8,498
Views
289
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies

, , &
Pages 31-45 | Received 27 Jun 2016, Accepted 26 Oct 2016, Published online: 05 Jan 2017

REFERENCES

  • Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521–543. doi:10.1002/smj.176
  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.
  • Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604–633. doi: 10.2307/2393511
  • Andriani, P., & Cattani, G. (2016). Exaptation as source of creativity, innovation, and diversity: Introduction to the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25, 115–131. doi:10.1093/icc/dtv053
  • Andriani, P., & Cohen, J. (2013). From exaptation to radical niche construction in biological and technological complex systems. Complexity, 18, 7–14. doi:10.1002/cplx.21450
  • Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems. The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
  • Bahar, D., Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2014). Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion? Journal of International Economics, 92, 111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.11.001
  • Baker, T., Miner, A. S., Dale, B., & Eesley, T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32, 255–276. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00099-9
  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
  • Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13, 653–676. doi:10.1177/1350508406067008
  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107. doi: 10.1080/19416520903053598
  • Berge, M. van den, & Weterings, A. (2014). Relatedness in eco-technological development in European regions. The Hague: Planbureau voor Leefomgeving.
  • Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003
  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407–429. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
  • Binz, C., Harris-Lovett, S., Kiparsky, M., Sedlak, D. L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The thorny road to technology legitimation. Institutional work for potable water reuse in California. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 249–263. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems – Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43, 138–155. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring. Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92, 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
  • Boschma, R. (1997). New industries and windows of locational opportunity. A long-term analysis of Belgium. Erdkunde, 51, 12–22.
  • Boschma, R. (Forthcoming 2016). Relatedness as driver behind regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
  • Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24, 223–250. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtu012
  • Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44, 1902–1914. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an Evolutionary Economic Geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273–302. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbi022
  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2009). Some notes on institutions in Evolutionary Economic Geography. Economic Geography, 85, 151–158. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01018.x
  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory. Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge.
  • Boschma, R., Heimeriks, G., & Balland, P.-A. (2014). Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy, 43, 107–114. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.009
  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2013). The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product-relatedness. Economic Geography, 89, 29–51. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x
  • Buenstorf, G., & Klepper, S. (2009). Heritage and agglomeration: The Akron tyre cluster revisited. Economic Journal, 119, 705–733. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02216.x
  • Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
  • Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 244–269). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs. An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49, 767–781. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
  • Coe, N. M. (2011). Geographies of production I: An evolutionary revolution? Progress in Human Geography, 35, 81–91. doi:10.1177/0309132510364281
  • Coenen, L., Asheim, B. T., Bugge, M., & Herstad, S. J. (2016). Advancing regional innovation systems: What does Evolutionary Economic Geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy. doi:10.1177/0263774X16646583
  • Coenen, L., Hansen, T., & Rekers, J. V. (2015). Innovation policy for grand challenges. An economic geography perspective. Geography Compass, 9, 483–496. doi:10.1111/gec3.12231
  • Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Martin, H. (2015). Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies, 49, 850–865. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.979321
  • Coenen, L., Raven, R., & Verbong, G. (2010). Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages. Technology in Society, 32, 295–302. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006
  • Coenen, L., & Truffer, B. (2012). Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: Geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field. European Planning Studies, 20, 367–374. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651802
  • Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2014). The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy, 43, 1681–1696. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008
  • Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Van Oort, F. (2016). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 16.10). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
  • Crespo, J., Suire R., & Vicente J. (2014). Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 199–219. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbt006
  • Crouch, C., & Voelzkow, H. (2009). Innovation in local economies: Germany in comparative context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90, 91–112. doi:10.1111/ecge.12028
  • Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 257–272. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu036
  • De Jong, M., Lalenis, K., & Mamadouh, V. D. (Eds.) (2002). The theory and practice of institutional transplantation. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2016). Exaptation and niche construction: Behavioral insights for an evolutionary theory. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25, 167–179. doi:10.1093/icc/dtv051
  • Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). The economic implications of exaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 69–84. doi: 10.1007/s00191-003-0180-x
  • Dewald, U., & Truffer, B. (2012). The local sources of market formation: Explaining regional growth differentials in German photovoltaic markets. European Planning Studies, 20, 397–420. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651803
  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147–162. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  • Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C.-C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31, 133–151. doi:10.1177/0170840609347051
  • Essleztbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49, 752–766. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.806793
  • Feldman, M. P., Kogler, D. F., & Rigby, D. L. (2015). rKnowledge: The spatial diffusion and adoption of rDNA methods. Regional Studies, 49, 798–817. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.980799
  • Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Mastrogiorgio, A., & Mastrogiorgio, M. (2016). Factor markets, actors, and affordances. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25, 133–147. doi:10.1093/icc/dtv049
  • Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological space. Management Science, 47, 117–132. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
  • Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation – The concept (Knowledge Economists Policy Brief No. 9). Brussels: European Commission.
  • Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialisation From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation (MTEI-WORKING_PAPER-2011-001). Lausanne: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL).
  • Frantzeskaki, N., Castan-Broto, V., Coenen, L., & Loorbach, D. (Eds.) (2016). Urban sustainability transitions. London: Routledge.
  • Frenken K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 635–649. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm018
  • Frenken, K., van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296
  • Fuenfschilling, L., & Binz, C. (2016). Global socio-technical regimes. Paper presented at the 50th SPRU Anniversary Conference, Brighton, UK, 7–9 September 2016.
  • Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes – Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43, 772–791. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
  • Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems. An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 298–312. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023
  • Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2016). Technological exaptation: A narrative approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25, 149–166. doi:10.1093/icc/dtv050
  • Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957–969. doi:10.1177/0170840607078958
  • Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277–300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
  • Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 760–774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  • Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20, 521–536. doi:10.1080/09537320802292982
  • Geels, F. W., Kemp, R., Dudley, G., & Lyons, G. (Eds.) (2012). Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. New York: Routledge.
  • Geels, F. W., & Raven, R. (2006). Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18, 375–392. doi:10.1080/09537320600777143
  • Gertler, M. S. (2004). Manufacturing culture: The institutional geography of industrial practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Giddens, A. T. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties – The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm. (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
  • Grin, J., Rotmans J., & Schot, J. (2011). On patterns and agency in transition dynamics: Some key insights from the KSI programme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 76–81. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.008
  • Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92–109. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
  • Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13, 521–535. doi:10.1080/09654310500107134
  • Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., & Marques, P. (2014). Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by engaged pluralism. Regional Studies, 48, 1295–1307. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.889815
  • Heimeriks, G., & Balland, P.-A. (2015). How smart is specialisation? An analysis of specialisation patterns in knowledge production. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv061
  • Heimeriks, G., & Boschma, R. (2014). The path- and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986–2008. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 339–364. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs052
  • Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
  • Henderson, D. (2000). EU regional innovation strategies: regional experimentalism in practice? European Urban and Regional Studies, 7, 347–358. doi:10.1177/096977640000700404
  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space and its consequences for economic growth. Science, 317, 482–487. doi:10.1126/science.1144581
  • Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport. The approach of strategic niche management. London: Spon.
  • Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2014). Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis (Papers in Innovation Studies No. 2014/17). Lund: Lund University, Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE).
  • Karnøe, P., & Garud, R. (2012). Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies, 20, 733–752. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667923
  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 175–198. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310
  • Klepper, S. (2002). The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 645–666. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.4.645
  • Klepper, S. (2007). Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science, 53, 616–631. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683
  • Kogler, D. F. (2015). Editorial: Evolutionary Economic Geography – Theoretical and empirical progress. Regional Studies, 49, 705–711. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1033178
  • Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in U.S. cities. European Planning Studies, 21, 1374–1391. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1967). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., & McMaster, R. (2009). Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography, 85, 129–150. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x
  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
  • Martin, R. (2010). Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography – Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
  • Martin, R., & Sunley P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012
  • Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state. Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthern.
  • Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Morgan, K. (2013). Path dependence and the state: The politics of novelty in old industrial regions. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Reframing regional development: Evolution, innovation, transition (pp. 318–340). London: Routledge.
  • Morgan, K., & Henderson, D. (2002). Regions as laboratories: The rise of regional experimentalism in Europe. In M. Gertler & D. Wolfe (Eds.), Innovation and social learning: Institutional adaptation in an era of technological change (pp. 204–226). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Murphy, J. T. (2015). Human geography and socio-technical Transition Studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 73–91. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002
  • Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2014). Agents of structural change. The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 14.10. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
  • Neffke F., Henning M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87, 237–265. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  • Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6, 36–76. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
  • Quatraro, F., & Montresor, S. (2015). Key enabling technologies and smart specialization strategies. Regional evidence from European patent data. Paper presented at the annual DRUID conference, Rome, Italy.
  • Quitzow, R. (2015). Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 126–148. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.002
  • Rigby, D. L. (2015). Technological relatedness and knowledge space. Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies, 49, 1922–1937. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.854878
  • Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change. Resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Columbus: Battelle.
  • Sabel, C. F. (1996). A measure of federalism: Assessing manufacturing technology centers. Research Policy, 25, 281–307. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00851-9
  • Saviotti, P. P., & Frenken, K. (2008). Export variety and the economic performance of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 201–218. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5
  • Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20, 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651
  • Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (1987). High technology industry and regional development. A theoretical critique and reconstruction. International Social Science Journal, 112, 215–232.
  • Sengers, F., & Raven, R. (2015). Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of bus rapid transit. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 166–182. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.003
  • Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new path creation in renewable energy technologies. European Planning Studies, 20, 729–731. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667922
  • Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 123–155. doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.123
  • Smil, V. (2006). Transforming the twentieth century: Technical innovations and their consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
  • Sotarauta, M., & R. Pulkkinen (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C, 29, 96–112. doi:10.1068/c1066r
  • Spaargaren, G., Oosterveer, P., & Loeber, A. (Eds.) (2012). Food practices in transition: Changing food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity. New York: Routledge.
  • Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Local demonstrations for global transitions. Dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change towards sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20, 461–479. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651800
  • Stinchfield, B. T., Nelson, R. E., & Wood, M. S. (2013). Learning from Levi-Strauss’ legacy: Art, craft, engineering, bricolage, and brokerage in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 889–921. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00523.x
  • Storper, M., & Walker, R. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Sydow, J., Windeler, A., Müller-Seitz, G., & Lange, K. (2012). Path constitution analysis: A methodology for understanding path dependence and path creation. BuR – Business Research, German Academic Association for Business Research (VHB), 5, 155–176.
  • Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90, 403–427. doi:10.1111/ecge.12055
  • Tanner, A. N. (2016). The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography, 16, 611–635. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv011
  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2015). External ‘energy’ for regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development (Papers in Innovation Studies No. 2015/47). Lund: Lund University, Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE).
  • Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012). Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46, 1–21. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
  • Truffer, B., Murphy, J. T., & Raven, R (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004
  • Vallance, P. (2016). Universities, public research, and Evolutionary Economic Geography. Economic Geography, 92, 355–377. doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1146076
  • Verbong, G., & Geels, F. (2012). Future electricity systems: Visions, scenarios and transition pathways. In G. P. J. Verbong & D. Loorbach (Eds.), Governing the energy transition: Reality, illusion or necessity? (pp. 203–219). New York: Routledge.
  • Wenting, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Firm entry and institutional lock-in: An organizational ecology analysis of the global fashion design industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 1031–1048. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr032
  • Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084
  • Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Andersson, M. (2016). Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness (Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 16.27). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
  • Yeung, H. W., & Coe, N. M. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91, 29–58. doi:10.1111/ecge.12063

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.