Systemic interventions in regional innovation systems: entrepreneurship, knowledge accumulation and regional innovation

REFERENCES

• Ahrweiler, P., Gilbert, N., & Pyka, A. (2015). Policy modeling for large scale social systems. In E. Johnston (Ed.), Governance in the information era (pp. 229–246). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A., & Gilbert, N. (2011). A new model for university-industry links in knowledge-based economies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 218–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T. (1998). Territoriality and economics: On the substantial contribution of economic geography. In O. Jonsson, & L.-O. Olander (Eds.), Economic geography in Transition (Vol. 74, pp. 98–109). Lund: Swedish Geographical Yearbook.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011b). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34, 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011a). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L., & Pósfai, M. (2016). Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (1998). Regional innovation systems; The role of governances in a globalized world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., & Graf, H. (2011). Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks: A comparison of ten technologies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(4), 345–372. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.582704
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: Origins of the concept. In H. Braczyk, P. Cooke, & M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems (pp. 2–25). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, M., Hughes, A., Foster, J., & Metcalfe, S. (2011). Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia. Research Policy, 40, 1145–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1725–1753. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 41–63). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2004). Economics of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2007). How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 30, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9057-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist. New York: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2006). Principles of neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(2), 275–289. doi: 10.1093/cje/bel018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (2006, March). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z
   Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S. (2005). An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 497–519. doi: 10.1080/09654310500107084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SME’s in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(4), 295–303. doi: 10.1080/00343409950081167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609–619. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, S. S. (2009). Interorganizational learning the roles of competence trust, formal contract, and time horizon in interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 30(4), 333–353. doi: 10.1177/0170840608101139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. (2016). R&D policy instruments – A critical review of what we do and don’t know. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 157–176. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are ‘x-efficient’ (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(2), 291–302. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). Frascati manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. Paris: OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W, & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. doi: 10.1086/421508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. (2014). Avoiding evolutionary inefficiencies in innovation networks. Prometheus, 32(3), 265–279. doi: 10.1080/08109028.2015.1011877
   Google Scholar
• Pyka, A., & Fagiolo, G. (2007). Agent-based modelling: A methodology for a neo-Schumpeterian modelling. In H. Hanusch, & A. Pyka (Eds.), The Elgar companion on neo-Schumpeterian economics (pp. 467–492). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlaile, M. P., Zeman, J., & Mueller, M. (2018). It’s a match! Simulating compatibility-based learning in a network of networks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(5), 1111–1150. doi: 10.1007/s00191-018-0579-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Jena: Dunker & Humblot; English 1934 ed., The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle, vol. XLVI.
   Google Scholar
• Toedtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, B., & Pyka, A. (2018). The role of network topology and the spatial distribution and structure of knowledge in regional innovation policy: A calibrated agent-based model study. Computational Economics, 52(3), 773–808. doi: 10.1007/s10614-017-9776-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., Fagiolo, G., & Moneta, A. (2007). Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(2)8. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/2/8.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar