Machine learning and the identification of Smart Specialisation thematic networks in Arctic Scandinavia

REFERENCES

• Arnold, C. W., Oh, A., Chen, S., & Speier, W. (2015). Evaluating topic model interpretability from a primary care physician perspective. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 124, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, J. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2012). Summarizing topical content with word frequency and exclusivity. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on machine learning, Edinburgh, UK, June 26–July 1, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-aoas114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2009). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 64–81). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one’s own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practicing interdisciplinarity (pp. 115–133). Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in Smart Specialization Strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J., Boyd-Graber, J., Wang, C., Gerrish, S., & Blei, D. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 288–296). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deveaud, R., SanJuan, E., & Bellot, P. (2014). Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval. Document Numérique, 17(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.3166/dn.17.1.61-84
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). The role of universities and research organisations as drivers for Smart Specialisation at regional level. http://ec.europa.eu/research/regions/pdf/publications/ExpertReport-Universities_and_Smart_Spec-WebPublication-A4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2013). The economic fundamentals of smart specialisation. Ekonomiaz, 83(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804137-6.00002-4
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation–the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00146-3
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, F. (2012). On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsdóttir, A., & Greve Harbo, L. (2017). Nordic Arctic strategies in overview. https://archive.nordregio.se/Global/Publications/Publications%202017/PB%202017%201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, I., Teräs, J., & Wøien, M. (2018). The potential for smart specialisation for enhancing innovation and resilience in Nordic regions. Preliminary report: Policy and literature review. https://www.nordregio.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/The-potential-of-Smart-Specialisation-for-enhancing-innovation-and-resilience-in-Nordic-regions-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K.-J., & Trippl, M. (2013). Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies, 47(3), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.560933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., Weidenfeld, A., & Williams, A. M. (2017). Cross-border regional innovation system integration: An analytical framework. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108(6), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, web of science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, E., Zenker, A., Hufnagl, M., Héraud, J.-A., Schnabl, E., Makkonen, T., & Kroll, H. (2017). Smart specialisation strategies and cross-border integration of regional innovation systems: Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 684–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16688472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.026113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E. (2015). Constructing regional advantage in branding the cross-border Euroregion Galicia–northern Portugal. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1044020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagiannidis, S., See-To, E. W. K., Assimakopoulos, D. G., & Yang, Y. (2018). Identifying industrial clusters with a novel big-data methodology: Are SIC codes (not) fit for purpose in the internet age? Computers & Operations Research, 98, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavone, P., Pagliacci, F., Russo, M., & Giorgi, A. (2019). R&I smart specialisation strategies: classification of EU region ‘priorities’. Results from automatic text analysis. https://iris.unimore.it/retrieve/handle/11380/1196211/252292/0148.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Oulu. (2019). The cross-border cooperation on innovation – A joint taskforce. https://www.oulu.fi/oulubusinessschool/node/58610
   Google Scholar
• van Ark, B., O’Mahony, M., & Timmer, M. P. (2008). The productivity gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and causes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar