Development patterns and their sources of competitiveness in the EUSALP macro-region

REFERENCES

• Anselin, L. (1988). Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis, 20(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydalot, P. (Ed.). (1986). Milieux innovateurs en Europe. Paris: Groupe de Recherche Européen sur les Milieux Innovateurs (GREMI).
   Google Scholar
• Aydalot, P., & Keeble, D. (1988). High technology industry and innovative environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (1975). Lo sviluppo economico della Toscana con particolare riguardo all’industrializzazione leggera. Florence: Guaraldi.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (1989). Sectors and/or districts: Some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics. In E. Goodman & J. Bamford (Eds.), Small firms and industrial districts in Italy (pp. 123–135). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1991). Technological change, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards dynamic theory of economic space. In R. Camagni (Ed.), Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives (pp. 121–144). London: Belhaven-Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1992). Economia urbana: principi e modelli teorici. Rome: Nuova Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science, 74(4), 317–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1995.tb00644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2002). Milieux innovateurs and collective learning: From concepts to measurement. In Z. J. Acs, H. L. F. de Groot, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), The emergence of the knowledge economy. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Maillat, D. (Eds.). (2006). Milieux innovateurs. Théories et politiques. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (1994). Towards new industrial and spatial structure: The role of new technologies. Papers in Regional Science, 73(2), 189–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1994.tb00610.x
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2009). Indivisibilities, synergy and proximity: The need for an integrated approach to agglomeration economies. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 100(2), 145–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2016). Regional economics (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Cerisola, S. (2018). Economic growth and innovation in EUSALP: Local specificities and growth assets for the competitiveness of the macro-region. Economia Marche, 13(2), 55–81.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Cerisola, S. (2019). Competitiveness through integration in the European Union Strategy for the Alpine Region: A ‘balanced development’ approach. European Planning Studies, 27(5), 1013–1034. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1588860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2009). Commission staff working document accompanying the document report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (COM(2009) 248 final). Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2013). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the added value of macro-regional strategies (COM(2013) 468 final). Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2015). Europeanisation and macro-regional cooperation – Nine points for discussion. In F. Sielker & K. Vonhoff (Eds.), Proceedings – Conference on the EU strategy for the Danube Region: Challenges and chances 2014–2020. Retrieved February 22, 2019, from https://www.danube-region.eu/attachments/article/616542/DSRN_Conference_Proceedings_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2016). Measuring the added-value of the EUSDR – Challenges and opportunities (Input Paper). Brussels: DG Regio and Danube Strategy Point. Retrieved from https://www.danube-region.eu/attachments/article/616586/Chilla_Sielker_Discussion%20paper_EUSDR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ciciotti, E. (1982). Differenze regionali nella capacità innovativa. Politica ed Economia, 3, 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Decoster, E., & Tabariés, M. (1986). L’innovation dans un pôle scientifique et technologique: Le cas de la Cité Scientifique Ile-de-France. In P. Aydalot (Ed.), Milieux innovateurs en Europe (pp. 79–100). Paris: Groupe de Recherche Européen sur les Milieux Innovateurs (GREMI).
   Google Scholar
• Eilat, Y., & Einav, L. (2004). Determinants of international tourism: A three-dimensional panel data analysis. Applied Economics, 36, 1315–1327. doi: 10.1080/000368404000180897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission DG REGIO. (2017). Study on macro-regional strategies and their links with Cohesion Policy. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/studies/2017/macro-regional-strategies-and-their-links-with-cohesion-policy
   Google Scholar
• European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON). (2018). Alps2050 common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision – Targeted analysis final report. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/01_alps_2050_FR_main_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: A critique of the ‘territorialism’ underlying. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1594–1606. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, A. (1933). Capital and the growth of knowledge. Economic Journal, 43(171), 379–389. doi: 10.2307/2224281
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel, A. (2001). Why high-technology firms choose to locate in or near metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 38(7), 1083–1101. doi: 10.1080/00420980120051666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganau, R., & Rodríguez-Pose A. (2019). Do high-quality local institutions shape labour productivity in Western European manufacturing firms? Papers in Regional Science, 98(4), 1633–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., Stead, D., Sielker, F., & Chilla, T. (2018). Macro-regional strategies, cohesion policy and regional cooperation in the European Union: Towards a research agenda. Political Studies Review, doi: 10.1177/1478929918781982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearing, C. E., Swart, W. W., & Var, T. (1974). Establishing a measure of touristic attractiveness. Journal of Travel Research, 12(4), 1–8. doi: 10.1177/004728757401200401
   Google Scholar
• Groenendijk, N. (2013). Macro-regions: Regional integration within and beyond the EU. Paper presented at the 21st NISPAcee Annual Conference, Belgrade, Serbia, May 16–18, 2013. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11488441.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, E. M. (1948). The location of economic activity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, D. (1997). Small firms, innovation and regional development in Britain in the 1990s. Regional Studies, 31(3), 281–293. doi: 10.1080/00343409750134692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzi, C. (2019). Innovation and the mobility of talents across space. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 18(3), 365–396.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. (1997). Review of international tourism demand models. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 835–849. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00049-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. (2002). Clustering dynamics and the location of high-tech firms. Berlin: Physica.
   Google Scholar
• Maillat, D., Quévit, M., & Senn, L. (1993). Réseaux d’innovation et milieux innovateurs: Un pari pour le développement régional. Neuchâtel: EDES.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th Ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2013). Modern urban and regional economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai, I. (2015). Economic productivity flip-flop in the Danube countries. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 183, 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.840
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1), 17–23. doi: 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurske, R. (1952). Some international aspects of the problem of economic development. American Economic Review, 42(2), 571–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). ISIC Rev. 3 technology intensity definition – Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/48350231.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, H., Dunn, E., Lampard, E., & Muth, R. (1960). Region, resources and economic growth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance. Economie Appliquée, 7(1/2), 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Plangger, M. (2017). Exploring the role of territorial actors in cross-border regions. Territory, Politics, Governance, doi: 10.1080/21622671.2017.1336938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine. (1999). Le paradigm de milieau innovateur dans l’économie contemporaine. Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202–211. doi: 10.2307/2226317
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1959). Due lezioni sui problemi di sviluppo. L’Industria, 4, 422–442.
   Google Scholar
• Schymik, C. (2011). Blueprint for a macro-region – EU strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions (SWP Research Paper No. 10). Retrieved from https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2011_RP10_shy_ks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. (1996). Reasons for the genesis of high-tech regions – Theoretical explanation and empirical evidence. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 27(2), 205–223. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(96)00007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studzieniecki, T. (2016). The development of cross-border cooperation in an EU macroregion – A case study of the Baltic Sea region. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 235–241. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30318-5
   Google Scholar
• Turşie, C. (2015). Macro-regional strategies of European integration. What can the Danube region learn from the Baltic Sea region? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 183, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.839
   Google Scholar
• Var, T., Beck, R. A. D., & Loftus, P. (1977). Determination of touristic attractiveness of the touristic areas in British Columbia. Journal of Travel Research, 15(3), 23–29. doi: 10.1177/004728757701500306
   Google Scholar
• Vladova, G., & Knieling, J. (2016). Prospects for an EU macro-regional approach in the Black Sea Region. plaNext. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Volume-2-prospects-for-an-eu-macro-regional-approach-in-the-black-sea-area.pdf
   Google Scholar