The influence of decentralized taxes and intergovernmental grants on local spending volatility

REFERENCES

• Afonso, A., Agnello, L., & Furceri, D. (2010). Fiscal policy responsiveness, persistence and discretion. Public Choice, 145, 503–530. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9577-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, A., & Furceri, D. (2010). Government size, composition, volatility and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 517–532. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, B. (2011). Fiscal institutions and public spending volatility in Europe. Economic Modelling, 28, 2544–2559. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2011.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, country size and government. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 305–321. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J., Buschman, R. D., & Sjoquist, D. L. (2011). Rethinking local government reliance on the property tax. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 320–331. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, J., Galli, E., & Padovano, F. (2013). Decentralization as a constraint to Leviathan: A panel cointegration analysis. Public Choice, 156, 491–516. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-9962-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. E., Brunori, D., & Youngman, J. M. (2010). The property tax and local autonomy. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, R. M., & Slack, E. (2013). Local taxes and local expenditures: Strengthening the Wicksellian connection. Working Paper Series AYSPS GSU, Paper No. 1323. Atlanta: International Center for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1329–1368. doi:10.1162/003355302320935043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., & Temple, J. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Economics Papers No. 2001-W21. Oxford: Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bordignon, M., & Minelli, E. (2001). Rules transparency and political accountability. Journal of Public Economics, 80, 73–98. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00109-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, L. E., & Rattsø, J. (2008). Property taxation as incentive for cost control: empirical evidence for utility services in Norway. European Economic Review, 52, 1035–1054. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1978). Tax instruments as constraints on the disposition of public revenues. Journal of Public Economics, 9, 301–318. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(78)90013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunetti, A. (1998). Policy volatility and economic growth: A comparative, empirical analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 35–52. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00039-6
   Google Scholar
• Brunori, D. (2003). Local tax policy: A federalist perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, M., & Siwinska-Gorzelak, J. (2010). The impact of fiscal rules on fiscal policy volatility. Journal of Applied Economics, 13, 205–231. doi:10.1016/S1514-0326(10)60010-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, M., & Hoxby, C. (2012). The hated property tax: Salience, tax rates, and tax revolts. NBER Working Paper No. 18514. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Cassette, A., & Paty, S. (2010). Fiscal decentralization and the size of government: A European country empirical analysis. Public Choice, 143, 173–189. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9496-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbit, C. (2010). Explaining the sub-national tax–grants balance in OECD countries. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism No. 11. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publ..
   Google Scholar
• Devarajan, S., Khemani, S., & Shah, S. (2009). The politics of partial decentralization. In E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Eds), Does decentralization enhance service delivery and poverty reduction? (pp. 79–101). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K., & Weibull, J. W. (2007). Political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 7351–7356. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702071104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerner, W. M., & Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2011). House prices and city revenues. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 332–342. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 549–560. doi:10.1162/003465398557825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatás, A., & Mihov, I. (2003). The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1419–1447. doi:10.1162/003355303322552838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatás, A., & Mihov, I. (2005). Policy volatility, institutions and economic growth. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5388. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, R., & Levy, G. (2008). Diversity and redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 925–943. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippetti, A., & Sacchi, A. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of institutional setting (available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2373164).
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (2001). Homevoters, municipal corporate governance, and the benefit view of the property tax. National Tax Journal, 54, 157–174. doi:10.17310/ntj.2001.1.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiva, J. H. (2006). New evidence on the effect of fiscal decentralization on the size and composition of government spending. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 62, 250–280. doi:10.1628/001522106X120659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiva, J. H., & Rønning, M. (2008). The incentive effects of property taxation: Evidence from Norwegian school districts. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38, 49–62. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2007.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foremny, D. (2014). Sub-national deficits in European countries: The impact of fiscal rules and tax autonomy. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 86–110. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furceri, D. (2007). Is government expenditure volatility harmful for growth? A cross-country analysis. Fiscal Studies, 28, 103–120. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furceri, D., & Karras, G. (2008). Business cycle volatility and country size: Evidence for a sample of OECD countries. Economics Bulletin, 5, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Furceri, D., & Poplawski-Ribeiro, M. P. (2009). Government consumption volatility and the size of nations. OECD Working Paper No. 28. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Furceri, D., Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2014). Can fiscal decentralization alleviate government consumption volatility? MPRA Working Paper No. 54683. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA).
   Google Scholar
• Furceri, D., & Zdzienicka, A. (2012). Financial integration and fiscal policy. Open Economies Review, 23, 805–822. doi:10.1007/s11079-011-9236-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry, 51, 1915–1931. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00508.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giertz, J. F. (2006). The property tax bound. National Tax Journal, 59, 695–705. doi:10.17310/ntj.2006.3.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golem, S. (2010). Fiscal decentralisation and the size of government: A review of the empirical literature. Financial Theory and Practice, 34, 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, L., & Zou, H. F. (2002). Effects of growth and volatility in public expenditures on economic growth: Theory and evidence. Annals of Economics and Finance, 3, 379–406.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, G. W., & Tosun, M. S. (2011). The impact of local decentralization on economic growth: Evidence from U.S. counties. Journal of Regional Science, 51, 47–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00683.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbers, I. (2009). Decentralization and the development of nationalized party systems in new democracies: Evidence from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 606–627. doi:10.1177/0010414008330285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. D., & Gibson, C. C. (2005). Fiscal governance and public services: Evidence from Tanzania and Zambia. August. Department of Political Science, University of California – San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Schakel, A. H. (2008). Measuring regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies, 18, 111–121. doi:10.1080/13597560801979464
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Chapman, S., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2015). A postfunctionalist theory of governance, Vol. I: Measuring regional authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacome, L. I., Sedik, T. S., & Townsend, S. (2012). Can emerging market central banks bail out banks? A cautionary tale from Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 13, 424–448. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. P., & Mainwaring, S. (2003). The nationalization of parties and party systems: an empirical measure and an application to the Americas. Party Politics, 9, 139–166. doi:10.1177/13540688030092002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karras, G., & Furceri, D. (2009). Taxes and growth in Europe. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 2, 181–204.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M., & Loughlin, J. (1996). The political economy of regionalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khemani, S. (2010). Decentralization by politicians: Creation of grants-financed local jurisdictions. In Bosch, N., Espasa, M., & Sole-Ollé, A. (Eds), The political economy of regional fiscal flows. Measurement, determinants and effects on country stability (pp. 227–248). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. (1984). Fiscal Tiers – The economics of multi-level government. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Penas, I., & Lago-Penas, S. (2009). Does the nationalization of party systems affect the composition of public spending? Economics of Governance, 10, 85–98. doi:10.1007/s10101-008-0051-x
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Penas, S., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Sacchi, A. (2015). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. GEN Working Paper No. A 2015–5. Vigo: Governance and Economics Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, P. R. (2003). The cyclical behaviour of fiscal policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2661–2675. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00075-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati, P., & Sacchi, A. (2013). Tax decentralization and local government size. Public Choice, 157, 183–205. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-9937-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loayza, N. V., Ranciere, R., Servén, L., & Ventura, J. (2007). Macroeconomic volatility and welfare in developing countries: an introduction. World Bank Economic Review, 21, 343–357. doi:10.1093/wber/lhm017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz, J. (2006). Local government organization and finance: Nordic countries. In Shah, A. (Ed.), Local governance in industrial countries (pp. 223–264). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, B., Molloy, R., & Shan, H. (2011). The housing crisis and state and local government tax revenue: Five channels. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 306–319. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madariaga, N., & Poncet, S. (2007). FDI in Chinese cities: Spillovers and impact on growth. World Economy, 30, 837–862. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31, 1597–1616. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00109-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey, W. J., Cornia, G. C., & Walters, L. C. (2012). A primer on property tax: Administration and policy. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McLure, C., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2000). The assignment of revenues and expenditures in intergovernmental fiscal relations. Paper prepared for the core course on Intergovernmental Relations and Local Financial Management, World Bank Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. (1983). Who should tax, where and what? In McLure, C. E. (Ed.), Tax assignment in federal countries (pp. 2–19). Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Norregaard, M. J. (2013). Taxing immovable property revenue potential and implementation challenges. IMF Working Papers No. 13/129. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (2001). Property taxation and local government finance: an overview and some reflections. In W. E. Oates (Ed.), Property taxation and local government finance (pp. 21–31). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1999). Taxing Powers of State and Local Government. OECD Tax Policy Studies No. 1. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Intergovernmental transfers and decentralised public spending. Working Paper No. 3. OECD Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009a). Taxes and grants: On the revenue mix of sub-central governments. Working Paper No. 7. Paris: OCED Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009b). The spending power of sub-central governments: A Pilot Study. Paris: OECD Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government. COM/CTPA/ECO/GOV/WP No. 8. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). Decentralization and economic growth. Note by the Secretariat. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Faculty of Economics, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Presbitero, A. F., Sacchi, A., & Zazzaro, A. (2014). Property tax and fiscal discipline in OECD countries. Economics Letters, 124, 428–433. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 670–687. doi:10.2307/3088407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization, 57, 695–730. doi:10.1017/S0020818303574021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2005). On the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution. Regional Studies, 39, 405–420. doi:10.1080/00343400500128390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032. doi:10.1086/250038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, D. A. (2008). Decentralization, territorial power and the state: A critical response. Development and Change, 21, 491–500. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1990.tb00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to ‘difference' and ‘system' GMM in Stata, Stata Journal 9, 86–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989). Government spending and budget deficits in the industrial countries. Economic Policy, 4, 99–132. doi:10.2307/1344465
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2014). A comprehensive analysis of expenditure decentralization and of the composition of local public spending. Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.893387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, E., & Bird, R. (2014). The political economy of property tax reform. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism No. 18. Paris: OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Sorens, J. (2014). Does fiscal federalism promote regional inequality? An empirical analysis of the OECD, 1980–2005. Regional Studies, 48, 239–253. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.661851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, E. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. Journal of Applied Economics, 2, 357–391.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424. doi:10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vammalle, C., & Hulbert, C. (2013). Sub-national finances and fiscal consolidation: Walking on thin ice. OECD Regional Development Working Papers No. 2013/02. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, L. G., & Pinho, M. M. (2007). The political economy of intergovernmental grants: Evidence from a maturing democracy. Public Choice, 133, 457–477. doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9208-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 279–293. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. (2014). Second generation fiscal federalism: Political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development, 53, 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar