Contextualizing agency in new path development: how system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity

REFERENCES

• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2020). Towards a stage model of regional industrial path transformation. Industry and Innovation, 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1789452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42(3), 219–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J.-A. (2007). Making new political spaces: Mobilizing spatial imaginaries, instrumentalizing spatial practices, and strategically using spatial tools. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(11), 2593–2611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a39228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S., Michie, J., & Tyler, P. (2010). Regional resilience: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, 1, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fredin, S., Miörner, J., & Jogmark, M. (2019). Developing and sustaining new regional industrial paths: Investigating the role of ‘outsiders’ and factors shaping long-term trajectories. Industry and Innovation, 26(7), 795–819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1535429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J., & Moodysson, J. (2019). Innovation policy for system wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programs (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy, 48(4), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies and new regional growth paths: A place-based system failure framework. In J. Niosi (Ed.), Innovation policy, systems and management (pp. 329–358). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2018). Imagining the post-fossil city: Why is it so difficult to think of new possible worlds? Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1510339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2010). Regional resilience: A promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., & Marques, P. (2014). Advancing evolutionary economic geography by engaged pluralism. Regional Studies, 48(7), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.889815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, M. (2019). Time should tell (more): Evolutionary economic geography and the challenge of history. Regional Studies, 53(4), 602–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1515481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, M., Stam, E., & Wenting, R. (2013). Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Regional Studies, 47(8), 1348–1362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.750422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2014). The rise (and fall?) of post-industrial Malmö. Investigations of city-crisis dialectics [Doctoral dissertation., Lund University, Department of Human Geography]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/e8fe3f91-c164-415b-9d69-d65b6dad95b1
   Google Scholar
• Holmen, A. K. T., & Fosse, J. K. (2017). Regional agency and constitution of new paths: A study of agency in early formation of new paths on the west coast of Norway. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 498–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1276159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. (2018). From success to failure, the disappearance of clusters: A study of a Norwegian boat-building cluster. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 221–238). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Innovation in space: The mosaic of regional innovation patterns. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional re(turns) and the strategic – Relational approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(7), 1213–1235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a32183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2005). Critical realism and the strategic–relational approach. New Formations, 56, 40. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/209/
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1014661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, H., & Martin, R. (2017). Policy capacities for new regional industrial path development – The case of new media and biogas in southern Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(3), 518–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16665845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2012). (Re)placing path dependence: A response to the debate. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 36(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01091.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. (2019). (Re-)shaping regional economies: Regional innovation system dynamics and new industrial path development. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. (2020). The road towards autonomous driving – A differentiated view of institutional agency in path transformation. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2020.1770852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2017). Paving the way for new regional industrial paths: Actors and modes of change in Scania’s games industry. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1212815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2019). Embracing the future: Path transformation and system reconfiguration for self-driving cars in West Sweden. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2144–2162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiolik, J., Markard, J., & Hekkert, M. (2012). Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiolik, J., Markard, J., Hekkert, M., & Furrer, B. (2018). Creating innovation systems: How resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, R. (2013). Regional leadership: A systemic view. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9268-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, D. E. (2004). Technological prediction. In M. Sturken, D. Thomas, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Technological visions (pp. 159–185). Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). OECD territorial reviews: Skåne, Sweden 2012. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of spatial life. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 23(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a230239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Dawley, S., & McMaster, R. (2016). Doing evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography, 92(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1108830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, A. C. (1995). Putting critical realism to work: The practical implications for geographical research. Progress in Human Geography, 19(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259501900104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaile, M., Urmetzer, S., Blok, V., Andersen, A., Timmermans, J., Mueller, M., Fagerberg, J., & Pyka, A. (2017). Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustainability, 9(12), 2253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiberg, M. (2007). What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 47–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwl006
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2010). Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010903549408
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2009). Power and influence tactics in the promotion of regional development: An empirical analysis of the work of Finnish regional development officers. Geoforum, 40(5), 895–905. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2017). An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(4), 584–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16664906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Horlings, L. (2012). Leadership and sustainable regional development. In Sotarauta, M., Horlings, L., & Liddle, J. (Eds.), Leadership and change in sustainable regional development (pp. 17–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2015). Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c12297r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c1066r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2018). Institutional agency and path creation. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 85–104). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Salais, R. (1997). Worlds of production: The action frameworks of the economy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Walker, R. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sydsvenskan. (2015). Så vill vi göra södra Sverige till Europas ledande spelregion. https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2015-06-09/sa-vill-vi-gora-sodra-sverige-till-europas-ledande-spelregion
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation, and transition (pp. 297–318). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 687–705. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2005). Tell me about … : Using interviews as a research methodology. In R. Flowerdew, & D. Martin (Eds.), Methods in human geography: A guide for students doing a research project (pp. 110–126). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mossel, A., Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2018). Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 44–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VG Region. (2014). VG2020: Smart specialisering i Västra Götaland. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from https://alfresco.vgregion.se/alfresco/service/vgr/storage/node/content/workspace/SpacesStore/02fd34ad-6c8e-4a51-bd0c-7ecd659c76dc/vgr_smartspecialisering_sv_web.pdf?a=false&guest=true
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., & Moodysson, J. (2014). Support organizations in the regional innovation system of Skåne. Region Skåne.
   Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar