The impact of innovation and innovation subsidies on economic development in German regions

REFERENCES

• Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.wpi.2013.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one? Research Policy, 37(5), 806–822. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderton, K. (2017). Understanding the role of regional influence and innovation in EU policymaking: Bavaria and cars and CO2. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 640–660. doi: 10.1177/2399654417697702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristei, D., Sterlacchini, A., & Venturini, F. (2017). Effectiveness of R&D subsidies during the crisis: Firm-level evidence across EU countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(6), 554–573. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2016.1249543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems (Elgar Advanced Introductions series). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. (2016). The seven secrets of Germany: Economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M., Barberá-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M., & Tur, E. M. (2017). Dynamic interactions between university–industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent. Research Policy, 46(2), 463–474. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S., & Hemmings, P. (2000). OECD economics department working papers (No. 283). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917–942. doi: 10.1111/joes.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburne, E., & Frank, M. (2007). Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 7(2), 197–208. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0700700204
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, L. R., Gu, J., & Prieger, J. E. (2016). The impact of research and development on economic growth and productivity in the U.S. states. Southern Economic Journal, 82(3), 914–934. doi: 10.1002/soej.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma, N., Content, J., Sanders, M., & Stam, E. (2018). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 483–499. doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0012-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitung, J., & Pesaran, M. H. (2008). Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In L. Mátyás & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data: Fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice (pp. 279–322). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, T., & Broekel, T. (2011). Methodological issues in measuring innovation performance of spatial units. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 7–37. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2010.528927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T. (2015). Do cooperative research and development (R&D) subsidies stimulate regional innovation efficiency? Evidence from Germany. Regional Studies, 49(7), 1087–1110. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.812781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., Brachert, M., Duschl, M., & Brenner, T. (2017). Joint R&D subsidies, related variety, and regional innovation. International Regional Science Review, 40(3), 297–326. doi: 10.1177/0160017615589007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., Brenner, T., & Buerger, M. (2015). An investigation of the relation between cooperation intensity and the innovative success of German regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(1), 52–78. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2014.992359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: The role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannone, G., & Ughetto, E. (2014). Funding innovation at regional level: An analysis of a public policy intervention in the piedmont region. Regional Studies, 48(2), 270–283. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.653338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., Giebler, A., Günther, J., Kristalova, M., & Meder, A. (2018). Innovation cooperation in East and West Germany: A study on the regional and technological impact. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 8(3/4), 242–279. doi: 10.1504/IJCEE.2018.096360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). The lag structure of the impact of business ownership on economic performance in OECD countries. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 101–110. doi: 10.1007/s11187-006-9007-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579–594. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211–253. doi: 10.1093/icc/9.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Dettmann, E., Dominguez Lacasa, I., Günther, J., & Jindra, B. (2016). The importance of localized related variety for international diversification of corporate technology. Regional Studies, 50(10), 1648–1662. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1049994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebolt, C., & Hippe, R. (2019). The long-run impact of human capital on innovation and economic development in the regions of Europe. Applied Economics, 51(5), 542–563. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2018.1495820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Égert, B. (2016). Regulation, institutions, and productivity: New macroeconomic evidence from OECD countries. American Economic Review, 106(5), 109–113. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20161026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickelpasch, A., & Fritsch, M. (2005). Contests for cooperation – A new approach in German innovation policy. Research Policy, 34(8), 1269–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251. doi: 10.2307/1913236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, A., Grisorio, M. J., & Prota, F. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Which role for public policies and innovation agencies? Some insights from the experience of an Italian region. European Planning Studies, 19(8), 1399–1422. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.586173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy (Regions and Cities No. 79). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulos, G., & Storey, D. J. (2017). Persistence and change in interregional differences in entrepreneurship: England and Wales, 1921–2011. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(3), 670–702. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16674336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2004). Cooperation and the efficiency of regional R&D activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(6), 829–846. doi: 10.1093/cje/beh039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48(6), 955–973. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2019). Regional trajectories of entrepreneurship, knowledge, and growth. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2001). Innovation and growth in the global economy (7th Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guloglu, B., & Tekin, R. B. (2012). A panel causality analysis of the relationship among research and development, innovation, and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 2(1), 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation, Volume 2 (pp. 1033–1042). Burlington: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254. doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2002). How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of Upper Austria. Technovation, 22(3), 147–159. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00081-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 332–345. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K.-J. (2012). The coevolution of IT innovation and copyright institutions: The development of the mobile music business in Japan and Korea. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 245–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Rodriguez, J., & Martinez-Lopez, D. (2017). Looking beyond the R&D effects on innovation: The contribution of non-R&D activities to total factor productivity growth in the EU. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 40, 37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynskey, M. J. (2006). Transformative technology and institutional transformation: Coevolution of biotechnology venture firms and the institutional framework in Japan. Research Policy, 35(9), 1389–1422. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marek, P., Titze, M., Fuhrmeister, C., & Blum, U. (2017). R&D collaborations and the role of proximity. Regional Studies, 51(12), 1761–1773. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1242718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrotta, P., & Sala, D. (2016). Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy, 45(9), 1715–1730. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (2013). Principles of economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., & Semieniuk, G. (2017). Public financing of innovation: New questions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 24–48. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grw036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. H. (2013). Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Montmartin, B., & Herrera, M. (2015). Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models. Research Policy, 44(5), 1065–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, E., Zenker, A., Hufnagl, M., Héraud, J.-A., Schnabl, E., Makkonen, T., & Kroll, H. (2017). Smart specialisation strategies and cross-border integration of regional innovation systems: Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 684–702. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16688472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development betrayed: The end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2016. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. P. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. C. B., & Moon, H. R. (2000). Nonstationary panel data analysis: An overview of some recent developments. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 263–286. doi: 10.1080/07474930008800473
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. doi: 10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanso-Navarro, M., & Vera-Cabello, M. (2018). The long-run relationship between R&D and regional knowledge: The case of France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Regional Studies, 52(5), 619–631. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1360476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (2000). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (8th Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, L., Kubis, A., & Titze, M. (2019). Do diasporas affect regional knowledge transfer within host countries? A panel analysis of German R&D collaborations. Regional Studies, 53(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1391378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., & Günther, J. (2012). What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? – Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation, 32(6), 358–369. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze, M., Brachert, M., & Kubis, A. (2014). Actors and interactions-identifying the role of industrial clusters for regional production and knowledge generation activities. Growth and Change, 45(2), 163–190. doi: 10.1111/grow.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. (1994). The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. In J. A. C. Baum & J. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 425–443). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., & Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy, 45(3), 707–723. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2111–2136. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E. C. (2010). Determinants of R&D investment: The extreme-bounds-analysis approach applied to 26 OECD countries. Research Policy, 39(1), 103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar