Reform of the Barnett Formula with Needs Assessment: Can the Challenges be Overcome?

REFERENCES

• All Party Parliamentary Taxation Group (2013) Achieving Autonomy: What the Independence Referendum Means for Scotland's Fiscal Future. House of Commons, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft B. (2013) Has Scotland Already Spent its Oil Fund? (available at: http://www.scottisheconomywatch.com/brian-ashcrofts-scottish/2013/07/has-scotland-already-spent-its-oil-fund.html) (accessed on June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ball R., Eiser D. and King D. (2012) Replacing the Barnett Formula by Needs Assessment: Lessons from School Funding Formulae in England and Scotland. University of Stirling Working Paper, Glasgow (available at: http://www.barnett-or-needs.stir.ac.uk/documents/IFSeducationpaperDecember2013.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Ball R., Eiser D. and King D. (2013) Assessing relative spending needs of devolved government: the case of healthcare spending in the UK, Regional Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.779660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardsley M. and Dixon J. (2011) Developing a Person-Based Resource Allocation Formula for Allocations to General Practices in England. Nuffield Trust, London.
   Google Scholar
• Boadway R. and Tremblay J.-F. (2012) Reassessment of the Tiebout model, Journal of Public Economics 96, 1063–1078. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch N. (2009) The reform of regional government finances in Spain, in World Report on Fiscal Federalism, pp. 58–61. Institut d'Economia de Barcelona, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley G., Watkins D. and Karley N. K. (2011) An outcome-based resource allocation model for local education services in Wales, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29, 848–871. DOI:10.1068/c0987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buettner T. (2008) Fiscal equalisation in Germany, in Bosch N. and Duran J. (Eds) Fiscal Federalism and Political Decentralisation: Lessons from Germany, Spain and Canada, pp. 137–147. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Christie A. and Swales J. K. (2010) The Barnett allocation mechanism: formula plus influence?, Regional Studies 44, 761–775. DOI:10.1080/00343400903107710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comerford D. and Eiser D. (Forthcoming 2014) Constitutional change and inequality in Scotland, Oxford Review of Economic Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Devolution in Wales (2012) Empowerment and Responsibility: Financial Powers to Strengthen Wales. Commission on Devolution in Wales, Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Grants Commission (2010) Report of GST Revenue Sharing Relativities – 2010 Review. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott R., Bell D., Scott A., Ma A. and Roberts E. (2005) Devolved government and public sector pay reform: considerations of equity and efficiency, Regional Studies 39, 519–539. DOI:10.1080/00343400500128655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes T., Evans D. and Scott N. (2010) Implementing health and social care policy – England and Scotland compared, Policy Studies 31, 591–611. DOI:10.1080/01442871003615968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. and Stone M. (2011) The abuse of regression in the National Health Service allocation formulae: response to the Department of Health's 2007 ‘resource allocation research paper’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 174, 517–528. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00700.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer S. (2004) Four Way Bet: How Devolution has Led to Four Different Models for the NHS. Constitution Unit, University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hallwood C. P. and Macdonald R. (2009) The Political Economy of Financing Scottish Government: Considering a New Constitutional Settlement for Scotland. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Heald D. (2009) Memorandum by Professor David Heald, in House of Lords Select Committee on the Barnett Formula, The Barnett Formula: Report with Evidence, pp. 316–324. HL Paper No. 139. House of Lords, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber C. A. L., Lyytikäinen T. and Vermeulen W. (2011) Capitalization of central government grants into local house prices: panel data evidence from England, Regional Science and Urban Economics 41, 394–406. DOI:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2010) Funding the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly Government, and Northern Ireland Assembly: Statement of Funding Policy. HM Treasury, London.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2012) Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses (available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/pespub_index.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Independent Commission on Funding and Finance for Wales (2010) Fairness and Accountability: A New Funding Settlement for Wales. Welsh Government, Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• John P. and Ward H. (2001) Political manipulation in a majoritarian democracy: central government targeting of public funds to English subnational government, in space and across time, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3, 308–339. DOI:10.1111/1467-856X.00062
   Google Scholar
• Kay A., Bristow G., McGovern M. and Pickernell D. (2005) Fair division or fair dinkum? Australian lessons for intergovernmental fiscal relations in the United Kingdom, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23, 247–261. DOI:10.1068/c38m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecours A. and Béland D. (2010) Federalism and fiscal policy: the politics of equalization in Canada, Publius: Journal of Federalism 40, 569–596. DOI:10.1093/publius/pjp030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Government Association (2013) Ten Point Plan to Revive England's Economy and Public Services. Press Release, 2 July (available at: http://www.local.gov.uk/media-releases/-/journal_content/56/10180/4048851/NEWS).
   Google Scholar
• Mackay R. and Williams J. (2005) Thinking about need: public spending on the regions, Regional Studies 39, 815–828. DOI:10.1080/00343400500213812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren J. and Armstrong J. (2014) Scotland's economic performance and the fiscal implications of moving to independence, National Institute Economic Review 227, R3–R13. DOI:10.1177/002795011422700102
   Google Scholar
• McLean I. and McMillan A. (2005) The distribution of public expenditure across the UK regions, Fiscal Studies 24, 45–71. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean I., Lodge G. and Schmuecker K. (2008) Fair Shares: Barnett and the Politics of Public Expenditure. Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), London.
   Google Scholar
• Midwinter A. (2002) Territorial resource allocation in the UK: a rejoinder on needs assessment, Regional Studies 36, 563–577. DOI:10.1080/00343400220137164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midwinter A. (2006) The Barnett Formula and its critics revisited: evidence from the post-devolution period, Scottish Affairs 55, 64–86.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (2011) Formula Funding of Local Public Services. National Audit Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (2012) Healthcare Across the UK: A Comparison of the NHS in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Stationery Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose L. S. (1946) The elementary statistics of majority voting, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 109, 53–57. DOI:10.2307/2981392
   Google Scholar
• Propper C. and van Reenen J. (2010) Can pay regulation kill? Panel data evidence on the effect of labor markets on hospital performance, Journal of Political Economy 118, 222–273. DOI:10.1086/653137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reform Scotland (2012) DevoPlus: A Stronger Scotland within the UK. Reform Scotland, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Liberal Democrats (2012) Federalism: The Best Future for Scotland. Scottish Liberal Democrats, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Select Committee on the Barnett Formula (2009) The Barnett Formula. HL Paper No. 139, 1st Report of Session 2008–09. The Stationery Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Slomczynski W. and Zyczkowski K. (2006) Penrose voting system and optimal quota, Acta Physica Polonica B37, 3133–3143.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P. (2006) Formula Funding of Public Services. Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P. C. (2003) Formula funding of public services: an economic analysis, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19, 301–322. DOI:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M. and Galbraith J. (2006) How not to fund hospital and community health services in England, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 169, 143–164. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout C. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy 64, 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trench A. (2012) Devo more, Devo plus and so on: extending devolution in the UK, and financing it. Paper presented at the PSA Territorial Politics Group Conference, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Trench A. (2013) Funding Devo More: Fiscal Options for Strengthening the Union. Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), London.
   Google Scholar
• Wyn Jones R., Lodge G. and Jeffrey C. (2013) England and its Two Unions: The Anatomy of a Nation and its Discontents. Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), London.
   Google Scholar