Distance (still) hampers diffusion of innovations

REFERENCES

• Alexopoulos, M. (2011). Read all about it!! What happens following a technology shock? American Economic Review, 101(4), 1144–1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos, M., & Cohen, J. (2011). Volumes of evidence: Examining technical change in the last century through a new lens. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 44(2), 413–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos, M., & Cohen, J. (2019). Will the new technologies turn the page on US productivity growth? Economics Letters, 175, 19–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Jara-Figueroa, C., Petralia, S. G., Steijn, M. P., Rigby, D. L., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2020). Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 248–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0803-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bei, X. (2019). Trademarks, specialized complementary assets, and the external sourcing of innovation. Research Policy, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenzon, S., & Schankerman, M. (2013). Spreading the word: Geography, policy, and knowledge spillovers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 884–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bently, L. (2008). The making of modern trade mark law: The construction of the legal concept of trade mark (1860–1880). In L. Bently, J. Davis, & J. C. Ginsburg (Eds.), Trade marks and brands: An interdisciplinary critique (pp. 3–41). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Reenen, J. V. (1995). Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. The Economic Journal, 105, 333–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2235494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalini, C., Lacetera, N., & Oettl, A. (2015). The incidence and role of negative citations in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(45), 13823–13826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502280112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M., Graham, S. J., Higgins, M. J., & Lee, J. (2010). Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms demand for technology innovations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 839–869. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., Gertler, M. S., & Wójcik, D. (2018). The new Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not) (Working Paper 7552). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Comin, D. A., Dmitriev, M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2012). The spatial diffusion of technology (Working Paper No. 18534). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Comin, D., & Hobijn, B. (2010). An exploration of technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2031–2059. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comin, D., Hobijn, B., & Rovito, E. (2008). A new approach to measuring technology with an application to the shape of the diffusion curves. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9079-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinlersoz, E. M., Goldschlag, N., Myers, A., & Zolas, N. (2018). An anatomy of US firms seeking trademark registration. In Measuring and accounting for innovation in the 21st century. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 381-410). North-Holland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7
   Google Scholar
• Feynman, R. P. (1960). There’s plenty of room at the bottom. California Institute of Technology, Engineering and Science Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, C., Fosfuri, A., Helmers, C., & Myers, A. F. (2018). Submarine trademarks (Economic Research Working Paper No. 51). World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
   Google Scholar
• Flamm, K., & Varas, P. (2020). Technological innovation and quality improvement in US broadband. SSRN 3749840.
   Google Scholar
• Flikkema, M., De Man, A.-P., & Castaldi, C. (2014). Are trademark counts a valid indicator of innovation? Results of an in-depth study of new Benelux trademarks filed by SMEs. Industry and Innovation, 21(4), 310–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.934547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., Shimizu, H., & Vezzulli, A. (2013). Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004. Research Policy, 42(10), 1780–1792. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, C., Goldfarb, A., & Greenstein, S. (2016). Agglomeration of invention in the Bay Area: Not just ICT. American Economic Review, 106(5), 146–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. J. (2018). Declining American economic growth despite ongoing innovation. Explorations in Economic History, 69, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, H. G., & Vernon, J. M. (2000). Effective patent life in pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(1/2), 98–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. J. H., Marco, A. C., & Myers, A. F. (2018). Monetizing marks: Insights from the USPTO trademark assignment dataset. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27(3), 403–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. J., Hancock, G., Marco, A. C., & Myers, A. (2013, January 31). The USPTO trademark case files dataset: Descriptions, lessons, and insights (USPTO Working Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. J., Merges, R. P., Samuelson, P., & Sichelman, T. (2009). High technology entrepreneurs and the patent system: Results of the 2008 Berkeley patent survey. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 24, 1255.
   Google Scholar
• Grodal, S. (2018). Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(4), 783–818. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217744555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodal, S., Gotsopoulos, A., & Suarez, F. F. (2015). The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 423–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. (2006). Innovation and diffusion. In J. Fagerberg & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 459–485). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., & Harhoff, D. (2012). Recent research on the economics of patents (Working Paper 17773). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Hannigan, T. J., Cano-Kollmann, M., & Mudambi, R. (2015). Thriving innovation amidst manufacturing decline: The Detroit auto cluster and the resilience of local knowledge production. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(3), 613–634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, J., Hall, B., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), 909–938. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1911191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., Li, Y. A., & Minondo, A. (2018). Geography, ties, and knowledge flows: Evidence from citations in mathematics. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment: Comment. American Economic Review, 95(1), 461–464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S. (2015). GEOCODEHERE: Stata module to provide geocoding relying on Nokias here maps API. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Hippel, E. V., Jong, J. D., & Flowers, S. (2010). Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: Findings from a representative study in the UK. Management Science, 58(9), 1669–1681. www.jstor.org/stable/23257859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001. www.jstor.org/stable/1816464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W., Perlegos, G., Renninger, A., Kuhn, G., & Ranganath, T. (1980). A 16Kb electrically erasable nonvolatile memory. In 1980 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of technical papers (pp. 152–153). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.1980.1156030
   Google Scholar
• Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(24), 7426–7431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424329112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. R. (2013). The gravity of knowledge. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1414–1444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. (2000). The death of cities? The death of distance? Evidence from the geography of commercial internet usage. In The internet upheaval: Raising questions, seeking answers in communications policy (pp. 73–98). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T. (2000). The incidental parameter problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics, 95(2), 391–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R. E., & Nelson, A. C. (2007). America 2040: The rise of the megapolitans. Planning, 73, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3. https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/1987/12/1987c_bpea_levin_klevorick_nelson_winter_gilbert_griliches.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. A. (2014). Borders and distance in knowledge spillovers: Dying over time or dying with age? – Evidence from patent citations. European Economic Review, 71, 152–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonca, S., Pereira, T. S., & Godinho, M. M. (2004). Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy, 33(9), 1385–1404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca, S., Schmoch, U., & Neuh, P. (2019). Interplay of patents and trademarks as tools in economic competition. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 1023–1035). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, P. (2012). Innovation without patents: Evidence from world’s fairs. The Journal of Law and Economics, 55(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/663631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. J. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 38(6), 994–1005. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. J., Earle, A., Howard-Grenville, J., Haack, J., & Young, D. (2014). Do innovation measures actually measure innovation? Obliteration, symbolic adoption, and other finicky challenges in tracking innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 43(6), 927–940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. D., & Rae, A. (2016). An economic geography of the United States: From commutes to mega regions. PloS One, 11, e0166083. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) & Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation, 4th Edition, The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publ./Eurostat. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
   Google Scholar
• Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053970258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R. (2015). GEOINPOLY: Stata module to match geographic locations to shapefile polygons. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. B., & Fusfeld, A. R. (1982). Critical functions: Needed roles in the innovation process. In R. Katz (Ed.), Career issues in human resource management. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. (2003). Service marks as novel innovation indicator. Research Evaluation, 12(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semadeni, M. (2006). Minding your distance: How management consulting firms use service marks to position competitively. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semadeni, M., & Anderson, B. S. (2010). The follower’s dilemma: Innovation and imitation in the professional services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1175–1193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., & Marx, M. (2013). Geographic constraints on knowledge spillovers: Political borders vs. spatial proximity. Management Science, 59(9), 2056–2078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella, V. J., Charman, W., & Naringrekar, V. H. (1985). Prodrugs. Drugs, 29(5), 455–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198529050-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma, G. (2015). The value of patent and trademark pairs. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2015(1), 12373–12373. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2015.12373abstract
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, 95(1), 450–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windmeijer, F. A., & Santos Silva, J. M. (1997). Endogeneity in count data models: An application to demand for health care. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199705)12:3<281::AID-JAE436>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigermann, L. (2016). OPENCAGEGEO: Stata module for forward and reverse geocoding using the Opencage Geocoder API. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar