Reconsidering regional structural conditions for industrial renewal

REFERENCES

• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Living in the global. In A. Amin, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalisation, institutions, and regional development in Europe (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406067008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2021). Towards a stage model of regional industrial path transformation. Industry and Innovation, 28(2), 160–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1789452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems—a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion, and innovation (pp. 64–81). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Vale, M. (2018). Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Empson, L., Muzio, D., Broschak, J., & Hinings, B. (2015). Researching professional service firms. In J. Broschak, & L. Empson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of professional service firms (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T., & Meyer, R. (eds.). (2017). SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinings, C. R., Logue, D., & Zietsma, C. (2017). Fields, institutional infrastructure and governance. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 163–189). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/096922900750034563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems. In M. D. Parrilli, R. Dahl-Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, L., Vissers, G., Larsson, A., & Dahlström, M. (2016). Territorial knowledge dynamics and knowledge anchoring through localized networks: The automotive sector in Västra Götaland. Regional Studies, 50(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2020). Agency and actors in regional industrial path development. A framework and longitudinal analysis. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 176–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleebinder, H.-P., Kleissner, A., Helmenstein, C., & Semmer, M. (2019). Auf der Siegerstraße bleiben: Automotive Cluster der Zukunft bauen. https://www.bmvit.gv.at/themen/alternative_verkehrskonzepte/elektromobilitaet/zahlen/mobilitaetsstudie.html
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational studies (pp. 215–254). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logue, D. (2014). The ‘stuff’ of markets: An institutional analysis of impact investing. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 10480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.10480abstract
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. (2020). Contextualizing agency in new path development: How system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity. Regional Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2019). Embracing the future: Path transformation and system reconfiguration for self-driving cars in West Sweden. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2144–2162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). The innovation imperative: Contributing to productivity, growth and well-being. OECD Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Lobe, B. (2009). The case for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison. In D. Bryne, & C. Ragin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of case-based methods (pp. 222–242). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Regions and cities. Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation and transition (pp. 297–317). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Green path development, asset modification and agency: Towards a systemic integrative approach. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Goracinova, E., & Wolfe, D. A. (2021). Automotive regions in transition: Preparing for connected and automated vehicles. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20987233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2005). Tell me about … : Using interviews as a research methodology. In R. Flowerdew, & D. Martin (Eds.), Methods in human geography: A guide for students doing a research project (pp. 110–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future of a core construct. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Anderson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 130–147). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zietsma, C., Groenewegen, P., Logue, D. M., & Hinings, C. R. (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. The Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 391–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2094862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Plechero, M. (2017). Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar