellet M., Colletis G. and Lung Y. (1993) Economie de proximités, Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine 3, 357–361.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath Y. (1980) The f-connection: families, friends, and firms and the organization of exchange, Population and Development Review 6, 1–30. doi:10.2307/1972655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2010) The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective, in Boschma R. and Martin R. (Eds) Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, pp. 120–135. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma R. A. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. A. and Iammarino S. (2009) Related variety, trade links, and regional growth in Italy, Economic Geography 85, 289–311. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi C., Cefis E., Dosi G. and Secchi A. (2007) Invariances and diversities in the patterns of industrial evolution: some evidence from Italian manufacturing industries, Small Business Economics 29, 137–159. doi:10.1007/s11187-006-0014-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi S. and Lissoni F. (2003) Mobility and Social Networks: Localised Knowledge Spillovers Revisited. CESPRI Working Paper No. 142. Centro di Ricerca sui Processi di Innovazione e Internazionalizzazione (CESPRI), Bocconi University, Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi S. and Lissoni F. (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows, Journal of Economic Geography 9, 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel T. and Binder M. (2007) The regional dimension of knowledge transfers – a behavioral approach, Industry and Innovation 14, 151–175. doi:10.1080/13662710701252500
   Google Scholar
• Broekel T. and Boschma R. A. (2011) The Cognitive and Geographical Composition of Ego-Networks of Firms – And How they Impact on their Innovation Performance. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 11.18. Section of Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Broekel T. and Boschma R. (2012) Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry – the proximity paradox, Journal of Economic Geography 12, 409–433. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel T. and Graf H. (2012) Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks: a comparison of 10 technologies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 21, 345–372. doi:10.1080/10438599.2011.582704
   Google Scholar
• Buerger M., Broekel T. and Coad A. (2012) Regional dynamics of innovation – investigating the co-evolution of patents, R&D, and employment, Regional Studies 46, 565–582. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.520693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner U. and Graf H. (2006) The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis, Research Policy 35, 463–480. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad A. (2009) The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Coad A. and Rao R. (2006) Innovation and market value: a quantile regression analysis, Economic Bulletin 15, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen W. and Levinthal D. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfron B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife, Annals of Statistics 7, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder J. and Spielkamp A. (1998) Innovationsstrategien und Forschungsaktivitäten Ostdeutscher Unternehmen. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH, Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman M. P. and Florida R. (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, 210–229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornahl D., Broekel T. and Boschma R. A. (2011) What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location, Papers in Regional Science 90, 395–418. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler J. (2007) Economic geography and the evolution of networks, Journal of Economic Geography 7, 619–634. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher G. (1993) The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area, in Grabher G. (Ed.) The Embedded Firm – On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, pp. 255–277. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology 93, 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussinger K. (2010) On the importance of technological relatedness: SMEs versus large acquisition targets, Technovation 30, 57–64. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. and Henderson R. (1993) Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirat T. and Lung Y. (1999) Innovation and proximity. Territories as loci of collective learning processes, European Urban and Regional Studies 6, 27–38. doi:10.1177/096977649900600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R. and Hallock K. F. (2001) Quantile regression, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 143–156. doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld P. F. and Merton R. K. (1954) Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis, in Berger M., Abel T. and Page C. H. (Eds) Freedom and Control in Modern Society, pp. 18–66. Van Nostrand, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel M. (2013) Interrelating dynamic proximities by bridging, reducing and producing distances, Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.848978
   Google Scholar
• Neffke F. and Henning M. (2013) Skill relatedness and firm diversification, Strategic Management Journal 34, 297–316. doi:10.1002/smj.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. (2002) Trust. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Ponds R., Van Oort F. and Frenken K. (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration, Papers in Regional Science 86, 423–443. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallet A. and Torre A. (1990) Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy?, GeoJournal 49, 373–380. doi:10.1023/A:1007140329027
   Google Scholar
• Scherngell T. and Barber M. J. (2009) Spatial interaction modeling of cross-region R&D collaboration. empirical evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme, Papers in Regional Science 88, 531–546. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J. (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns, Management Science 51, 756–770. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson O. (2003) Social networks and industrial geography, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13, 513–527. doi:10.1007/s00191-003-0165-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock J. H. and Watson M. W. (2001) Vector autoregressions, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 101–115. doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal A. L. J. (2014) The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: geographic proximity versus triadic closure, Journal of Economic Geography 14, 589–620. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs063
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal A. and Boschma R. (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytical issues, Annals of Regional Science 43, 739–756. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson P. and Fox-Kean M. (2005) Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: a reassessment, American Economic Review 95, 450–460. doi:10.1257/0002828053828509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre A. and Rallet A. (2005) Proximity and localization, Regional Studies 39, 47–59. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte S. (2008) Cultural proximity in TV entertainment: an eight-country study on the relationship of nationality and the evaluation of U.Sprime-time fiction, Communications 33, 1–25. doi:10.1515/COMMUN.2008.001
   Google Scholar