Regional Heterogeneity and Interregional Research Spillovers in European Innovation: Modelling and Policy Implications

REFERENCES

• Acs Z. J. (2002) Innovation and the Growth of Cities. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Acs Z. J., Anselin L. and Varga A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measure of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy 31, 1069–1085. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L. (1988a) Lagrange multiplier test diagnostic for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity, Geographical Analysis 20, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L. (1988b) Spatial Econometrics Methods and Models. Kluwer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin L., Varga A. and Acs Z. (1997) Local geographical spillovers between university research and high technology Innovations, Journal of Urban Economics 42, 422–448. doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L., Varga A. and Acs Z. (2000) Geographical spillovers and university research: a spatial econometric perspective, Growth and Change 31, 501–515. doi:10.1111/0017-4815.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Feldman M. P. (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation, in Henderson J. V. and Thiesse J. F. (Eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, pp. 2713–2739. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard C. and LeSage J. P. (2011) Quantifying knowledge spillovers using spatial econometric models, Journal of Regional Science 51, 471–496. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00705.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Report for the European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Barca F., McCann P. and Rodriguez-Pose A. (2012) The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches, Journal of Regional Science 52, 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile R., Benfratello L. and Castellani D. (2012a) Geoadditive models for regional count data: an application to industrial location, Geographical Analysis 45, 28–48. doi:10.1111/gean.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile R., Capello R. and Caragliu A. (2012b) Technological interdependence and regional growth in Europe: proximity and synergy in knowledge spillovers, Papers in Regional Science 91, 697–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry C. and Schiffauerova A. (2009) Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate, Research Policy 38, 318–337. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand R., Pebesma E. J. and Gómez Rubio V. (2008) Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma R. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma R. and Frenken K. (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Toward an evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography 6, 273–302. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottazzi L. and Peri G. (2003) Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data, European Economic Review 47, 687–710. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi S. and Lissoni F. (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey, Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 975–1005. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Breschi S. and Lissoni F. (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows, Journal of Economic Geography 9, 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl M. S. and Pedersen C. O. R. (2004) Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality?, Research Policy 33, 1673–1686. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot H., Poot J. and Smit M. J. (2009) Agglomeration externalities, innovation and regional growth: theoretical perspectives and meta-analysis, in Nijkamp P. and Capello R. (Eds) Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, pp. 256–281. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Del Barrio-Castro T. and García-Quevedo J. (2005) Effects of university research on the geography of innovation, Regional Studies 39, 1217–1229. doi:10.1080/00343400500389992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deltas G. and Karkalakos S. (2013) Similarity of R&D activities, physical proximity and R&D spillovers, Regional Science and Urban Economics 43, 124–131. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogaru T., Van Oort F. and Thissen M. (2011) Agglomeration economies in European regions: perspectives for objective-1 regions, Tijdschrift voor Economische and Sociale Geografie 102, 486–494. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00676.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation. European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer M. and Varga A. (2003) Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: evidence from Austria, Annals of Regional Science 37, 303–322. doi:10.1007/s001680200115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J. (2008) Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch M. and Slavtchev V. (2005) The Role of Regional Knowledge Sources for Innovation? An Empirical Assessment. No. 2005, 15. Freiberger Arbeitspapiere, 2005. Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch M. and Slavtchev V. (2007) Universities and Innovation in Space, Industry and Innovation 14, 201–218. doi:10.1080/13662710701253466
   Google Scholar
• Geroski P. (1995) Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability, in Stoneman P. (Ed.) Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp. 90–131. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser E. L., Kallal H. D., Scheinkman J. A. and Schleifer A. (1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152. doi:10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greunz L. (2003) Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions, Annals of Regional Science 37, 657–680. doi:10.1007/s00168-003-0131-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe C. and Patuelli R. (2011) Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach, Annals of Regional Science 46, 519–541. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0355-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbau-Albert M. and Maudos J. (2009) Patents, technological inputs and spillovers among regions, Applied Economics 41, 1473–1486. doi: 10.1080/00036840601032250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J., Link A. N. and Vonortas N. S. (2000) Research partnerships, Research Policy 29, 567–586. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson J. V. (2003) Marshall's scale economies, Journal of Urban Economics 53, 1–28. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00505-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B. (1989) Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review 79, 957–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. and Henderson R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillover as evidence by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble D. and Wilkinson F. (1999) Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe, Regional Studies 33, 295–303. doi:10.1080/00343409950081167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux N. R. and Sokoloff K. L. (1999) Inventors, firms, and the market for technology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, in Lamoreaux N. R., Raff D. M. G. and Temin P. (Eds) Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, pp. 19–60. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• LeSage J. and Pace K. (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Lin G. and Zhang T. (2007) Loglinear residual tests of Moran's I autocorrelation and their applications to Kentucky breast cancer data, Geographical Analysis 39, 293–310. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00705.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrocu E., Paci R. and Usai S. (2012) Productivity growth in the old and new Europe: the role of agglomeration externalities, Journal of Regional Science 53, 418–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen D. P. (2003) Spatial autocorrelation or model misspecification?, International Regional Science Review 26, 208–217. doi:10.1177/0160017602250977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo P. C., Graham D. J. and Noland R. B. (2009) A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies, Regional Science and Urban Economics 39, 332–342. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno R., Paci R. and Usai S. (2005) Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions, Environment and Planning 37, 1793–1812. doi:10.1068/a37341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009a) How Regions Grow. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009b) Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Piergiovanni R. and Santarelli E. (2001) Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing, Regional Studies 35, 697–702. doi: 10.1080/00343400120101434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds R. (2008) Regional Innovation and the geography of research collaboration in science-based industries. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Ponds R., Van Oort F. and Frenken K. (2010) Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach, Journal of Economic Geography 10, 231–255. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappeiner G., Hauser C. and Walde J. (2008) Regional knowledge spillovers: fact or artifact?, Research Policy 37, 861–874. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort F. and Bosma N. (2013) Agglomeration economies, inventors and entrepreneurs as engines of European regional productivity, Annals of Regional Science 51, 213–244. doi: 10.1007/s00168-012-0547-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort F., Burger M., Knoben J. and Raspe O. (2012) Multilevel approaches and the firm-agglomeration ambiguity in economic growth studies, Journal of Economic Surveys 26, 468–491. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00723.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort F. and Lambooy J. (2013) Cities, knowledge and innovation, in Fischer M. and Nijkamp P. (Eds) Handbook of Regional Science, pp. 475–488. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Varga A., Pontikakis D. and Chorafakis G. (2012) Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity, Journal of Economic Geography 14, 229–263. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood S. (2006) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wood S. N. (2003) Thin plate regression splines, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 65, 95–114. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00374
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2009) World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar