Does inventor centrality foster regional innovation? The case of the Swiss medical devices sector

REFERENCES

• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. doi: 10.2307/2667105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D., & Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32, 247–265. doi: 10.1111/1467-9531.00117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2010). Recombinant knowledge and growth: The case of ICTs. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(1), 50–69. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2009.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127–145. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, T. H. (2007). Buzz-and-pipeline dynamics: Towards a knowledge-based multiplier model of clusters. Geography Compass, 1(6), 1282–1298. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00070.x
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2007). Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy, 36(1), 107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 289–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2012). Related variety and economic growth in Spain. Regional Science, 91, 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lenzi, C. (2012). Net city: How co-invention networks shape inventive productivity in US cities. Paper presented at the American Association of Geography 2012 Conference, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439–468. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. doi: 10.1086/421787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2007). If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy, 36(3), 303–319. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffano, M., & Tarasconi, G. (2014). CRIOS-Patstat database: Sources, contents and access rules (CRIOS Working Paper, No. 1). Center for Research on Innovation, Organization and Strategy (CRIOS). Retrieved from Social Science Research Network (SSRN), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2404344
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8), 1557–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornbusch, F., Schmoch, U., Schulze, N., & Bethke, N. (2013). Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach. Research Evaluation, 22(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs033 doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvs033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409–429. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D.F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (vol. 1, pp. 381–410). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169721810010087.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2005). Cluster absorptive capacity: Why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind? European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3), 269–288. doi: 10.1177/0969776405056593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. (2006). Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 5–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder, G. (2002). How does globalisation affect local production and knowledge systems? The surgical instrument cluster of Tuttlingen, Germany (INEF Report No. 57). Duisburg: Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden (INEF).
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F. (2010). Academic inventors as brokers. Research Policy, 39(7), 843–857. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., & Sanditov, B. (2013). Small worlds in networks of inventors and the role of academics: An analysis of France. Industry and Innovation, 20(3), 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002).The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 429–449. doi: 10.1068/a3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., & Malmberg, A. (2006). Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997–1013. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769 doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Cluster. (2014). Swiss MedTech report. Bern: Medical Cluster . Retrieved from www.medtech-switzerland.com
   Google Scholar
• Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2013). Skilled labour mobility, networks and knowledge creation in regions: A panel data approach. Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 191–212. doi: 10.1007/s00168-012-0526-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mina, A., Ramlogan, R., Tampubolon, G., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2007). Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge. Research Policy, 36(5), 789–806. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzoni, M., Lissoni, F., & Tarasconi, G. (2014). How to kill inventors: Testing the Massacrator© algorithm for inventor disambiguation. Scientometrics, 101(1), 477–504. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1375-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 152(1), 197–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatraro, F. (2010). Knowledge coherence, variety and economic growth: Manufacturing evidence from Italian regions. Research Policy, 39, 1289–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlogan, R., Mina, A., Tampubolon, G., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2007). Networks of knowledge: The distributed nature of medical innovation. Scientometrics, 70(2), 459–489. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-0212-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N., Gelijns, A. C., & Dawkins, H. (Eds.). (1995). Sources of medical technology: Universities and industry. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306. doi: 10.1002/smj.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlich, T. (2002). Surgery, science and industry. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., & Storper, M. (2003). The increasing importance of geographical proximity in technological innovation. Paper presented at the What Do We Know about Innovation? conference. Retrieved from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/events/KP_Conf_03/documents/Sonn_Storper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swissmedic. (2014). Annual report. Bern: Swissmedic.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., & Boschma, R. A. (2009). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 739–756. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42(6), 869–889. doi: 10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. doi: 10.2307/2393808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, V., Beerkens, B., & Dysters, G. (2009). The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non-core technologies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(2), 215–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360. doi: 10.1162/003355398555595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A Modern Approach. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2008). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 315–329. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar