Clusters, economic performance, and social cohesion: a system dynamics approach

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T., & Thomas, A. (2000). Poverty and development into the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aranguren, M. J., De La Maza, X., Parrilli, M. D., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Wilson, J. R. (2014). Nested methodological approaches for cluster policy evaluation: An application to the Basque Country. Regional Studies, 48(9), 1547–1562. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.750423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H., & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116–131. doi: 10.2307/2234208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–71. doi: 10.1257/jel.49.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. E. (1996). Company–scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, 86, 641–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydalot, P. (1986). Milieux innovateurs en Europe. Paris: Groupe de Recherche Européen sur les Milieux Innovateurs (GREMI).
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). Agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy. Brussels: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., & Oliver, C. (1996). Toward an institutional ecology of organizational founding. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1378–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (1989). Sectors and/or districts: Some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics. In Goodman, E. et al. (Eds.), Small firms and industrial districts in Italy (pp. 123–135). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and local economic regeneration (pp. 37–51). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS).
   Google Scholar
• Belussi, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Industrial districts/clusters and Smart Specialisation policies. In Belussi, F., & Hervas-Oliver, J. L. (Eds.), Agglomeration and firm performance. Advances in spatial science ( Regional Science Series). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. (1983). Development. The ‘Third World' and ‘Development'. A. Thomas and H. E. Bernstein. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (2000). Characteristics of foreign subsidiaries in industry clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), 141–154. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boros, E., Hammer, P. L., Ibaraki, T., Kogan, A., Mayoraz, E., & Muchnik, I. (2000). An implementation of logical analysis of data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 12(2), 292–306. doi: 10.1109/69.842268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusco, S. (1992). Small firms and the provision of real services. In F. Pyke & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and local economic regeneration (pp. 177–196). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS).
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1991). ‘Local milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. London: Belhaven.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J. (2009). Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 35–41. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2008.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2015). Knowledge, innovation and productivity gains across European regions. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1788–1804. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.917167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society and culture. End of millennium. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., To, H. P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, P. H., Edwards, R., Goulbourne, H., & Solomos, J. (2007). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical Social Policy, 27, 24–49. doi: 10.1177/0261018307072206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinitz, B. (1961). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. American Economic Review, 51, 363–374.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. A. (2016). How firms shape income inequality: Stakeholder power, executive decision making, and the structuring of employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 324–348. doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1987). Entrepreneurial research: Old questions, new answers and methodological issues. Purdue University, Krannert Graduate School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32, 480–499. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24351453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495–518. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 43, 1785–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumais, G., Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. L. (2002). Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 193–204. doi: 10.1162/003465302317411479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2001). From sectoral to functional urban specialisation ( CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2971).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Glossary: Economic and social cohesion. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/what/glossary/e/economic-and-social-cohesion
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Feldman, M. P., & Srholec, M. (2013). Technological dynamics and social capability: US states and European nations. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 313–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. (1994). The geography of innovation (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes. (2018). What The Economist got wrong about the decline of Silicon Valley (September). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikesmerklo/2018/09/18/what-the-economist-got-wrong-about-the-decline-of-silicon-valley/#3baf1574203d. Accessed October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2125–2143. doi: 10.1080/00420980120087081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1970). Urban dynamics. Industrial Management Review, 11(3), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1971). World dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U. (2015). Regional knowledge flows and innovation policy: A dynamic representation. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1859–1872. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1068930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1979). Basic needs, agropolitan development, and planning from below. World Development, 7, 607–613. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(79)90096-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garavaglia, C. (2010). Modelling industrial dynamics with ‘history-friendly’ simulations. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(4), 258–275. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2010.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Garofoli, G. (1992). Endogenous development in Southern Europe. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Giblin, M. (2011). Managing the global–local dimensions of clusters and the role of ‘lead’ organizations: The contrasting cases of the software and medical technology clusters in the West of Ireland. European Planning Studies, 19, 23–42. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.530529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, B. A. (2017). Agglomeration, industrial districts and industry clusters: Trends of the 21st century literature. Foundations and Trends^® in Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 1–80. doi: 10.1561/0300000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152. doi: 10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, U., & Kunc, M. (2015). Philosophical insights in system modelling: An application to the field of innovation systems. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 9, 437–453. doi: 10.1504/IJEBR.2015.069681
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. E. (1994). Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 36(1–2), 53–73. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(94)90057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. (2000). Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 387–423. doi: 10.1086/316965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Characterizing the ‘technological position’ of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy, 18, 87–97. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies, 37, 995–1017. doi: 10.1080/00420980050011208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (2000). High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantynova, A., & Wilson, J. R. (2017). Cluster policies and cluster institutions: An opportunity to bind economic and social dimensions? Economia e Politica Industriale, 44(4), 457–472. doi: 10.1007/s40812-017-0081-x
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. (2000). Technology, trade and factor prices. Journal of International Economics, 50(1), 51–71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00016-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomi, A., & Larsen, E. R. (2001). Dynamics of organizations: Computational modeling and organization theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 23–42. doi: 10.1080/13662719400000002
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. (1997). Technology & economic development. The dynamics of local, regional, and national competitiveness. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (1997). Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies, 5, 25–41. doi: 10.1080/09654319708720382
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 5–35. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2011). Conceptualizing cluster evolution: Beyond the life cycle model? Regional Studies, 45(10), 1299–1318. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.622263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Massard, N., & Autant-Bernard, C. (2015). Editorial: Geography of innovation: New trends and implications for public policy renewal. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1767–1771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37, 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Networks and organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, A., Swiatek, D. C., & Moulaert, F. (2012). Social cohesion: A conceptual and political elucidation. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1873–1889. doi: 10.1177/0042098012444878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). International Conference on Territorial Development: Local clusters, restructuring territories, and environment-enterprises-districts. Paris: OECD-Délégation Interministérielle à l’Aménagement du Territoire et à l’Attractivité Régionale (DATAR).
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. (2002). Rigged rules and double standards. Trade, Globalisation, and the Fight against Poverty (Report). Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2007). Upgrading to compete. Global value chains, clusters and SMEs in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piore, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2018). Root cause regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2001). Clusters of innovation: Regional foundations of U.S. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37, 549–578. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000108688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizations. Research on Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P. D., & White, S. B. (1997). The entrepreneurial process. Economic growth, men, women, and minorities. Westport, Quorum.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, H. O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. A literature review. Small Business Economics, 23, 363–400. doi: 10.1007/s11187-004-3991-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, H. O. (2013). Entrepreneurship and regional development: The role of clusters. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, H. O. (2015). Do clusters matter to firm and regional development and growth? Evidence from Latin America. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 13, 83–123. doi: 10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2013-0534
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, H. O., & Sternberg, R. (2005). Entrepreneurship: The role of clusters theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics, 24, 267–292. doi: 10.1007/s11187-005-1993-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological-change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1257/jep.8.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, C., Ciechanover, A., & Modi, K. (2015). San Francisco, 2015 #tech #inequality (Harvard Business School Case No. 315-076, January; revised March).
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. (1994). Perspectives on growth theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 45–54. doi: 10.1257/jep.8.1.45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, G. M., Vinodrai, T., Gertler, M. S., & Wolfe, D. A. (2010). Do clusters make a difference? Defining and assessing their economic performance. Regional Studies, 44, 697–715. doi: 10.1080/00343400903107736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N., & Osman, T. (2015). The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (1989). The geographic foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In J. R. Wolch & M. J. Dear (Eds.), The power of geography: how territory shapes social life (pp. 21–40). London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Temouri, Y. (2012). The cluster scoreboard: Measuring the performance of local business clusters in the knowledge economy (OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Working Papers No. 2012/13), Paris: OECD Publ. http://doi.org/10.1787/5k94ghq8p5kd-en
   Google Scholar
• Todaro, M. (2000). Economic development. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2004). The least developed countries report 2004. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• United Nation Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2009). Cluster development for pro-poor growth: The UNIDO approach ( Business, Investment and Technology Services Branch, Technical Paper Series). UNIDO.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2012). The effects of cluster policy on innovation. Compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. Manchester: Manchester Institute of Innovation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, K., & Lindqvist, G. (2010). The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics, 34, 221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar