Are knowledge flows all alike? Evidence from European regions

REFERENCES

• Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. (1999). The microdynamics of technological change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173. doi:10.2307/2295952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile, R., & Usai, S. (2012). Analysis of regional endogenous growth. In C. Karlsson, M. Andersson, & T. Norman (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in economic geography, pp. 234–258. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Belenzon, S., & Schankerman, M. (2013). Spreading the word: Geography, policy and knowledge spillovers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 884–903. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 975–1005. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 439–468.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelli, R., & Montobbio, F. (2016). European integration and knowledge flows across European regions. Regional Studies, 50, 709–727. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.931572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrincazeaux, C., & Coris, M. (2011). Proximity and Innovation. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, & R. Boschma (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth, pp. 269–281. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., & Crespi, F. (2008). Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecological Economics, 66(2–3), 447–460. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211–253. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., & Verspagen, B. (2008). Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37(10), 1892–1908. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). COM(2012)-341, Final communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘A European strategy for key enabling technologies – A bridge to growth and jobs’. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. (1994a). The geography of innovation. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. (1994b). Knowledge complementarity and innovation. Small Business Economics, 6(3), 363–372. doi:10.1007/BF01065139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2004). The economics of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Fogarty, M. S., & Banks, B. A. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 183–205. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafourcade, M., & Paluzie, E. (2011). European integration, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the geography of French trade. Regional Studies, 45(4), 419–439. doi:10.1080/00343401003713357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A., Uberti, T. E., & Usai, S. (2011). Treating patents as relational data: knowledge transfers and spillovers across Italian provinces. Industry and Innovation, 18, 39–67. doi:10.1080/13662716.2010.528928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., & Guellec, D. (2008). The OECD REGPAT database: A presentation (OECD STI Working Papers No. 2008/2). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2013). Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1484–1498. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531–545. doi:10.1111/1467-9442.00300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, J. (1952). A geometry of international trade. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). OECD patent statistics manual. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2009). Knowledge flows across European regions. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 669–690. doi:10.1007/s00168-008-0256-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picci, L. (2010). The internationalization of inventive activity: A gravity model using patent data. Research Policy, 39, 1070–1081. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P. (1998). On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 843–856. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00066-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmueller, W. E. (2000). Will new information and communication technologies improve the ‘codification’ of knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 361–376. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.361
   Google Scholar
• Strumsky, D., Lobo, J., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2012). Using patent technology codes to study technological change. Economics of New Technology and Innovation, 21(3), 267–286. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.578709
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2006). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 383–388. doi:10.1162/rest.88.2.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95(1), 450–460. doi:10.1257/0002828053828509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viner, J. (1932). Cost curves and supply curves. Zeitschrift für Nationalokonomie, 3, 23–46. doi:10.1007/BF01316299
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1994). ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429–439. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar