Regional inequalities, fiscal decentralization and government quality

REFERENCES

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ades, A., & Di Tella, R. (1999). Rents, competition and corruption. American Economic Review, 89, 982–993. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.4.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2003). The size of nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011). Segregation and the quality of government in a cross-section of countries. American Economic Review, 101, 1872–1911. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.5.1872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. W. K. (1991). Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica, 59, 817–858. doi: 10.2307/2938229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., Gerber, M., Leimgruber, P., & Beyeler, M. (2011). Comparative political data set 1960–2009. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157–1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, R. (1977). Error components and seemingly unrelated regressions. Econometrica, 45, 199–209. doi: 10.2307/1913296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H. (1981). Simultaneous equations with error components. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 189–200. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(81)90026-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of government and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 185–205. doi: 10.1257/089533002320951037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralization, corruption and government accountability: an overview. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 161–188). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1009850119329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. (2001). Human capital and growth. American Economic Review, 91, 12–17. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.2.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R., & Lee, J. (2001). International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 541–563. doi: 10.1093/oep/53.3.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzi, S., & Clemens, M. (2013). Blunt instruments: avoiding common pitfalls in identifying the causes of economic growth. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 5, 152–186. doi: 10.1257/mac.5.2.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beramendi, P. (2007). Inequality and the territorial fragmentation of solidarity. International Organization, 61, 783–820. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorn, E., & Krishnakumar, J. (2008). Measurement errors and simultaneity. In L. Mátyás, & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data. Fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice (pp. 323–367). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The power to tax. Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H., & Treisman, D. (2004). State corroding federalism. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 819–843. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00220-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, H., & Treisman, D. (2005). Does competition for capital discipline government? Decentralization, globalization and public policy. American Economic Review, 95, 817–830. doi: 10.1257/0002828054201314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata (revd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Rothstein, B. (2013). Quality of government and corruption from a European perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, J. (2010). Does devolution lead to regional inequalities in welfare activity? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 435–449. doi: 10.1068/c09156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2261–2290. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra, R. (2012). Is there a link between globalization and governance? Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy, 30, 848–870. doi: 10.1068/c11234r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra, R., & Pascual, P. (2008). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: evidence from several European Union countries. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1185–1201. doi: 10.1068/a39195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2014). Government quality and spatial inequality: a cross-country analysis. Environment and Planning A, 46, 1732–1753. doi: 10.1068/a130046p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 14–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 325–345. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry, 51, 1915–1931. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00508.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannetti, M. (2002). The effects of integration on regional disparities: convergence, divergence or both? European Economic Review, 46, 539–567. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00166-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, C., Pascual, P., & Rapun, M. (2004). Regional economic disparities and decentralization. Urban Studies, 41, 71–95. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000155696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The injustice of Inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 199–222. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00204-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Jones, C. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83–116. doi: 10.1162/003355399555954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, F. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2014). How close is your government to its people? Worldwide indicators on localization and decentralization. Economics: Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8, 1–61. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., Yingyi, Q., & Weingast, B. (2005). Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism Chinese style. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1719–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 33–53. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmenta, J. (1997). Elements of econometrics (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, A. (2012). Ethnic segregation and the quality of government: the importance of regional diversity. Constitutional Political Economy, 23, 166–180. doi: 10.1007/s10602-012-9118-3
   Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, A., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2011a). Fiscal and political decentralization and government quality. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 204–223. doi: 10.1068/c1016r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, A., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2011b). Fiscal decentralization and government quality in the OECD. Economics Letters, 111, 191–193. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, A., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2012). The impact of EU structural funds on regional disparities within member states. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 267–281. doi: 10.1068/c11140r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, A., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2014). Regional disparities and government quality: redistributive conflict crowds out good government. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9, 183–201. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2014.891158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, A., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: the importance of good governance. Papers in Regional Science, 94, 89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279. doi: 10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessmann, C. (2009). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparity: evidence from cross section and panel data. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2455–2473. doi: 10.1068/a41296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessmann, C. (2012). Regional inequality and decentralization: an empirical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1363–1388. doi: 10.1068/a44267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letelier, L. (2005). Explaining fiscal decentralization. Public Finance Review, 33, 155–183. doi: 10.1177/1091142104270910
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Kim, D., Huang, H., & Yeh, C. (2009). Nonlinearity between inequality and growth. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics Econometrics, 13, Article 3. doi: 10.2202/1558-3708.1635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankiw, G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437. doi: 10.2307/2118477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyas, L. (1999). Generalized method of moments estimation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712. doi: 10.2307/2946696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, R. (1997). Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the American monetary union. In M. Blejer, & T. Ter-Minassian (Eds.), Macroeconomic dimensions of public finance: Essays in honour of Vito Tanzi (pp. 73–93). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semidefinite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 56, 203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. (1993). Fiscal decentralization and economic development. National Tax Journal, 46, 237–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149. doi: 10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panizza, U. (1999). On the determinants of fiscal centralization: theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 97–139. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrakos, G. (2001). Patterns of regional inequality in transition economies. European Planning Studies, 9, 359–383. doi: 10.1080/09654310120037621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrakos, G., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Rovolis, A. (2005). Growth, integration and regional disparities in the European Union. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1837–1855. doi: 10.1068/a37348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prud'homme, R. (1995). On the dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10, 201–220. doi: 10.1093/wbro/10.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., & Roland, G. (1998). Federalism and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review, 88, 1143–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. (1997). Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 83–92. doi: 10.1257/jep.11.4.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization. On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36, 481–500. doi: 10.2307/4150172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (1997). Does federalism preserve markets? Virginia Law Review, 83, 1521–1572. doi: 10.2307/1073767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). Trade and regional inequality. Economic Geography, 88, 109–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2010). Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 619–644. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2004). Is there a global link between regional disparities and devolution? Environment and Planning A, 36, 2097–2117. doi: 10.1068/a362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2014a). How regional inequality affects fiscal decentralisation: accounting for the autonomy of subcentral governments. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 144–162. doi: 10.1068/c1241r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2014b). A comprehensive analysis of expenditure decentralization and the composition of local public spending. Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.893387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seldayo, H., Elhorst, J., & De Haan, J. (2010). Geography and governance: does space matter? Papers in Regional Science, 89, 625–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 599–617. doi: 10.2307/2118402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegarescu, D. (2005). Public sector decentralization: measurement concepts and recent international trends. Fiscal Studies, 26, 301–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegarescu, D. (2009). The effects of economic and political integration on fiscal decentralization: evidence from OECD countries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 694–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world – causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff Papers – International Monetary Fund, 45, 559–594. doi: 10.2307/3867585
   Google Scholar
• Tanzi, V. (2000). On fiscal federalism: issues to worry about. Paper presented at the World Bank Conference on Fiscal Decentralisation, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Theil, H. (1967). Economics and information theory. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Theil, H. (1971). Principles of econometrics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399–457. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijckeghem, C., & Weder, B. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much? Journal of Development Economics, 65, 307–331. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00139-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth? Distinguishing between the effects of inequality in different parts of the income distribution. Journal of Economic Growth, 10, 273–296. doi: 10.1007/s10887-005-3535-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, J. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). Decentralization in the public sector: an empirical study of state and local government. In H. S. Rosen (Ed.), Studies in fiscal federalism (pp. 5–32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheare, K. C. (1964). Federal government. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: a description of patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13, 1–84. doi: 10.1086/450136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (1999/2000). Entering the 21st century. World development report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• You, J., & Khagram, S. (2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70, 136–157. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner, A., & Theil, H. (1962). Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 30, 54–78. doi: 10.2307/1911287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuravskaya, E. (2000). Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal federalism, Russian style. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 337–368. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00090-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar