Regional Importance of Mittelstand Firms and Innovation Performance

References

• Acs Z. J., Anselin L. and Varga A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy 31, 1069–1085. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo A. M. and Mur J. (2012) The likelihood ratio test of common factors under non-ideal conditions, Investigaciones Regionales 21, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin L. (1988a) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Studies in Operational Regional Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin L. (1988b) Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity, Geographical Analysis 20, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin L. and Florax R. (1995) Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models: some further results, in Anselin L. and Florax R. (Eds) New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, pp. 21–74. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Arvanitis S. (1997) The impact of firm size on innovative activity – an empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data, Small Business Economics 9, 473–490. doi:10.1023/A:1007920723585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Elston J. A. (1997) Financing the German Mittelstand, Small Business Economics 9, 97–110. doi:10.1023/A:1007963621438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B., Hülsbeck M. and Lehmann E. E. (2012) Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity, Small Business Economics 39, 587–601. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9332-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Keilbach M. (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship, Journal of Management Studies 44, 1242–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Keilbach M. (2008) Resolving the knowledge paradox: knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth, Research Policy 37, 1697–1705. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. and Vivarelli M. (1996) Firm size and R&D spillovers: evidence from Italy, Small Business Economics 8, 249–258. doi:10.1007/BF00388651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert T., Buesa M. and Heijs J. (2010) The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: a combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach, Research Policy 39, 722–735. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J. (2010) Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J., Litan R. E. and Schramm C. J. (2007) Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
   Google Scholar
• Berghoff H. (2006) The end of family business? The Mittelstand and German capitalism in transition, 1949–2000, Business History Review 80, 263–295. doi:10.1017/S0007680500035492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlemann M., Engelmann S., Lessmann C., Schmalholz H., Spelsberg H. and Weber H. (2007) Unternehmensnachfolge im sächsischen Mittelstand, ifo Dresden berichtet 14, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Berlemann M. and Jahn V. (2013) Relative innovative capacity of German regions: is East Germany still lagging behind?, CESifo Forum 14, 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bizer K. and Thomä J. (2013) To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector, Research Policy 42, 35–49. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone B. and Fuhrmans V. (2011) The engines of growth, Wall Street Journal 27 June.
   Google Scholar
• Block J. H. and Spiegel F. (2013) Family firm density and regional innovation output: an exploratory analysis, Journal of Family Business Strategy 4, 270–280. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner T. and Broekel T. (2011) Regional factors and innovativeness: an empirical analysis of four German industries, Annals of Regional Science 47, 169–194. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0364-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cáceres R., Guzmán J. and Rekowski M. (2011) Firms as source of variety in innovation: influence of size and sector, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 7, 357–372. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0198-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki D. and Kraft K. (2004) Management control and innovative activity, Review of Industrial Organization 24, 1–24. doi:10.1023/B:REIO.0000031361.27597.7c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn E. S. Jr (1960) A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis, Papers in Regional Science 6, 97–112. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01705.x
   Google Scholar
• Eckey H.-F., Kosfeld R. and Tuerck M. (2007) Regionale Entwicklung mit und ohne räumliche Spillover-Effekte, Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 27, 23–42. doi:10.1007/s10037-006-0007-y
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst J. P. (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar, Spatial Economic Analysis 5, 9–28. doi:10.1080/17421770903541772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhorst J. P. (2014) Spatial Econometrics. From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst J. P. and Vega S. H. (2013) On spatial econometric models, spillover effects, and W. ERSA Conference Papers No. ersa13p222 (available at: www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa13/ERSA2013_paper_00222.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Esteban-Marquillas J. M. (1972) Shift and share analysis revisited, Regional and Urban Economics 2, 249–255. doi:10.1016/0034-3331(72)90033-4
   Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir L., Kneib T., Lang S. and Marx B. (2013) Regression – Models, Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Fama E. F. and Jensen M. C. (1983) Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301–325. doi:10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fear J. (2014) The secret behind Germany's thriving ‘Mittelstand’ businesses is all in the mindset, The Conversation 28 April.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (2013) German Mittelstand: Engine of the German Economy. Facts and Figures about Small and Medium-Sized German Firms. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of German Industries (2012) The Industrial ‘Mittelstand’ in Germany. For Growth and Employment in Europe. Federation of German Industries, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Fehl U. (1988) Optimale Unternehmensgröße versus Vielfalt von Unternehmensgrößen. Einige grundsätzliche Überlegungen zu einem alten Thema, in Klaus J. and Klemmer P. (Eds) Wirtschaftliche Strukturprobleme und soziale Fragen – Analyse und Gestaltungsaufgaben. J. Heinz Müller zum 70. Geburtstag, pp. 343–353. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer M. M. and LeSage J. P. (2008) Spatial growth regressions: model specification, estimation and interpretation, Spatial Economic Analysis 3, 275–304. doi:10.1080/17421770802353758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke G. and Fritsch M. (2004) Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R & D cooperation, Research Policy 33, 245–255. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00123-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) (2012) Forschungsstarker Mittelstand stützt die deutsche Konjunktur. Press Release, 27 September. DIW, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Giotra K. and Netessine S. (2013) Extreme focus and the success of Germany's Mittelstand, Harvard Business Review 12 February.
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch K. S. and Ward M. D. (2007) An Introduction to Spatial Regression Models in the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and University of Essex, Colchester (available at: https://web.duke.edu/methods/pdfs/SRMmaster.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Goto A., Motohashi K. and Nagaoka S. (2010) Patent statistics as an innovation indicator, in Hall B. H. and Rosenberg N. (Eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 2, pp. 1083–1127. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B. (1989) Agency costs and innovation, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12, 305–327. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icks A. (2006) Der Mittelstand in Deutschland. Paper presented at the meeting of the group ‘Mittelstand' of the initiative Neue Qualität der Arbeit (INQA), Berlin, Germany, 12 June 2006.
   Google Scholar
• IfM Bonn (2013a) Innovationstätigkeit von Familienunternehmen. IfM-Materialien No. 225. IfM Bonn, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• IfM Bonn (2013b) Der deutsche Mittelstand: Ein Konglomerat verschiedenartiger Unternehmen. IfM Standpunkt No. 1. IfM Bonn, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• IfM Bonn (2015) SME-Definition of IfM Bonn (available at: http://en.ifm-bonn.org/definitions/sme-definition-of-ifm-bonn).
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values, American Economic Review 76, 984–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen M. and Meckling W. (2009) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, in Kroszner R. S. and Putterman L. (Eds) The Economic Nature of the Firm, 3rd Edn, pp. 283–303. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Keilbach M. C. (2000) Spatial Knowledge Spillovers and the Dynamics of Agglomeration and Regional Growth. Physica, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft K. (1989) Market structure, firm characteristics and innovative activity, Journal of Industrial Economics 37, 329–336. doi:10.2307/2098619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerbs O. W. and Oberst C. A. (2014) Explaining the spatial variation in homeownership rates: results for German regions, Regional Studies 48, 844–865. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.685464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage J. P. and Pace R. K. (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Lybbert T. J. and Zolas N. J. (2014) Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: an ‘algorithmic links with probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity, Research Policy 43, 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maaß F. and Führmann B. (2012) Innovationstätigkeit im Mittelstand. IfM-Materialien No. 212. IfM Bonn, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel A. (2009) Mittelstand – Rückgrat der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Video Podcast, 18 July (available at: http://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/Content/DE/Podcast/2009/2009-07-18-Video-Podcast/2009-07-18-video-podcast.html).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs of North Rhine Westphalia (2014) Daten und Fakten (available at: http://www.wirtschaft.nrw.de/mittelstand/mittelstandspolitik/daten_und_fakten/index.php).
   Google Scholar
• Moser P. (2013) Patents and innovation: evidence from economic history, Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, 23–44. doi:10.1257/jep.27.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser P. and Voena A. (2012) Compulsory licensing: evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act, American Economic Review 102, 396–427. doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker S. C. (2011) Small firms and innovation, in Audretsch D. B., Falck O., Heblich S. and Lederer A. (Eds) Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 357–364. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Paust S. (2014) The German Mittelstand – a model for Asia's emerging economies?, Asia Pathways 20 June.
   Google Scholar
• Pfirrmann O. (1994) The geography of innovation in small and medium-sized firms in West Germany, Small Business Economics 6, 41–54. doi:10.1007/BF01066111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piergiovanni R. and Santarelli E. (2001) Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing, Regional Studies 35, 697–702. doi:10.1080/00343400120101434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putterman L. (2009) Ownership and the nature of the firm, in Kroszner R. S. and Putterman L. (Eds) The Economic Nature of the Firm, 3rd Edn, pp. 353–361. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbach J. and Zimmermann K. F. (1991) A Poisson model of patenting and firm structure in Germany, in Acs Z. J. and Audretsch B. (Eds) Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison, pp. 109–120. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Seldadyo H., Elhorst J. P. and de Haan J. (2010) Geography and governance: does space matter?, Papers in Regional Science 89, 625–640. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studzinski J. (2013) Germany is right: there is no right to profit, but the right to work is essential, The Guardian 6 February.
   Google Scholar
• Tchouvakhina M. and Schwartz M. (2013) Auf die Vielfalt kommt es an: Deutscher Mittelstand im europäischen Vergleich. Fokus Volkswirtschaft No. 24. KfW Bankengruppe. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter H.-J. and Hauser H.-E. (2001) Die Bedeutung des Eigentümerunternehmens in Deutschland – Eine Auseinandersetzung mit der qualitativen und quantitativen Definition des Mittelstands, in Jahrbuch für Mittelstandsforschung 1/2001, Schriften zur Mittelstandsforschung No. 90 NF, pp. 25–77. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Wong C. and Kohn R. (1996) A Bayesian approach to additive semiparametric regression, Journal of Econometrics 74, 209–235. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(95)01743-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood S. (2000) Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 62, 413–428. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood S. (2006) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wood S. (2011) mgcv: GAMs with GCV/AIC/REML Smoothness Estimation and GAMMs by PQL, R Package Version 1.7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zuur A. F., Ieno E. N., Walker N. J., Saveliev A. A. and Smith G. M. (2008) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar