Retheorizing industrial–institutional coevolution: a multidimensional perspective

REFERENCES

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2003). Toward a relational economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2014). Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513507823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2021). Towards a stage model of regional industrial path transformation. Industry and Innovation, 28(2), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1789452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2020a). Mitigating human agency in regional development: The behavioural side of policy processes. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7, 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1760732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2020b). The decline of tourist destinations: An evolutionary perspective on overtourism. Sustainability, 12(9), 3653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2020c). The spatial evolution–institution link and its challenges for regional policy. European Planning Studies, 28(12), 2428–2446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1698520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, E. M. (2008). Cluster life cycles: An emerging synthesis. In C. Karlsson (Ed.), Handbook of research on cluster theory (pp. 114–132). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems – A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. (2016). Towards a typology of repositioning strategies of GVC/GPN suppliers: The case of functional upgrading and downgrading. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(4), 849–869. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Trippl, M. (2020). The dark side of regional industrial path development: Towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (1988). Technical change and the theory of ‘régulation’. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. L. G. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 67–94). Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2005). Coherence, diversity, and the evolution of capitalisms – The institutional complementarity hypothesis. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2(1), 43–80. https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.2.43
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., & Hollingsworth, J. R. (1997). From national embeddedness to spatial and institutional nestedness. In J. R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds.), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions (pp. 433–484). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2014). Building resilient regions: Complex adaptive systems and the role of policy intervention. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 72(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-014-0280-0
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. G., & Coe, N. M. (2001). Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1980.tb00970.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Ueda, M. (2006). Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Management Science, 52(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, J. P., Eymard-Duvernay, F., Favereau, O., Orléan, A., Salais, R., & Thévenot, L. (1989). Introduction. Revue économique, 40, 141–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2007). Exploring evolutionary economic geographies. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the single path view: Interpath dynamics in regional contexts. Economic Geography, 96(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In R. Garud & P. Karnøe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2020). Smart specialisation: What gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies, 54(10), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J. (2020). Institutional context and place-based policy: The case of Coventry & Warwickshire. Growth and Change, 51(1), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., & Lenz, R. (2016). How institutions moderate the effectiveness of regional policy: A framework and research agenda. Investigaciones Regionales - Journal of Regional Research, 36, 255–277.
   Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., Punstein, A. M., Wuttke, C., & Kirchner, P. (2020). The ‘hourglass’ model: An institutional morphology of rural industrialism in Baden-Württemberg. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1554–1574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1693981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2019). Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: Towards a theoretical framework. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1494824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2020). Context sensitivity and economic–geographic (re)theorising. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(3), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. (2015). Institutional layers, connectedness and change: Implications for economic evolution in regions. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2099–2124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.1003796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2017). Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 261–280). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. L. (2020). Rethinking cluster evolution: Actors, institutional configurations, and new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 45(3), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520926587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450–468). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., & Marques, P. (2014). Advancing evolutionary economic geography by engaged pluralism. Regional Studies, 48(7), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.889815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, D. (2020). Institutional work in the maintenance of regional innovation policy instruments: Evidence from Wales. Regional Studies, 54(3), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1634251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems: Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 221–238). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R. J. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2020). Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis. Geoforum, 111, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G. (1994). The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1068/d120257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Murphy, J. T. (2010). Theorizing practice in economic geography: Foundations, challenges, and possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3), 366–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510375585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2007). Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science, 53(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2004). From Moby dick to free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization, 11(5), 689–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404046457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, R., & Glückler, J. (2021). Same same but different: Regional coherence between institutions and policies in family firm succession. European Planning Studies, 29(3), 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1757041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, N. J., & Feldman, M. P. (2017). Institutional life within an entrepreneurial region. Geography Compass, 11(3), e12306. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. (2012). Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm–region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., & McMaster, R. (2009). Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic Geography, 85(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2006). Innovation and the evolution of industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-005-0005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In E. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 77–94). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2011). Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(4), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0067-2
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2007). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2011). Conceptualizing cluster evolution: Beyond the life cycle model? Regional Studies, 45(10), 1299–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.622263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles – Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2019). Embracing the future: Path transformation and system reconfiguration for self-driving cars in West Sweden. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2144–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmann, J. P. (2013). The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments. Organization Science, 24(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1998). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. In J. Chytry, D. J. Teece, & G. Dosi (Eds.), Technology, organization, and competitiveness: Perspectives on industrial and corporate change (pp. 319–335). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunn, N. (2012). Culture and the historical process. Economic History of Developing Regions, 27(Suppl. 1), S108–S126. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2012.664864
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2002). Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography, 78(3), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.2307/4140813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2007). Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507083505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). Institutions and the fortunes of regions. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 12(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salais, R., & Storper, M. (1992). The four ‘worlds’ of contemporary industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schamp, E. W. (2009). Wissen, Netzwerk und Raum – offen für ein Konzept der ‘co-evolution’? In U. Matthiesen & G. Mahnken (Eds.), Das Wissen der Städte: Neue stadtregionale Entwicklungsdynamiken im Kontext von Wissen, Milieus und Governance (pp. 33–45). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6588004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setterfield, M. (1993). A model of institutional hysteresis. Journal of Economic Issues, 27(3), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1993.11505453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (1992). Contours of a spatialized politics: Homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text, 33(33), 54–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/466434
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2018). Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Beer, A. (2017). Governance, agency and place leadership: Lessons from a crossnational analysis. Regional Studies, 51(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1119265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2015). Institutional entrepreneurship, power, and knowledge in innovation systems: Institutionalization of regenerative medicine in Tampere, Finland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12297r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Pulkkinen, R. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1066r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S. (2010). Path dependence and path plasticity: The co-evolution of institutions and innovation – The German customized business software industry. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 406–431). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000203632
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L., & Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45(7), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802662658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation, and transition (pp. 297–317). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020a). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., & Healy, A. (2020b). Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1328–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, W. H. (2019). Rethinking mechanism and process in the geographical analysis of uneven development. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(3), 226–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619861861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar